Learning 2 Flashcards

1
Q

What are the 4 main learning techniques?

A

1) Elaborative interrogation
2) Highlighting/underlining
3) Practice testing
4) Distributed practice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe Elaborative Learning

A

Generating an explanation for why an explicitly stated fact or concept is true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe Highlighting/Underlining

A

Marking potentially important portions to-be-learned materials while reading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe Practice Testing

A

Self-testing or taking practice tests of to-be-learned material

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe Distributed Practice

A

Implement a schedule of practice that spreads out study activities over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which learning technique involves asking “Why” questions?

A

Elaborative Interrogation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which learning technique involves asking “Why is this fact true of this and not some other reason?”

A

Elaborative Interrogation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How can Elaborative Interrogation be successful?

A
  • We are forced to actively consider WHY something happens on top of passively thinking about something
  • This method supports questioning of new information with existing prior knowledge which learners may link to provide an explanation
  • Learners activate schemata, which helps organise new info that eases the process of retrieval
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Who proposed a well-known Elaborative Interrogation experiment?

A

Pressley et al.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain Pressley et al. ‘s Elaborative Interrogation experiment

A

1) A series of sentences were provided (e.g. The hungry man got into the car)
2) There were 3 groups:
- Group 1 were asked a “why” question (e.g. Why did that particular man do that?)
- Group 2 were given an explanation (e.g. The hungry man got into the car BECAUSE he wanted to go to the restaurant)
- Group 3 simply read the sentence with no other prompt given (e.g. The hungry man got into the car)
3) Final test involved asking participants which man performed each action (e.g. Who got into the car?)
4) Findings = The Elaborative Interrogation group had the best performance when asked to recall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Are the findings of Pressley et al. ‘s Elaborative Interrogation experiment generalizable?

A

Yes?
- Effects have been shown amongst students working individually and in groups
- Works with UG students and younger
- Applicable to learners of varying ability levels and those with learning disabilities

But…
- The benefits for younger children below elementary school (kindergarten and 1st graders) age is unclear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How well does Elaborative Interrogation do when learning new facts about familiar items compared to new facts about unfamiliar items?

A

Students showed larger effects of Elaborative Interrogation in their high knowledge domain (prior knowledge/ new facts about FAMILIAR items) than in their low knowledge domain (facts about unfamiliar items)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Do the type and timing of the test matter when using the Elaborative Interrogation method to study?

A
  • Robust effect
  • Mostly tested with cued recall and matching
  • Also tested either immediately or within a few minutes of the learning phase (mainly reflects memory for explicitly stated info)
  • This method mainly affects for MCQs or verification tests that require inferences/ elaboration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

List 3 benefits of Elaborative Interrogation

A

1) Minimal training required and no detailed instructions or practice are needed
2) Reasonable time demands for reading/learning facts and generating elaboration
3) Consistency of the prompt “Why?”, straightforward recommendation to students about the nature of questions they should use to elaborate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

List 4 limitations of Elaborative Interrogation

A

1) For complex material, what level do you direct the “Why?” question at?
- Students require instructions about the kinds of content they should elaborate on in complex materials

2) Students may sometimes need to identify their own target facts

3) How often do you ask “Why?”, can be too overused

4) Not as useful for longer texts
- Elaborating on facts found in lengthy texts requires students to identify their own target facts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Which learning technique involves marking/underlining important to-be-learned facts of a material?

A

Highlighting/Underlining

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Why do students Highlight/Underline important material?

A

Highlighting/Underlining appeals to students because:
- It is simple to use
- No training is required
- It does not require a huge time investment as you only need to highlight as you read the material

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Who conducted a well-known Highlighting/Underlining learning experiment?

A

Fowler and Barker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What did Fowler and Barker do in their Highlighting/Underlining learning experiment?

A

1) Instructed UG students to read/study articles for 1 hour

2) There were 3 groups:
- Group 1 = Highlight as much text as they want
- Group 2 = Read text which had been previously highlighted by Group 1 students
- Group 3 = Simply read the article only

3) 1 week later, all groups were called for an MCQ test. They were allowed to review material for 10 mins before the test

4) Findings = Highlighting group (Group 1) did not outperform the other 2 groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What does Highlighting/Underlining help with?

A
  • Performance was better on test items for which the relevant text had been highlighted (but if info had not been highlighted, there was a small cost to test questions)
  • Active highlighting performed better than passive highlighting (reading texts previously highlighted by other people)
  • Actively selecting important facts allows learners to work out what’s important and think about the meaning of the text; benefits performance
21
Q

What would be considered “good quality highlighting”

A

Less text highlighted = more distinctive

Because if you highlight everything, there’s less focus, fewer distinctions between important facts and regular texts and you’ll also lose the actual important element

22
Q

Who proposed students should limit to highlighting a single sentence per paragraph for effective recall?

A

Rickards and August

23
Q

What is recommended for students when following the Highlighting/Underlining method?

A

Low utility
- Highlighting may hurt performance on higher-level tasks that require elaboration/inference
- Highlighting mainly draws attention to individual concepts; may be harder to make connections across other concepts

24
Q

When might the Highlighting/Underlining method be effective?

A
  • When prior knowledge is there, helps moderate the effectiveness of highlighting
  • Because people with prior knowledge know what info is important and what isn’t, which helps them highlight effectively
25
Q

What learning technique involves practising recall, problems or questions?

