machine QA Flashcards

1
Q

describe E2E test for stereo

A

Use hidden targets in a phantom
Localize with CT/MR and complete a treatment plan
Treat with beams and also use film to get exposure
Displacement of image of target from radiation exposure should be < 1 mm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How do you measure dose profile for gamma knife?

A

plug 200 of 201 collimators and use film dosimetry. Also plug all 201 collimators to get background.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

definition of nominal stereo

A

sphere within which gantry, couch, collimator intersect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what tests should be performed for new ion chambers

A

-stem effect (worse for small fields)
-radiographs for mechanical soundness
-leakage current (10 ^ -14) A
-quantify stem effect
-microphonics- place cables etc under stress and test of current measured changes
-measure radiation equilibration time – at most 2 X 200 cGy readings
-test atmospheric communication- chamber should obey ideal gas law
-ensure polarity effect < 1 %
-measure collection efficiency; recombination should be < 1.02
-check orientation dependence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

pros and cons of diodes

A

-smaller volumes and higher sensitivity than ion chambers
-include silicion (high Z) which leads to energy dependence
-directional dependence
-lose sensitivity over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

pros and cons of diamond detectors

A

-almost soft-tssue equivalent, but higher density than water 93.5 g/cm3)
-very sensitive
-good mechanical stability
-sensitivy doesn’t change with radiation
-small directional dependence
-dose rate dependence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

desriable properties of electrometers

A

accurate, linear, stable, sensitive, high impedance, low leakage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are the options for 2D dosimetry

A

film, computed radiography, diode arrays, ion chamber arrays

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

List TG-142 tests where constraints for stereo are different than for conventional

A

o Daily:
 Laser localization: 2, 1.5, 1 mm
 Collimator size indicator: 2, 2, 1 mm
o Monthly:
 Couch position indicators: 2 mm/1º, 2 mm/1º, 1 mm/0.5º
 Lasers: 2, 1, <1 mm
o Annual:
 Coincidence of mechanical and radiation isocenters: 2, 2, 1 mm from baseline
o Daily imaging:
 Positioning/repositioning for planar kV, EPID MV: 2, 2, 1 mm
 Imaging and Tx coordinate coincidence for all: 2, 2, 1 mm
o Monthly imaging:
 Imaging and Tx coordinate coincidence for planar kV, EPID MV: 2, 2, 1 mm
 Planar kV scaling accuracy: 2, 2, 1 mm
 CBCT geometric distortion: 2, 2, 1 MM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how do you check that the ion chamber is on CAX?

A

take measurements by rotating collimator at different angles
-if not at CAX, readings will be different because x and y jaws are at different heights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

consideration for FFF beam (additional correction)

A

Prp correction from TG51 addendum
/(average field intensity across chamber sensitive volume, normalized to 1 at centre of sensitive volume)  Prp will be >1 to correct for doses being generally lower away from CAX for FFF beams.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

how to use shielded diodes?

A

scan direction matters, especially with shielded diodes since the shielded is not uniform around the active material. Should scan right-left, then scan left-right, and then average the two scans (this is referred to as hysteresis)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

2 things you can get from starshot test

A

-size of radiation isocenter
-distance from radiation isocenter to mechanical isocenter (must put bb at intersection of crosshairs to indicate where mechanical isocentre is)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

2 competing effects for Pfluence in electron beams

A

-in-scatter effect which increases f;luence in the cavity because electrons are not scattered out by the gas in the cavity
-obliquity effect- decreases fluence in cavity because electrons go straight instead of being scattered

Pfl < 1 which means the in-scatter dominates, making the observed fluence too large. Note that the correction is
very large at low-energies or for large diameter chambers and in this case it is best to use plane-parallel chambers with large guard rings.

-dominance of in-scattering over out-scattering gives rise to increase of fluence towards back of cavity and hence an increase ovf the reading of an ion chamber where electrons can enter at different dephts (i.e. cylindrical ones)

-PP chambers reduce fluence effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

why do we monitor the pulse rate with the reference chamber?

A

so that we can account for any pulse drops in the flatness/symmetry scan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

where do you get best measure of flatness/symmetry?

A

horn on beam profile (as opposed to 10 cm depth)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

where should reference chamber be placed?

A

in corner of treatment field but not too close to the scan chamber (as it cause cause scatter into the measurement area)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

how much does output change with FS at 10 cm depth?

A

87 % for 4x4, 110% at 20x20, and 119 % for 40x40 compared to 10x10

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

how is scatter from the linac arm compensatred for?

