Making Mistakes Flashcards
Learnig outcomes
Explain why ‘whistleblowing’ in medicine can be difficult
Name common factors that contribute to basic error-making in medical practice, and understand the actions doctors can take to combat them
Contrast a person-centred approach and a systems-based approach to addressing medical errors, and give examples of each
Explain what is meant by ‘human factors’ and identify ways of reducing errors through a systems-based approach
Describe the Duty of Candour introduced in the Health (Tobacco, Nicotine etc. and Care) (Scotland) Bill, 2015
Describe the 4 steps involved in the Professional Duty of Candour (GMC & RMC Guidance, 2015)
Outline a doctor’s duty to the their patient and to their organisation when something goes wrong, as stated in the Professional Duty of Candour (p2, point 4, GMC & RMC Guidance, 2015)
Describe the three elements that comprise an action in negligence
Define the Bolam test and the Bolitho amendment and understand the implication of the ruling in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board (2015) on the issue of consent
Identify weaknesses in the current clinical negligence system
State some stats on errors in medicine
Scientific American report, 2009 (Harmon, Aug 10th)
200 000 deaths/yr in US due to preventable mistakes and infections
And in the UK?
(all from Jackson-quoted studies, p154)
• 10% of hospital inpatients suffer an adverse event
• One study estimated that nearly a third of all adverse events
led to moderate or great disability or death
• 10 000 serious adverse reactions to drugs are reported/year
Why do basic errors happen?
- Stress
- Fatigue
- Covering for colleagues (too little locum support)
- Professional culture (unwillingness to use support structures)
- Feeling that decisions must be made alone
- Unable to admit to uncertainty
Why is it difficult to admit andreport errors in medicine
- Consequences:
- Does error = incompetence? (after all, everyone makes mistakes…)
- Whistle-blowing is not without risk (far from it in fact…)
- Medicine is not an exact science
- Some argue that there is a “norm of non-criticism”
Prof Don Berwick: “Climate of fear” in the NHS is the single biggest barrier to patient safety
What is the Francis Report?
• Published February 2013
• Robert Francis, QC – public inquiry (£13 million)
• Stafford Hospital
• “They (Stafford Hospital patients) were failed by a system which ignored the warning signs and put corporate self-interest and cost control ahead of patients and their safety.“
• 290 recommendations including:
– Duty of Candour: A statutory obligation on doctors and nurses for a duty of candour so they are open with patients about mistakes
Discuss the duty of candour
Law: organisational Duty of Candour
• ‘To place a duty of candour on health and social care organisations. This would create a legal requirement for health and social care organisations to inform people when they have been harmed as a result of the care or treatment they have received.
• To establish new criminal offences of ill-treatment or wilful neglect in
health and social care settings; one offence applying to individual health and social care workers, managers and supervisors, and another applying to organisations’
• RCPE – supportive of both the above (written evidence, August 2015)
What is the Duty of Candour (2015)’s stance on apologising
An apology is a statement of sorrow or regret in respect for the unintended or unexpected incident
And apology or other step taken in accordance with the duty of candour procedure […] does not itself amount to an admission of negligence or a brach of statutory duty
What must a healthcare professional do in regards to the Duty of Candour (2015)
- tell the patient (or, where appropriate, the patient’s advocate, carer or family) when something has gone wrong
- apologise to the patient (or, where appropriate, the patient’s advocate, carer or family)
- offer an appropriate remedy or support to put matters right (if possible)
- explain fully to the patient (or, where appropriate, the patient’s advocate, carer or family) the short and long term effects of what has happened.
What might happen in response to errors or inadequate care?
- Negligence (legal approach): patient might take legal action
- NHS Complaints Procedure: patient might make a complaint
- GMC (professional body): disciplinary action or removal from register
What are the four outcomes from a GMC investigation
- Case concluded, no further action
- Issue a warning
- Agree undertakings
-Refer to MPTS (Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service)
E.g. sexual assault or indecency, violence, improper sexual or emotional relationships, knowingly practising without a licence, unlawfully discrimination, dishonest and gross negligence, recklessness about a risk of serious harm to patients, custodial or non-custodial conviction, caution or a determination from another regulatory body, refuses to agree undertakings.
-No action/Undertakings/Conditions/Suspension/Erasure
Discuss the legal basis of negligence
The claimant must establish:
1. He/she is owed a duty of care by the defendant
2. That the defendant breached that duty by failing to provide
reasonable care; and
3. That the breach of duty caused the claimant’s injuries
(causation), and that those injuries are not too remote (proximity).
(p104, Medical Law – Emily Jackson)
What is reasonable care?
The Bolam (1957) test: “A doctor is not guilty of negligence if he has acted in accordance with a practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical men skilled in that particular art.” Judge McNair (p113, Ibid)
The Bolitho (1997) test: Modified Bolam to add: the professional opinion must be capable of withstanding logical analysis (note: a move away from the deferential approach of Bolam) (p115, Ibid)
NB: Problem of inexperience
What is the impact of Montgomery (2015) (SoC in informed consent)
Daniel Sokol (BMJ, 2015):
“The law now requires a doctor to take ‘reasonable care to
ensure that the patient is aware of any material risks involved in
any recommended treatment, and of any reasonable alternative
or variant treatments.’ …
Three questions:
• Does the patient know about the material risks of the
treatment I’m proposing?
• Does the patient know about reasonable alternatives to this
treatment?
• Have I taken reasonable care to ensure that the patient
actually knows this?”
What is the Montgomery (2015) case?
“Nadine Montgomery, a woman with diabetes and of small stature, delivered her son vaginally; he experienced complications owing to shoulder dystocia, resulting in hypoxic insult with consequent cerebral palsy. Her obstetrician had not disclosed the increased risk of this complication in vaginal delivery, despite Montgomery asking if the baby’s size was a potential problem.” From: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j2224
What is causation in negligence?
There must be a clear link between the action (or inaction) of a
doctor, and the harm the patient experienced
• a key factor is also proximity
Often causation is where a patient’s case may fail
If not eligible for negligence, but not happy with care – NHS
complaints procedure