Memory Flashcards

1
Q

steps of learning and memory

A
  1. Encoding of information into memory;
  2. Storage of information within the memory system;
  3. Retrieval of stored information from memory.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

iconic store

A

brief sensory store for visual information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

George Sperling 1960

A

experiments to understand iconic store :

12 lettres in grid array

flashed for .. ms

“partial report” condition: participants had to report either the top, middle or bottom row of letters

able to report most of the letters from the requested line, but only if the delay between removal of the array and presentation of the prompt was ~1 s or less.

–> information in iconic storage decays in less than a second.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

echoic store

A

sensory store for auditors modality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Anne Treisman 1964

A

participants presented with an auditory message to one ear

asked to repeat the message back aloud while ignoring a second message being presented to the other ear.

If the second, ignored, message was actually identical to the first but started at a different time, participants only noticed they were the same if they started within 2 seconds of each other.

–> persistence of unattended information in the echoic store is ~2 s, otherwise information decays.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

George Miller ( 1965 )

A

capacity ( span ) of short term memory

recall of strings correctly up to a length of 7 +- 2 digits

also letters/ words

–> short-term memory : 7 integrated units of information ( chunks )

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

short-term store:

A

Atkinson & Shiffrin
information currently held in mind
limited capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

retention of information in short term memory

A

rehearsing

longer in short-term –> higher chance in long term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Rundus 1971

A

hypothesis: longer in short-term –> higher chance in long term

20 words :
rehearse the list out loud.

asked to recall the words –> more frequently a word had been rehearsed, the more likely it was to be recalled on the word recall test.

The exception to this was the last few words in the list, which always had a high likelihood of recall irrespective of the amount of rehearsal. the recency effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

recency effect

A

observation that the last few items in a list are often much better remembered than items from the middle of the list

last few items still being present in the short-term store from the end of list presentation

supported by Glanzer & Cunitz ( 1966 )
–> recency effect eliminated if participants counted backwards prior to recall –> information displaced from short term memory –> supports link with short term memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Peterson & Peterson (1959)

A

duration of short-term memory

remember a 3-letter stimulus for a few seconds while counting backwards in threes. The ability to remember the stimulus diminished rapidly, suggesting that information decays from short-term memory within a matter of seconds.

however, Waugh&Norman ( 1965)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Waugh&Norman ( 1965)

A

remember a 3-letter stimulus for a few seconds while counting backwards in threes. The ability to remember the stimulus diminished rapidly,

manipulated the speed with which digits that were to be remembered were presented to participants and found that digit recall was (more or less) unaffect

–> short- term memory forgetting is due to interference from exposure to additional information, rather than the passage of time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

primacy effect

A

Earlier items in a list also tend to be better remembered than those in the middle

Atkinson & Shiffrin : items are recalled from long-term memory.

Glanzer & Cunitz :
primacy effect was unaffected by counting backwards after list presentation –> supports. hypothesis of long term memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Criticism Multi Store Model

A

processing in the short-term store is required for encoding into long- term memory

underestimates importance of depth of processing ( vs time in short term memory ) for information to be stored in long term memory

short-term and long-term stores are unitary, operating in a single, uniform way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

patient KF

A

defective short-term memory (digit span)

but preserved long-term learning and recall
–> evidence against claim that need short for long

Warrington & Shallice (1972):

worse short-term memory for auditory letters and digits than for visual stimuli, suggesting that there may be distinct short-term memory stores for different kinds of material

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Baddeley & Hitch (1974)

A

dual-task methodology:

auditory rehearsal of digits did not affect the number of errors made in a concurrent grammatical reasoning task.

–> distinction between an auditory-verbal short-term store and a central information processing system involved in reasoning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Working Memory Model

A

Baddeley & Hitch (1974) to address limitations of multi-store model : determined on basis of numerous dual-task experiments

4 primary components:
an auditory-verbal phonological loop
–> short-term storage of speech-based information

a visuo-spatial sketchpad
–> short-term storage of spatial and visual information

a multimodal episodic buffer –> holds and integrates information from the phonological loop, visuo-spatial sketchpad and long-term memory;

a modality-free central executive
–> responsible for selecting and initiating cognitive processing routines.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

phonological loop

A

a slave system for the temporary retention of spoken verbal material such as a phone number

storage capacity determined by rate of rehearsal ( Baddeley 1975)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

visiospatial sketchpad

A

a slave system for the temporary storage and manipulation of spatial and visual information, such as the location of a phone number on the page of a phone book

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

episodic buffer

A

a limited capacity system for integrating phonological and visuospatial representations with information from long-term memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

central executive

A

a modality-free processing system involved in coordinating the operation of the other systems for performing demanding cognitive tasks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Robbins et al. (1996)

A

involvement of working memory components in chess move selection

testing the effect of several concurrent tasks: rapid word repetition, sequential key pressing and random number generation.

