Memory 2 Flashcards
What are the 4 problems with the Modal Model?
1) Mini-monoliths
2) Assumes the STS is a gateway to LTS
3) Assumes attention and rehearsal are the gateways to STS and LTS
4) Assumes STS is strictly phonological and LTS is strictly semantic
What does it mean by mini-monoliths when discussing the problems of the Modal Model?
- The model is oversimplified
- The model assumes that the STS and LTS are both unitary (operate in a single, uniform way)
- Subsequent research shows that each of the stores is complex and not unitary
What does it mean by STS being a gateway to LTS when discussing the problems of the Modal Model?
- The model assumes STS is a gateway between the Sensory store and LTS
- However, the info processed in STS has typically already made contact with the info in LTS
What does it mean by Attention and Rehearsal being gateways to STS and LTS when discussing the problems of the Modal Model?
-The model assumes most info in the sensory store is transferred to the STS via attention
- The model also assumes most info in the STS is transferred to the LTS via rehearsal
- However, only a small fraction of info stored in the STS and LTS was attended/rehearsed during learning
What does it mean by STS is strictly phonological and LTS is strictly semantic when discussing the problems of the Modal Model?
- The model assumes the STS and LTS codes are fixed and not flexible
- The model assumes that only one specific code (phonological or semantic) is used for each store
- The model does not consider non-verbal info and other modalities
What store decays extremely rapidly?
Iconic memory store (or Visual icon memory store)
Which 2 studies support the idea that iconic memory decays rapidly?
1) Sperling’s Partial Report Technique (the matrix of letters presented, Ps report only one row, if they report 3-4 letters in that row it is assumed that they memorised all 12 letters in the matrix)
2) Eriksen and Collins’s Dot-pattern fusion (displayed 2 dot patterns that were complementary so that when combined, Ps could see a three-letter trigram but their ability to guess the trigram based on only one of the dot patterns was nil)
Who introduced the Dot-pattern fusion?
Eriksen and Collins
When dot pattern 1 and dot pattern 2 are presented simultaneously to form a readable trigram, what is this an example of?
Dot-pattern fusion
Describe the Dot-pattern fusion
1) There are 2 stimuli:
- S1 = Random dot pattern 1
- S2 = Random dot pattern 2
2) S1 is presented to the Ps and S1 is quickly presented afterwards causing a “fusion”
- S1 and S2 are unreadable separately or if stimuli are flashed far apart in time/lag
- Fusion of S1 and S2 (if the stimuli are flashed closely enough in time) you can read the trigram
What does the Dot-pattern fusion theory suggest?
- If S1 and S2 are superimposed/flashed closely enough in time, you can read the letters of the trigram
OR
- If S1 is superimposed on the MEMORY of S2 and vice versa, you can also read the letters of the trigram
What is the effect of increasing inter-stimulus interval (ISI) on the ability to fuse 2 visual stimuli?
- Performance on being able to read the dot patterns declines as ISI increases
- If you use short intervals between flashing S1 and S2, people could reliably report the trigram than if the intervals were longer
What is the limitation of Eriksen and Sperling’s Dot-pattern fusion theory?
- Data were ambiguous
- People could read the trigram not because they remembered the stimuli but because, if the stimuli were flashed quickly enough, they could combine the patterns via visual processing/overlap in the visual processing of S1 and S2
- In other words, the persistence of visual info is a phenomenon of VISUAL PROCESSING and not sensory memory store
What does it mean by mini-monoliths when discussing the problems of the Modal Model?
- The model is oversimplified
- The model assumes that the STS and LTS are both unitary (operate in a single, uniform way)
- Subsequent research shows that each of the stores is complex and not unitary
What did Hogben and Di Lollo aim to find/argue in their experiment?
They aim to unravel whether Eriksen and Colins’ Dot-patter fusion results were due to decay from the sensory store or overlap in the visual processing of S1 and S2
What did Hogben and Di Lollo propose about Eriksen and Colins’ Dot-pattern fusion results in the DECAY FROM SENSORY STORE pov?