A

Practice testing

26
Q

What learning technique involves low-stakes or no-stakes practising?

A

Practice testing

27
Q

What learning technique involves learning facts/activity outside of class from summative assessments given by an instructor in class?

A

Practice testing

28
Q

What learning technique involves recalling from flashcards, doing online practice quizzes and completing practice questions at the end of textbook chapters?

A

Practice testing

29
Q

What learning technique involves test-taking?

A

Retrieval practice

30
Q

Why does practice testing improve learning?

A

1) Direct effects (changes in learning that arise from the act of taking a test itself)

2) Mediated effects (changes in learning that occur from testing on the amount/kind of material/info that takes place after the test)

31
Q

MCQ tests, Fill-in-the-blank tests and Essay style recall tests are all examples of …

A

Practice tests for retrieval practice

32
Q

Which learning technique has added benefit for long-term retention?

A

Retrieval practice (specifically practice tests)

33
Q

Who will perform better:

Learners who restudied the material + practised active recall OR learners who only restudied the material

A

Learners who restudied the material AND practised active recall would be able to recall words/info when prompted with cues than those who only restudied the material

34
Q

What are the well-known studies investigating the effects of retrieval practice (active recall)?

A

1) Karpicke’s Swahili-English translation active recall test

2) Roediger and Karpicke’s passage active recall test

35
Q

Explain Karpicke’s study of investigating the effects of retrieval practice (active recall)

A

1) Students were presented with 60 Swahili-English translations (words)

2) There were 2 groups:
- Group 1 only restudied the material/words
- Group 2 alternates between restudying the material/words and performing active recall tests

3) In the final recall test that all students took, Group 2 who did active recall and restudied recalled more words when prompted with cues

36
Q

Why does retrieval practice (active recall) work?

A
  • Recalling enhances how well students mentally organise info and process distinctive aspects of individual items
37
Q

What is recommended for students following the retrieval practice (active recall) method?

A
  • More practice, the better
  • Greater time intervals within trials result in greater benefits (repeated tests should be spaced out between studying and other practice tests)
38
Q

What did Roediger and Karpicke do in their active recall study?

A

1) All articipants were told to read a passage 4 times (initial task)

2) There were 2 groups:
- Group 1 = Read the passage 3 times + active recall (2nd study trial)
- Group 2 = Read the passage once + active recall on 3 occasions (recall test)

3) 1 week later, after the final test, Group 2 (the recall test group) performed better than Group 1 (2nd study trial group)

39
Q

Why does practice testing improve learning?

A
  • Direct effect (you get used to taking the test and changes arise from the act of taking the test itself)
  • Mediated effects (better learning at next study)
  • Testing can enhance retention by triggering an elaborative retrieval process (Carpenter, 2009)
40
Q

What did Carpenter et al’s study on retrieval practice suggest?

A

Testing increases semantic links (connecting facts/info with meaning) compared to simple restudy

  • Participants retrieved more info when they were given semantically-related cues
41
Q

What is recommended to students following the retrieval practice method?

A
  • Try different kinds of recall tests (e.g. short-answer, MCQs, comprehension etc)
  • Try active recall with different types of materials (e.g. factual, text, journal articles)
  • More testing, the better
  • Continue recalling until you get all the answers correct (keep retesting if you get it wrong)
  • High utility
  • Create flashcards, cornell notes
42
Q

What learning technique involves spreading out study content over a period of time?

A

Distributed practice

43
Q

Cramming vs Distributed practice. Which works best and why?

A

Distributed practice

  • Because by “spacing” learning activities out over time you will be able to learn more information and retain it longer
  • Because of deficient processing:
    —> When studying sessions/reviews are spaced apart, long-term learning is enhanced. Processing of info suffers when study trials are close in time (massed practice)
44
Q

What was the well-known study investigating the effects of Distributed practice on recalling?

A

Bude et al.

1) Examined learning stats across 2 sections of the same course over 6 months and 8 weeks

2) Lectures, meetings and lab sessions were shortened in the 8-week program than the 6-month program and retrieval activities were more crammed in the 8-week program

3) Findings = 6-month course students performed better at open-ended qs and final exams

45
Q

What are the 4 main strengths of Distributed practice?

A

1) Deficient processing -> No need to work very hard to reread notes/retrieve straight away

2) Reminding -> 2nd presentation of to-be-learned material reminds learner of the 1st learning opportunity (practice testing)

3) Consolidation (2nd learning opportunity benefits from making the knowledge/facts learnt from the 1st learning opportunity stronger)

4) Multiple mechanisms?

46
Q

What are the recommendations for students following a distributed practice method?

A

High utility

  • The more spaced out the study sessions, the better but it depends on how long you want to know the material for
  • Spacing between learning sessions should be around 10-20% of how long you want to know the material for
47
Q

Which learning techniques are categorised as high-utility?

A

1) Practice testing
2) Distributed practice

48
Q

Which learning techniques are categorised as moderate utility?

A

1) Elaborative interrogation
2) Self-explanation

49
Q

Which learning techniques are categorised as a low utility?

A

1) Summarisation
2) Highlighting
3) Mnemonic
4) Imagery use for text learning
5) Rereading