A

-older true beams and clinac have a correction factor for scatter from the linac arm; newer true beams have a lead coating to minimize the effects of this scatter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

define hysteresis

A

the dependence of the state of a system on its history. For example, a magnet may have more than one possible magnetic moment in a given magnetic field, depending on how the field changed in the past

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

if you drift 10% on unservoed dose rate, how much would you drift on servoed dose rate

A

1%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

acceptable electrometer leakage

A

0.1 pA without beam on
dose rate is significant if electrometer is leaky- a slower dose rate can give a larger reading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

how to tune machine if it is running hot?

A

increase gain- machine collects more charge- machine runs less hot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

why does linac output almost always trend up?

A

ion chambers leak air over time
-chamber doesn’t collect as much charge with less air so the machine pushes out more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

linac output is trending down- what could it be?

A

hole in target

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

what QA is required if you switch ion chamber on linac

A

annual QA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

how does dose rate affect recombination?

A

-faster dose rate= short time interval of pulse vs ion collection time – more time for recombination to occur

-Pion = 1.006 on 6FFF TB4
-Pion = 1.003 on 6x TB4
-Pion ~ 1.01 for electron beams

-different because dose/pulse of low E beams is 0.03 cGy/pulse
0.06 cGy/pulse for FF beams
0.08 cGy/pulse for electron beams

Dose per pulse in the unit of monitor units per pulse (MU/pulse) is dose rate (MU/min) divided by pulse rate (pulse/min). Since pulse rate of the linear accelerator for the same nominal energy does not change, Pion becomes a function of the dose rate of the photon beams.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

2 types of reombination

A

initial and general recombination. The former process occurs most likely in densely ionized track such as α‐particles and is independent of dose rate. The latter process occurs when positive and negative ions from different tracks re‐combine on their way to the collecting electrode and is dose‐rate dependent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

dosimetric advantages of FFF

A

lower head scatter and lower out‐of‐field radiation

-FFF has similar dmax to FF because less electron contamination pushes dmax in but softer beam pushes it more shallow- combined effects

Also, variation in output factor is reduced when the filter is removed. Sc can change ~ 8 % when the field is changed from 3x3 to 40x40. This is reduced to 1-3% for FFF. Also, energy spectrum is essentially the same across the profile of FFF beams. Leaf transmission also reduced because of softer beam spectrum, which can improve calcs for some plans.
-With IMRT, filter not required since MLCs deliberately modulate intensity of beam- can get higher dose rate by using FFF
-may increase skin dose since beam isn’t being hardened

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

daily electron and x-ray output constancy

A

3 %, TG 142

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

daily laser localization

A

2 mm non IMRT
1.5 mm 1MRT
1 mm SRS/SBRT
TG-142

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Daily ODI treshold

A

2 mm non IMRT
2 mm IMRT
2 mm SRS/SBRT
TG-142

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

daily colli size indicator

A

2 mm non IMRT
2 mm IMRT
1 mm SRS/SBRT
TG142

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

daily safety checks

A

door interlock
beam off
LPO interlock
key turns beam off
LPO times out
indicator lights
audiovisual monitors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

monthly electron and x-ray output treshold,
backup monitor chamber constancy

A

2%
TG142

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

monthly dose rate constancy

A

2%
TG142

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

monthly photon and electron beam profile constancy

A

1%
TG142

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

monthly energy constancy

A

1%
TG142

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Monthly light/rad coincidence

A

2 mm or 1 % on a side for symmetric
1 mm or 1 % on a side for asymmetric
TG142

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

monthly distance check for lasers

A

1 mm for stereo and IMRT, 2 mm for 3D
TG142

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

monthly gantry/colli indicators

A

1 degree
TG142

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Monthly jaw position indicators

A

2 mm symmetric
1 mm asymmetric
TG142

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Monthly cross-hair walkout

A

1 mm
TG142

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Monthly treatment couch position indicators

A

2 mm/1 degree
1 mm/0.5 degrees for stereo
TG142

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

monthly respiratory gating tests

A

beam outpout constancy within 2 %
-phase amplitude, beam control work
respiratory monitoring works
gating interlock works

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

annual x-ray and electron flatness and symmetry change from basline

A

1%
TG142

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Annual SRS arc rotation mode

A

monitor units set vs delivered, 1 MU or 2% (whichever is greater)
gatry arc sec vs delivered 1 degree of 2 % (whichver is greater)
TG142

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

annual output calibration

A

1%
TG142

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

Spot check of field size dependent output factors for photons (annual)

