Male Cancer NM Flashcards
Prostate cancer N
True pelvis below bifurcation of common iliac arteries
N1 - - stage IV
Prostate cancer M
Bone 90% - - lumbar spine >cervical - - M1b
Lung
Liver
Pleura
ISUP and Gleason
PSA
Nonspecific
Increase with age, size, prostatitis
Elevated - - rectal exam - - US, CT, MRI
TRUS - - >26 mm - - 92% detection rate
Doubling time >6 m– recurrence
Prostate cancer CT, MRI
CT - - staging in high volume disease
Not accurate for intraprostatic, local staging
MRI - - PI-RADS–local staging
Radionuclide therapy Lu177
Beta, 490 keV
Max tissue penetration 2 mm - - better irradiation
Gamma, 208 and 113 keV - - image
T1/2 6.73 days
3-8 GBq up to 6 injections at 6 weeks interval
Slow IV, 5 ml
Hydration before and after 1.5 l
Remain in hospital 2-4 h
Freeze salivary gland for 30 min before
Radionuclide therapy Ra223 dichloride
Xofigo
Alpha, penetration <100 microm - - lethal DNA damage - - lower hematological toxicity
T1/2 11.43 days
Indication: castration - resistant cancer, symptomatic bone MTS, no visceral MTS
Accumulate: bones, areas of high bone turnover
Slow IV, 3.85 MBq (194 microCi) for 70 kg
6 administrations at 4 weeks interval
Xofigo before treatment
Hb>10
Abs neutrophil count >1.5*10^9 l
PLT >100
Subsequent: abs neutrophil count >1, PLT > 50
No fast, well hydration
Stop Calcium, Phosp, Vit D for 4 days before and after
Xofigo objective marker of response
PSA and AlcPhos
Xofigo side effects
Fecal excretion > renal
Combi with chemo - - jaw osteonecrosis
Bone scan indication for prostate cancer
PSA>10 mg/ml
High Gleason
Locally advanced
Elevated AlcPhos
Bone symptoms
Monitor response to treatment
After treatment - - symptomatic patient or after biochemical recurrence
Bone scan sensitivity
More sensitive than CT
Sensitivity 75-95%
PSA >50 ng/mL - - up to 50% likely bone MTS
Bone scan false positive
Osteochondrosis
Inflammation
Trauma
Bone scan interpretation
Flare phenomenon - - between 2w and 3m after chemo - - good response
Continued increase >6 m - - disease progression - - superscan
Androgen deprivation therapy - - gynecomastia
F-fluoride PET/CT
F-NAF
Same mechanism and indication as bone scan
Response to treatment - - better performance than bone scan
Sensitivity 91%
Specificity 83%
40-100 microCi/kg, max 370 MBq for obese
Image 90-120 min after IV
Same interpretation
FDG PET for prostate cancer
Low grade - - low levels of GLUT1 - - low uptake
Aggressive - - high uptake - - poor prognosis
Biochemical recurrence - - high uptake