1) Decay starts from the offset of S1
- As S1 is presented, the memory trace of S1 goes up rapidly
- At first, the memory trace of S1 remains constant for a short while and later gradually decays
2) In the process of S1 decaying, S2 is presented just at the offset of S1; causes fusion
3) Declines in performance as ISI increases due to less effective overlap between memory trace of S1 and percept of S2
As the inter-stimulus interval (ISI) gets longer, the effective overlap (EO) gets … (larger/smaller)
Smaller
As the inter-stimulus interval (ISI) gets shorter, the effective overlap (EO) gets … (larger/smaller)
Larger
What did Hogben and Di Lollo propose about Eriksen and Colins’ Dot-pattern fusion results in the OVERLAP OF VISUAL PROCESSING pov?
1) Processing starts from the onset of S1 and runs its course
- As S1 is presented, the visual processing system processes the stimulus
- The system processes S1 no matter the duration the stimulus was presented
2) Whilst S1 is being visually processed, S2 is presented just at the onset of S1; causes overlap/fusion
3) Declines in performance as ISI increases due to less effective overlap between visual processing of S1 and visual processing of S2
As ISI increases, does performance in the dot-pattern fusion test improve or decline?
Decline
What are the differences between Hogben and Di Lollo’s explanations for the (1) decay from the sensory store and (2) overlap of visual processing?
- Memory decay starts from OFFSET (the decline in memory) of S1
- Visual processing starts from the ONSET (the beginning of processing) of S1
How can Hogben and Di Lollo’s explanations for the (1) decay from the sensory store and (2) overlap of visual processing make DIFFERENT PREDICTIONS?
- By manipulating the duration of S1 (stimulus onset asynchrony or SOA)
- By keeping the gap (ISI) at 0
Who investigated the effect of S1 duration?
Hogben and Di Lollo
What did Hogben and Di Lollo discover about the effect of S1 duration on DECAY FROM SENSORY STORE/MEMORY?
1) Decay starts from the offset of S1
2) Predicts NO decline in performance as S1 duration increases because the effective overlap does not change (ISI = 0, no interval gap)
Why is there NO decline in performance as S1 duration increases but ISI remains 0?
- Because ISI is kept constant at 0 for all trials meaning there are no long gaps/intervals between the memory trace of S1 and percept of S2
- Because S1 is presented longer, S1 is somewhat memorised and has fused with the presentation of S2
What did Hogben and Di Lollo discover about the effect of S1 duration on the OVERLAP OF VISUAL PROCESSING?
1) Processing starts from the onset of S1
2) Predicts decline in performance as S1 duration increases because effective overlap decreases
- If you process S1 longer than you process S2, you will most likely be able to recall what S1 looked like but not S2 because you didn’t have equal, sufficient time to process S2
- Thus the overlap between the processing S1 and S2 becomes shorter
Which is the correct assumption about the dot-pattern fusion results?
1) Decay from the sensory store
2) Overlap of visual processing
2) Overlap of visual processing
- Because as the duration of S1 increases and ISI remains constant at 0, performance declines which supports the result of Eriksen and Collins’ study
Who proposed that there are 3 separate phenomena explaining the argument between sensory store vs visual processing?
Colheart
What are the 3 separate phenomena that Colheart proposed?
1) Neural persistence
2) Visible persistence
3) Informational persistence
What is Neural Persistence?
The overlap of neural processing; very brief
What is Visible Persistence?
The overlap in visual processing; Di Lollo (<200 msec)
What is Informational Persistence?
The icon (visual info/memory) that decays; Sperling (150-300 msec)
Who criticised the study of iconic memory for lacking ecological validity (no obvious role in daily life)?
“The notion of an icon as a brief storage of information persisting after stimulus termination cannot possibly be useful in any typical visual information processing task except reading in a lightning storm.”
Haber
What 3 things are the STS for?
1) Gates conscious report (full vs partial report)
2) Responsible for rehearsal and transfer into LTS
3) Important for language comprehension