A

2% for FS < 4X4
1 % for FS > 4X4
TG142

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

Ouput factors for electron applicators
(1 FS/energy)
annual

A

2 % from baseline
TG142

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

annual x-ray beam quality

A

1 % from baseline
PDD10 or TMR20/TMR10
TG142

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

annual electron beam quality

A

R50
within 1 mm
TG142

53
Q

annual physical wedge transmission accuracy

A

2%
TG142

54
Q

annual electron monitor unit linearity

A

2 % if > 5 MU

TG142

55
Q

annual x-ray monitor unit linearity

A

2 % if > 5 MU
5 % if 2-4 MU
TG142

56
Q

ANNUAL x-ray output constancy vs dose rate

A

2 % from baseline
tg142

57
Q

annual electron OR X-RAY output constancy vs gantry angle

A

1% from baseline
TG142

58
Q

annual electron and x-ray OAF constancy vs gantry angle

A

1% from baseline
TG142

59
Q

annual PDD or TMR and OAF constancy for TBI/TSET

A

1% (TBI) or 1 mm (TSET) shift from baseline
TG142

60
Q

annual TBI/TSET output calibration

A

2% from baseline
TG142

61
Q

ANNUAL TBI/TSET accesorries

A

2% from baseline
TG142

62
Q

Annual colli rotation isocenter

A

1 mm from baseline
TG142

63
Q

annual gantry rotation isocenter

A

1 mm from baseline
TG142

64
Q

annual couch rotation isocenter

A

1 mm from baseline
TG142

65
Q

Annual coincidence of mechanical and radiation isocenter

A

2 mm
1 mm for stereo
TG142

66
Q

Annual table top sag

A

2 mm
TG142

67
Q

Annual beam energy constancy for respiraoty gating

A

2%

68
Q

annual temporal accuracy of phase/amplitude gate on
annual calibration of surrogate for respiraroty phase/amplitude
interlock testing for gating

A

100 ms of expected
100 ms of expected
interlock functional
TG142

69
Q

MLC qualitative test (like picket fence)

A

weekly
look for visible deviations

70
Q

monthly MLC leaf tests TG142

A

setting vs radiation field for 2 patterns (within 2 mm)
travel speed- loss of lead speed > 0.5 cm/s fails
leaf position accuracy within 1 mm for four cardinal gantry angles

71
Q

annual MLC transmission (average of leaf and interleaf transmission, all energies)

A

0.5 % from baseline
TG142

72
Q

Annual MLC leaf position repeatability

A

1 mm
TG142

73
Q

Annual MLC spoke shot

A

1 mm radius
TG142

74
Q

annual MLC Coincidence of light field and x-ray field (all energies)

A

2 mm
TG-142

75
Q

segmental IMRT step and shoot test, annual for MLC

A

< 0.35 cm max , error RMS, 95% of error counts < 0.35 cm
TG142

76
Q

MLC annual test moving window IMRT (4 cardinal gantry angles)

A

< 0.35 cm max, error RMS, 95% of error counts < 0.35 CM
TG142

77
Q

daily kV/MV imaging QA

A

collision interlocks
positioning/repositoning < 2mm, <1 mm for stereo
imaging and treatment coordinate coincidence, < 2 mm, <1 mm stereo
TG142

78
Q

Daily CBCT imaging QA

A

collision interlocks
positioning/repositoning < 2mm, <1 mm for stereo
imaging and treatment coordinate coincidence, < 2 mm, <1 mm stereo
TG142

79
Q

Monthly planar MV QA

A

imaging and treatment coordinate coincidence, <2 mm, < 1 mm stereo
scaling < 2mm

spatial res., contrast, uniformity and noise are baseline

TG142

80
Q

monthly planar kV imaging QA

A

imaging and treatment coordinate coincidence, <2 mm, < 1 mm stereo
scaling < 2mm, < 1 mm if stereo

spatial res., contrast, uniformity and noise are baseline

TG142

81
Q

CBCT monthly imaging QA

A

geometric distortion < 2mm, < 1 mm if stereo
spatial res., contrast, HU constancy, uniformity and noise all baseline

TG142

82
Q

annual planar MV imaging QA

A

full travel SSD within 5 mm
imaging dose is baseline

TG142

83
Q

annual planar kV imaging QA

A

beam quality/energy and imaging dose are baseline

TG142

84
Q

annual CBCT QA

A

imaging dose is baseline

TG142

85
Q

CPQR daily lasers/crosshairs

A

1 mm tolerance, 2 mm action

86
Q

CPQR daily optical distance indicator

A

1 mm tolerance, 2 mm action

87
Q

optical back pointer CPQR daily

A

2 mm tolerance, 3 mm action

88
Q

CPQR daily field definition jaws/MLC leaves

A

1 mm tolerance, 2 mm action

89
Q

CPQR daily output constancy photons and electrons

A

2% tolerance, 3 % fail

90
Q

CPQR daily wedge factors

A

2% tolerance, 3 % action

91
Q

CPQR mothly gantry and colli angle readout

A

0.5 degree tolerance, 1 degree action

92
Q

CPQR monthly cross-hair centering/ colli rotation isocenter

A

1 mm tolerance, 2 mm fail

this is diameter (fail matches TG142 condition of radius of 1 mm)