The key pressing task (which involved the visuo-spatial sketchpad) and the random number generation task (which involved the central executive) affected the quality of chess moves selected,

word repetition task (which involved the phonological loop) had no effect.

–> chess move selection involves the central executive and visuospatial sketchpad, but not the phonological loop.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

phonological similarity effect

A

Baddeley (1966):

serial recall of a list of phonologically similar words (such as FEE, HE, KNEE, etc.) was significantly worse than from a list of phonologically dissimilar words (such as BAY, HOE, IT, etc.), whereas visual or semantic similarity had little effect on recall

  • -> speech-based representations used to store words
  • -> recall requires discrimination between memory traces
  • -> more difficult if words sound same

–> attributed to confusions between similar representations in the phonological store

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

world length effect

A

Baddeley et al 1975

recalling long words worse than recalling same words

mean digit span differs across cultures:

digit span in speakers of Chinese (in which digits are relatively quick to say) is greater than in speakers of Welsh (in which digits take longer to say)

depends on phonological loop:
word length effect eliminated if participants mouthed words ( articulatory suppression )

  • -> phonological storage capacity determined by rate of rehearsal
  • -> time taken to rehearse longer words via the articulatory control process induce world length effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
articulatory control process
linked to speech production --> gives access to phonological store
26
phonological store
concerned with speech. perception
27
Baddeley et al 1975 visiospatial
participants : encode material using either rote verbal learning or an imagery-based strategy. Performance of imagery-based strategy disrupted using pursuit rotor tracking (tracking a moving light), verbal strategy was unaffected
28
pursuit rotor tracking
involves visual perception as well as spatial localization
29
visual cache
passively stores information about visual form and colour and is subject to decay and interference by new visual information
30
inner scribe
processes spatial information and allows active rehearsal of information in the visual cache
31
Baddeley & Lieberman (1980)
asked participants to encode material using either rote verbal learning or an imagery-based strategy concurrent tasks: visual ( making brightness judgements ) spatial ( pointing at a moving pendulum while blindfolded, guided by an auditory tone ) --> learning using imagery based strategies--> disrupted by spatial concurrent tasks --> Logie visiuospatial working memory can be divided into two components
32
neuropsychological data supporting visual cache and inner scribe distinction
Beschin et al. (1997) reported patient NL, who had preserved perceptual skills but could not describe details of a scene from memory. Farah et al. (1988) reported patient LH, who performed better on spatial processing tasks than on visual imagery tasks.
33
Baddeley et al 1984
articulatory suppression does reduce memory span for visually-presented material (e.g., from ~7 to ~5 items), but does not eliminate it as would be predicted by the phonological loop model.
34
Chincotta et al. (1999)
studied memory span for Arabic numerals (1, 2, 3, etc) and digit words (one, two, three, etc), finding that participants used both verbal and visual representations in performing the task
35
reason for episodic buffer
verbal and visual information must be combined and stored somewhere in working memory - -> Chincotta 1999 - -> Baddeley 1984 - -> patients with severely impaired short-term phonological memory, with an auditory span of only 1 digit, can typically recall up to 4 digits with visual presentation memory span for meaningful sentences can be as much as 15-16 words, vastly exceeding normal phonological loop capacity (Baddeley et al., 1987) --> not due to long term memory --> severely amnesic patients can also exhibit normal immediate sentence span ( Baddeley & Wilson (2002) )
36
episodic buffer location
right frontal cortex Prabhakaran et al. (2000): activation in right frontal cortex stronger for retention of integrated than modality specific information posterior regions exhibited material-specific working memory effects (phonological loop and visuospatial sketchpad)
37
major functions of central executive
switching attention between tasks planning sub tasks selective attention : ignoring certain stimuli updating and checking the contents of other w. m stores
38
main method used to study central executive
random generation - difficult to generate random non stereotyped patterns ( repetition, lettres in alphabetical order acronyms are often generated )
39
Baddeley 1996
