Memory Flashcards
Coding
STM is acoustic
LTM is semantic
Baddeley - acoustically and semantically similar and dissimilar words (then tested immediately and after20 mins)
Capacity
STM is 7 +/- 2 chunks
LTM is potentially infinite
Miller - given string of numbers and letters until they couldn’t recall
Duration
STM is 18-30 seconds LTM is up to a lifetime Peterson and Peterson - 3 second consonant trigram fro 2 secs - distracted - recall trigram Bahrick - photo recognition test and free recall - 400 students - 48 years later = 70% accurate for photo recognition
Coding, capacity and duration - evaluation
- Bahrick - high ecological validity (but confounding variable of rehearsal)
- Baddeley - artificial stimuli
- Peterson and Peterson - lacks external validity
Types of LTM
- Episodic
- experiences in time sequence
- time stamped
- conscious effort - semantic
- abstract knowledge about the world
- not time stamped
- conscious effort - procedural
- muscle memory (automatic)
- not time stamped
- no conscious effort
Types of LTM - evaluation
- Tulving - brain scans and found episodic and semantic in prefrontal
- Clive Wearing - semantic and procedural not affected (but case study)
Multi - store model
Environmental input — sensory memory — STM —LTM
SM to STM - attention
STM to LTM - rehearsal
LTM to STM - retrieval
Shows memory is not unitary
MSM - evaluation
- Well controlled studies into differences between STM and LTM
- oversimplifies LTM
- Over reliance on maintenance rehearsal - emotion can reduce need
- Case studies - HM and Clive Wearing
Working memory model
Central executive - directs processes and very small capacity
Phonological loop - phonological store and articulatory system
Visuo - spatial sketchpad - visual cache and inner scribe
Episodic buffer - temporary store
WMM - evaluation
- No evidence of CE - how it works and what it does
- Dual task study support - but biased but different researcher could solve
- KF - verbal impaired but visual unaffected
Explanations for forgetting - interference
Proactive - new is disrupted by old
Retroactive - old is disrupted by new
McDonald et al
- learn list of 10 words until 100% accurate
- learned another list (then recall first
- synonyms, antonyms, unrelated, nonsense, numbers and no new list
Interference - evaluation
- Lab experiment - good and bad
2. IRL studies - rugby (number of games not time since)
Explanations for forgetting - retrieval failure
Encoding specificity principle - cue present at learning and recall lacking necessary cues to remember State dependent - internal state - antihistamine (drowsy) - on and off drug - better when concordant
Context dependent
- environment and location
- 40% lower in non - matching
- Godden and Baddeley
- learns list of words underwater and on land
Retrieval failure - evaluation
- real life applications - looking for something
- context effects - not very strong
- recall vs. recognition - cues only affect memory in certain ways
- very controlled
EWT - misleading info
- leading questions - phrasing might bias response
- Loftus and Palmer
- 45 ptps watch clips of car accidents
- 5 groups (hit, bumped, contacted, collided, smashed)
- verb mattered (contacted - 31.8 mph vs. smashed - 40.5 mph)