Mass Wasting - Mitigation Flashcards
since when did mgb started hazard assessments
2013 after yolanda
hazard assessment under mgb
flood, landslide, ground subsidence/karst, coastal hazard assessments
regional and detailed scale maps
1:50000
1:10000
they are mandated to conduct studies related to rain-induced landslide
mgb
how does mgb conduct geohazard mapping
remote sensing
field assessment
anecdotal accounts
what do you look for during field assessment
tension cracks, depth of tension, vertical and horizontal displacement,
gently sloping areas with no identified landslides
low landslide susceptibility
areas with moderately steep slopes, soil creep and other indications of possible landslide occurrence are present
moderate landslide susceptibility
areas with steep to very steep slopes and underlain by weak materials. areas with numerous old/inactive landslides
high landslide susceptibility
areas with steep to very steep slopes and underlain by weak materials. recent landslides, escarpments and tension cracks are present. human initiated effects could be an aggravating factor
very high landslide susceptibility
areas that could be affected by landslide debris
debris flow/ possible accumulation zone
slope classification
0-3 : level to nearly level
3-8 : gently sloping to undulating
8-18 : undulating to rolling
18-30 : rolling to moderately steep
30-50 : steep
>50 : very steep
non structural mass wasting mitigation
- zoning laws
- construction ordinances
- geohazard assessment
- research and extension
- information dissemination
structural mass wasting mitigation
retaining walls
rock bolts
controlling water
terracing
covering steep slopes
reducing slope materials
protective structure
if the objective is to prevent movement, then slope stability can be maximized by simultaneously increasing _____ and decreasing _____
frictional forces
the weight acting downslope