Marlow Flashcards
Marlow: Does Team Communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach? A meta-analysis of team communication & performance: Welche Teammerkmale wurden untersucht? 3
Vertrautheit
Virtualität
Führungsstruktur
Marlow: Does Team Communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach? A meta-analysis of team communication & performance: Welche Aufgabenmerkmale wurden angeschaut?
Interdependenz
Aufgabenart (kognitiv, action based)
Marlow: Does Team Communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach? A meta-analysis of team communication & performance: Wie wurde Kommunikation operationalisiert?
Qualität
Quantität (kognitive load theory: zu viel => man vergisst Wichtiges)
Inhalt: beziehungs vs. aufgabenorientiert
Marlow: Does Team Communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach? A meta-analysis of team communication & performance: Wie kann Kommunikation gemessen werden? 7
Information sharing (unique or common information sharing measures)
general information sharing measures
knowledge sharing measures
self-reported vs. objective measures of communication frequency
openness of communication measures
content analysis coded communication
information elaboration
Marlow: Does Team Communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach? A meta-analysis of team communication & performance: What’s knowledge sharing measures?
to which degree do individuals share their expertise with fellow team members?
Marlow: Does Team Communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach? A meta-analysis of team communication & performance: What’s openness of communication measures?
how comfortable do individuals feel talking openly with other members of the team
Marlow: Does Team Communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach? A meta-analysis of team communication & performance: What’s content analysis coded communication?
rater kategorisieren Inhalte der Kommunikation
Marlow: Does Team Communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach? A meta-analysis of team communication & performance: What’s information elaboration?
Ausmaß in dem Individuen thoroughly elaborate on information they share with team members
Marlow: Does Team Communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach? A meta-analysis of team communication & performance: Was waren die methodologischen Moderatoren? 5
Publication year
Performance Source
Communication Source
Type of Performance
Study Type
Marlow: Does Team Communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach? A meta-analysis of team communication & performance: Was waren die sample Moderatoren?
Sample type (students vs. employees)
average team size
average team organizational tenure
average team age
gender composition
Studienart (Feld, Labor)
Wie wurde Kommunikation/Leistung bewertet
Marlow: Does Team Communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach? A meta-analysis of team communication & performance: Was war die Stichprobe?
140 Artikel, 150 Studien
10.000 Teams
Marlow: Does Team Communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach? A meta-analysis of team communication & performace: Wie wurde ausgewertet=
Kategoriale Moderatoren: Random effects Meta-Analysis, Berechnung interkorrelationen/Korrelationen, Sample weighted mean correlation korrigiert auf beiden Seiten
kontinuierliche Moderatoren: Weighted least squares multiple regression
Marlow: Does Team Communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach? A meta-analysis of team communication & performance: Was waren die Hypothesen
H1 Zusammenhang Teamleistung & Kommunikation positiv (ja)
H2 Vertrautheit positiv (ja)
H3 Virtualität negativ (nur zwischen face-to-face und virtuell)
H4 Leadership Structure geteilt positiv (nein)
H5 Aufgabeninterdependenz (nein, fast alle Aufgaben interdependent)
H6 Aufgabentyp cognitive > action based (nein)
H7 Operationalisierung Qualität > Quantität (ja)
H8 Inhalt der Kommunikation aufgabeno > beziehungso (nein)
Marlow: Does Team Communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach? A meta-analysis of team communication & performance: Welche explorativen Moderatoren waren signifikant?
keine
Marlow: Does Team Communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach? A meta-analysis of team communication & performance: Wie war der Einfluss der Art der Kommunikation?
Am höchsten information elabboration, dann knowledge sharing (-> Qualität)
am niedrigsten objective frequency, self-reported frequency (-> Quantität)