93
Q

CPQR couch position readout monthly

A

1 mm tolerance, 2 mm fail

94
Q

CPQR couch rotation isocenter monthly

A

1 mm tolerance, 2 mm fail

95
Q

CPQR couch isocentric angle monthly

A

0.5 degrees tolerance, 1 degree action

96
Q

CPQR optical distance indicator monthly

A

1 mm tolerance, 2 mm action

97
Q

CPQR monthly relative dosimetry

A

2% tolerance, 3 % fail

98
Q

CPQR monthly central axis depth dose reproducibility

A

1%/2 mm tolerance
2%/3mm action

99
Q

CPQR monthly beam profile constancy

A

2% tolerance, 3 % action

constancy can be calculated as an average value of chosen off axis points in the beam profile

100
Q

CPQR monthly light to rad coincidence

A

1 mm tolerance, 2 mm action

101
Q

CPQR monthly jaw position accuracy

A

1 mm tolerance, 2 mm action

102
Q

CPQR monthly MLC leaf position accuracy

A

1 mm tolerance, 2 mm action

103
Q

CPQR dynamic leaf position accuracy monthly (picket fence)

A

0.5 mm tolerance, 1 mm action

104
Q

CPQR dynamic MLC fluence delivery (i.e. verification)
monthly

A

95 % <3%/3 mm tolerance
95 % <5%/3 mm action

105
Q

CPQR annual profile reproducibility

A

2% tolerance, 3 % action

106
Q

CPQR annual depth dose reproducibility

A

1% tolerance, 2 % action

107
Q

CPQR reference dosimetry annual

A

1% tolerance, 2 % action

108
Q

CPQR annual relative output factor reproducibility

A

1 % tolerance, 2 % action

109
Q

CPQR annual wedge and accessory transmission factor reproducibility

A

1 % tolerance, 2 % action

110
Q

CPQR annual wedge profile reproducibility

A

1 % tolerance, 2 % action

111
Q

CPQR profile and output reprducibility vs gantry angle

A

1% tolerance, 2 % action

112
Q

CPQR annual monitor chamber linearity

A

1%/1MU tolerance
2%/2MU action

113
Q

CPQR annual end monitor effect

A

0.5 MU tolerance
1 MU action

114
Q

CPQR annual collimator radiation isocenter

A

1 mm tolerance
2 mm action

115
Q

CPQR annual gantry rotation isocenter (mechanical and radiation)

A

1 mm tolerance
2 mm action

116
Q

CPQR annual couch rotation isocenter (radiation)

A

1 mm tolerance
2 mm action

117
Q

CPQR annual coincidence of mechanical and radiation isocenters

A

1 mm tolerance
2 mm action

118
Q

CPQR annual coincidence of axes of rotation

A

1 mm tolernce
2 mm action

119
Q

CPQR annual couch delfection

A

3 mm tolerance
5 mm action

120
Q

CPQR annual leaf transmission (all energies)

A

1% tolerance
2 % action

121
Q

CPQR annual leakeage between leaves (all energies)

A

2% tolerance
3% action

122
Q

CPQR annual transmission through abutting leaves

A

2% tolerance
3% action

123
Q

CPQR annual leaf alignment with jaws

A

0.5 degree tolerance
1 degree action

124
Q

CPQR annual dosimetric leaf gap

A

0.2 mm tolerance
0.3 mm action

125
Q

what is dosimetric leaf gap

A

plot MLC leaf transmission as function of gap width
extrapolate width for which transmission = 0

126
Q

why do we QA couch sag?

A

a shift of the entire couch is not a big deal because we have imaging. However, if the couch sags un-evenly, the beam could land obliquely on the patient- could have dosimetric consequences

127
Q

can you still treat if a laser stops working?

A

theoretically can’t treat according to TG142, but in reality we have imaging such that we could treat safely

128
Q

describe a clinical scenario where light to rad test is relevant

A
  • Back in the days before imaging, might set up a patient using the light field. In this case, if we have 2 mm uncertainty on each side (per light to rad requirement), could potentially be 4 mm off at the junction of the 2 fields (cranial spinal)
129
Q

why would field sizes fail QA or L2R test?

A

-mirror that bends the light (light cannot go through beam!) could be badly placed; light source could be badly placed