Memory Flashcards
Carter & Cassidy 1998
Participants were better at recalling words when conditions (antihistamines) at learning and recall matched
Suggests absence of internal cues contributed to forgetting
Supports Tulving’s ESP
Godden & Baddeley 1975
Divers were better at recalling words in matching conditions
Suggests absence of external cues contributes to forgetting
Supports Tulving’s ESP
McGeoch & McDonald 1931
Interference between words is greatest when the words are semantically similar
Suggests similarity is key variable in LTM interference
Shallice & Warrington 1970
KF was amnesiac
Performed poorly on STM language tasks but well on visual ones
Suggests that STM is not one store (PL and VSS) - limitation of MSM
Bahrick 1975
Accuracy in recalling names - 90% after 15 years, 70% after 48 years
Suggests duration of LTM may be unlimited
Peterson & Peterson 1959
Trigrams experiment, given distractor task
After 3 secs = 80% recall
After 18 secs = 3%
Suggests very short duration in STM
Miller 1956
Most people have digit span on 7+-2
Chunking can increase span
Suggests STM capacity is much smaller than LTM
Baddeley 1966
STM makes acoustic errors (encodes acoustically)
LTM makes semantic errors (encodes semantically)
Baddeley & Hitch 1977
Found rugby players were worse at remembering teams they played if they had played more subsequent games
Suggests interference is a bigger factor in forgetting than time
Kohnken 1999
Cognitive interview gave 41% increase in accurate info than standard interview
BUT also gave more wrong info
Suggests cognitive interview is effectove
Johnson & Scott 1976
Recall of man with bloody knife = 33%
Recall of man with pen = 49%
Suggests anxiety decreases accuracy of EWT
Weapons focus effect
Baddeley 1975
Perform well doing one visual and one auditory task, but poorly doing 2 of the same task
Suggests that STM has separate systems
Clive Wearing & HM
Both suffered amnesia
Lost episodic LTM but retained procedural LTM
LTM has 3 stores - support for WMM, limitation of MSM
Loftus & Palmer 1974
Contacted = 31mph, smashed = 40mph (recall broken glass which was not there)
Suggests leading questions can create false memories, reducing EWT accuracy
Gabbert 2003
After post event discussion = 71% recalled inaccurate info
No post event discussion = 0% inaccurate info
Suggests post event discussion reduces EWT accuracy