asked participants to hold 1-8 digits in mind while trying to generate a random sequence of key-presses on a key-pad randomness decreased as digit memory load increased --> greater demand on general-purpose, limited capacity central executive affected decreasing randomness: alternating between lettres and numbers --> rapid switching of attention between tasks function of central executive not affecting randomness: alphabet counting
40
dysexecutive syndrome
damage to frontal lobes impairments to function of central executive
41
D’Esposito et al. (1995)
dorsolateral regions of the frontal lobe showed greater activation under dual-task than single-task conditions.
42
Duncan
lateral frontal cortex as the neural basis of general intelligence --> a specific system involved in control of diverse forms of behaviour
43
factors affecting long-term retention
practice level of processing ( Craik and Lockhart 1972 - thinking about a words meaning considerably better memory than simply repeating it : semantic ( meaning based ) > phonological ( sound based) > perceptual ( visual or auditory) processing ) elaborating systematic organisaton spacing learning
44
forgetting from long term memory
very rapidly during first hour. then logarithmically primarily due to inference from other experienced events Jenkins & Dallenbach (1924) - forgetting greater during wake than sleep hours Baddeley & Hitch ( 1977) - rugby players to recall names of teams played against. What mattered were the number of teams not the time when played against
45
proactive inference
previous learning interferes with later learning - Underwood ( 1957 ) the more nonsense syllable lists a participant had previously learned, the more forgetting of new syllables the participant exhibited after 24 h
46
retroactive inference
later learning disrupts things learned earlier | - eyewitness memory for an event can be interfered with by post-event questioning
47
HM
1953 - 27 yrs - bilateral removal of medial temporal lobes to cure epilepsy epilepsy symptoms improved but ... amnesia unable to remember peoples names, words, objects regardless of sensory modality ``` but little change in intellectual functioning , language comprehension, perceptual functioning , reasoning abilities , semantic knowledge ability yo learn new motor skills short term memory ```
48
amnesia
deficits both in remembering past events and imagining future experiences ( Hassabis et al 2007) retrograde amnesia anterograde amnesia
49
explicit memory requires
conscious recollection of a previous experience
50
implicit memory
revealed when performance on a task is facilitated in the absence of conscious collection
51
explicit memory tasks
recognition cued recall free recall
52
implicit memory tasks
fragment completion word stem completion degraded word naming
53
what does manipulating factors in memory tests show
will either affect explicit or implicit memory --> two systems
54
Jacoby & Dallas (1981) effect of different levels of processing at encoding
Deeper levels of processing improved explicit memory (as previously shown by Craik & Tulving, 1975), but had little effect on implicit memory. effect of modality differences between study and test, changing modality between study and test --> no effect on explicit memory, --> significantly reduced implicit memory.
55
separation implicit explicit memory evidence
amnesia of damage to medial temporal lobe : on pursuit rotor or Gollin figures tasks, performance of amnesics improves over trials, despite the patients not being able to recall having done the test before (Warrington & Weiskrantz, 1970) --> can be impaired on explicit without being impaired on implicit and vice versa --> dissociable brain regions with functionally separate memory systems
56
MS
lesion at occipital cortex performs well on explicit but not implicit memory tasks
57
explicit encoding and or retrieval brain region
medial temporal lobe
58
perceptual priming activity brain region
associated with implicit memory posterior region of the brain --> fusiform Cortex
59
episodic memory
memory of specific events or episodes occurring in a particular time and place (e.g., remembering what you had for breakfast this morning) different for each person involving mental time travel
60
semantic memory
general knowledge about objects, people, facts, concepts and the meanings of words, without awareness of where or when the information was learned
61
Jacoby & Dallas (1981)
different levels of processing at encoding improved episodic memory, but had no effect on semantic memory
62
double dissociation semantic episodic
jacoby (1983) double dissociation, whereby reading a word out of context at encoding improved participants’ semantic memory, whereas generating the word themselves improved their subsequent episodic memory. controversial: neuropsychological patients HM; extensive medial temporal lobe damage, showed a severe impairment on episodic memory tasks, but was able to name pictures of everyday objects, define concepts early life hippocampal damage : impaired episodic memory, well semantic memory