Lesson 8- Accuracy of EWT (anxiety) Flashcards
What is anxiety?
Anxiety- πͺ emotional π & physical effects on π witness
Which psychologists investigated emotional arousal & peformance and when?
Yerkes & Dodson (1908)
What did Yerkes & Dodson come up with?
Yerkes & Dodson (1908) Law- emotional arousal & performance- inverted U:
β Low anxiety = low accuracy
β Medium anxiety = optimal accuracy
β High anxiety = low accuracy
Who supported Yerkes & Dodsonβs Law?
Daffenbacher (1983)- supports Law
What is an example of high anxiety an eye witness could feel?
Weapon focus effect:
1) Crime committed- π witness watching event- medium anxiety
2) Criminal pulls out weapon πͺ- anxiety levels β¬οΈ as π witness focuses on weapon πͺ- possibility to miss other details- zones in focus on weapon
Who investigated evidence into the weapon focus effect and when?
Johnson & Scott (1976)
What Johnson & Scott do?
Pps sat outside lab π§ͺ & heard 1 of 2 conditions:
1) Friendly conversation- π¨ emerging carrying π with greasy π π€ (β¬οΈ anxiety)
2) Argument- smashing glass- overturned furniture πͺ- π¨ emerging carrying π©Έstained paper πͺ (β¬οΈ anxiety)
Pps- had to identify criminal- based on 50 photos
What did Johnson & Scott find?
1) 49% accurate in identifying π¨ with π
2) 33% accurate in identifying π¨ with πͺ
β¦ shows β¬οΈ anxiety = worse recall because π witnesses focused on weapon πͺ rather than criminal face
Which psychologists produced a counter study which showed high anxiety = high recall and when?
COUNTER study- β¬οΈ anxiety = good recall- Christianson & Hubinette (1993)
What did the study that looked at high anxiety meaning high recall do and what did it find?
1) Questioned 58 real π witnesses (either victims or bystanders) about π¦ robbery in Sweden πΈπͺ
2) Most anxious π₯ π witnesses (victims) had best recall- suggests β¬οΈ stress = better recall/detail
What are the evaluation points for the affects of anxiety on EWT?
π- weapon πͺ focus βοΈ caused by anxiety BUT surprise- Pickel (1998)- pps watch thief enter hairdressing πβββ carrying 1) βοΈ (β¬οΈ threat β¬οΈ surprise), 2) π« (β¬οΈ threat β¬οΈ surprise), 3) wallet (β¬οΈ threat β¬οΈ surprise), 4) whole raw π π (β¬οΈ threat β¬οΈ surprise)- identification least accurate in β¬οΈ surprise conditions rather than β¬οΈ threat
π- Ethical issues- psychological harm created through anxiety- necessary when real life events can also create anxiety?- π©Έ πͺ
π- Field studies lack control- natural studies (e.g. Christianson & Hubinette)- confounding variables effect results- ppl closest to incident experienced β¬οΈ anxiety BUT β¬οΈ accurate- clearly π
ALSO extraneous variables e.g. post event discussion- affected/changed π witness recall- β¬οΈ difficult to conclude effect of anxiety of EWT accuracy
π- individual differences- rather than anxiety- personality traits allow certain people- stay calm under pressure β¦ β¬οΈ accurate. Anxiety & recall effect ppl differently- results βοΈ generalised to everyone