Lyubkh

Question 1

Lyubkh: A Meta-Analysis of Leadership and Workplace Safety: Examining Relative
Importance, Contextual Contingencies, and Methodological Moderators: Was waren die Hypothesen?

Answer 1

H1: positive Beziehung mit Arbeitsplatzsicherheit haben change, task & relational oriented (ja)
H2: negative Beziehung haben passive & destructive (teilweise ja)
H3: Viel Varianzaufklärung auf proximale Arbeitsplatzsicherheitskonstrukte haben task (jein), relational (jein), wenig haben change (jein), passive (nein), destructive (jein)
H4: Low Power distance => stärkerer Zusammenhang change (ja), relational (nein), destructive (ja), => schwächer: task (nein), passive (ja)
H5: in High Risk schwächer (ja): change, relational, destructive, stärker: task (ja), passive (nein)

Question 2

Lyubkh: A Meta-Analysis of Leadership and Workplace Safety: Examining Relative
Importance, Contextual Contingencies, and Methodological Moderators: Was waren die offenen Forschungsfragen?

Answer 2

Moderatoren:
1. age-group
2. Safety-Specific vs. general leadership
3. methodologische (Publikationsstatus, Studiendesign, Analyselevel)

Question 3

Lyubkh: A Meta-Analysis of Leadership and Workplace Safety: Examining Relative
Importance, Contextual Contingencies, and Methodological Moderators: Sind age groups Moderatorvariable?

Answer 3

Lifespan Theory bestätigt

Question 4

Lyubkh: A Meta-Analysis of Leadership and Workplace Safety: Examining Relative
Importance, Contextual Contingencies, and Methodological Moderators: ist kontextualisiert besser?

Answer 4

für einige bestätigt
möglicherweise wegen ähnlichem Wording
=> weniger Outcomes

Question 5

Lyubkh: A Meta-Analysis of Leadership and Workplace Safety: Examining Relative
Importance, Contextual Contingencies, and Methodological Moderators: Was waren die Ergebnisse für die methodologischen moderatoren?

Answer 5

Publication Bias teilweise
Common-Method Variance Teilweise
Analyselevel teilweise

Question 6

Lyubkh: A Meta-Analysis of Leadership and Workplace Safety: Examining Relative
Importance, Contextual Contingencies, and Methodological Moderators
Was war der theoretische Hintergrund? 6

Answer 6

Theory of Performance (Workplace Safety Taxonomy)
Regulatory Focus Theory (Prevention and Promotion foci drive amployees’ sagety-related reactions)
Implicit Leadership Theory (was zu Prototyp passt, funktioniert besser)
Situational Leadership Theory (Kompetenz & Willingness => Readiness -> wie viel Direction/Support braucht Person)
Lifespan Theories (individuelle Werte & Motivationen variieren über Lebensabschnitte)
Leadership Contingency Theory (Effektivität je nach situationaler Passung)

Question 7

Lyubkh: A Meta-Analysis of Leadership and Workplace Safety: Examining Relative
Importance, Contextual Contingencies, and Methodological Moderators: Welche Methodologischen Moderatoren gab es?

Answer 7

Publication status
Study Design
Level of Analysis

Question 8

Lyubkh: A Meta-Analysis of Leadership and Workplace Safety: Examining Relative
Importance, Contextual Contingencies, and Methodological Moderators: Welche kontextuellen Moderatoren gab es?

Answer 8

Power Distance
Industry Risk
Mitarbeitendenalter
Safety-specifiv vs. general leadership

Question 9

Lyubkh: A Meta-Analysis of Leadership and Workplace Safety: Examining Relative
Importance, Contextual Contingencies, and Methodological Moderators: Welche Führungsverhalten wurden untersucht?

Answer 9

Passive Leadership
Destructive Leadership
Relational-oriented
change-oriented
task-oriented

Question 10

Lyubkh: A Meta-Analysis of Leadership and Workplace Safety: Examining Relative
Importance, Contextual Contingencies, and Methodological Moderators: Was ist die Safety Taxonomy?

Answer 10

Greifbar: Safety Outcomes
Safety Performance: Participation & Compliance
Proximal: Safety Motivation, Knowledge
Distal (proximal für Führungsverhalten): Einstellungen, Klima

Question 11

Lyubkh: A Meta-Analysis of Leadership and Workplace Safety: Examining Relative
Importance, Contextual Contingencies, and Methodological Moderators: Was sind praktische Implikationen?

Answer 11

Mischung aus Task- und relational-oriented am besten

Question 12

Lyubkh: A Meta-Analysis of Leadership and Workplace Safety: Examining Relative
Importance, Contextual Contingencies, and Methodological Moderators: Was sind Future Direction=

Answer 12

mögliche kurvilineare Beziehung zu Führungsverhalten testen
Geschlechtereffekte
Shared Leadership

Question 13

Lyubkh: A Meta-Analysis of Leadership and Workplace Safety: Examining Relative
Importance, Contextual Contingencies, and Methodological Moderators: Was sind Schwächen?

Answer 13

75% Männer
keine Pfadanalysen -> Kausalität?
Nur signifikante Moderatoreffekte berücksichtigt
Klassifizierung junge Stichprobe

Question 14

Lyubkh: A Meta-Analysis of Leadership and Workplace Safety: Examining Relative
Importance, Contextual Contingencies, and Methodological Moderators: Was war die Auswertungsmethode?

Answer 14

H1 & H2: Bivariate Analysen von Effektstärken (I^2 als wie viel Prozent der totalen Variabilität in einem Set von Effektstärken liegt an wahrer Heterogenität)
H3: Relative Weight Analysis (Epsilon)
Moderatoranalysen: Between-Level Q-Tests (signifikant, wenn Between group differenzen mehr Varianz erklären als within-group)

Question 15

Lyubkh: A Meta-Analysis of Leadership and Workplace Safety: Examining Relative
Importance, Contextual Contingencies, and Methodological Moderators: Was war die Stichprobe?

Answer 15

200 Samples
N = 100.000

Question 16

Lyubkh: A Meta-Analysis of Leadership and Workplace Safety: Examining Relative
Importance, Contextual Contingencies, and Methodological Moderators: Was waren die Ergebnisse

Answer 16

Task oriented am wichtigsten, dann relational oriented
passiv relativ wichtig
Wo Gleichheit kein hoher Wert: Mitarbeitende weniger empfänglich für Führung, die sich an change orientiert, toleratnter für destructive Leadership, weniger tolerant für passive
Publication Bias & Common Method Variance
Für Sicherheitskonstrukte mit Selbstfokus (Attitudes, Knowledge): relational, mit Fremdfokus (Climate, Motivation): task am wichtigsten