Lesson 1: LTM & STM Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define Memory

A

Memory- process by which info encoded, stored & retrieved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define STM

A

STM- stores & allows recall of info- 18-30 seconds (without rehearsal)- capacity limited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define LTM

A

LTM- stores & recall info- distant past- capacity unlimited- duration lifetime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define Capacity

A

Capacity- how much info held/stored

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define Coding

A

Coding- form in which info stored in memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define Duration

A

Duration- how long info stored/lasts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Who investigated STM duration and when?

A

Peterson & Peterson (1959)- STM Duration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Peterson & Peterson do in their study?

A

1) 24 pps presented with consonant trigrams e.g. ZFB
2) Asked to count backwards- ✖️ rehearsal of consonant trigram
3) Counted back for 3,6,9,12,15,18 seconds & then repeat trigram
4) Repeated using other trigrams

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were Peterson & Peterson’s results?

A

90% remembered after 3 seconds
20% after 9 seconds
⬇️ than 10% after 18 seconds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did Peterson & Peterson conclude?

A

Info decays rapidly when ✖️ rehearsed
Initially concluded- 18 second max duration
Later concluded- 18-30 second max duration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were the evaluation points to Peterson & Peterson’s study?

A

👎- trigrams unrealistic to remember… ⬇️ ecological validity- findings ✖️ apply to everyday life
👍- lab 🧪 experiment- good control of variables … can be replicated to test reliability of results
👍- confusion created among earlier trigrams … results gained from forgetting or confusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Who investigated LTM duration and when?

A

Bahrick et al (1975)- LTM Duration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did Bahrick et al do?

A

1) 400 🇺🇸 pps- remember former classmates

2) Identify pics, matching names to pics & recall names without picture cue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What were Bahrick et al’s results?

A

70% accuracy when linking names & faces

30% accuracy with free call of names

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did Bahrick et al conclude?

A

Suggests LTM duration of lifetime (still remembered after 30-50 years)
All info ✖️ immediately accessible- pps required cues to trigger info stored in LTM
Recall ⬆️ with cues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What were the evaluation points of Bahrick et al’s study?

A

👎- natural experiment- experimenter ⬇️ control of IV- confounding variables may affect results- e.g name rehearsal via classmates in touch 📞- … results possibly invalid
👍- natural experiment- meaningful material- everyday task- … ⬆️ ecological validity
👎- names of classmates- typically ⬆️ rehearsed- very specific type of info

17
Q

Which 2 psychologists/studies investigated STM capacity and when?

A

1) Jacobs (1887)- STM Capacity

2) Miller (1956)- STM Capacity

18
Q

What did Jacobs do?

A

1) Serial digit span technique
2) Researcher started with reading out 4 digits/letters
3) Pps had to repeat back
4) Researcher continued adding 1 more digit/letter until pps ✖️ repeat back

19
Q

What were Jacob’s results?

A

9 digits & 7 letters recalled
As age ⬆️, capacity ⬆️- ⬆️ 🧠 capacity, development of strategies (chunking)
Digits easier to recall (only 10) BUT 26 letters

20
Q

What did Jacobs conclude?

A

Capacity fairly limited

21
Q

What were the evaluation points of Jacobs study?

A

👎- ✖️ ecological validity- learning lists of numbers/letters ✖️ realistic … findings ✖️ apply real life- meaningful info recalled better?
👍- study repeated (Miller)- same results found … reliability- results replicated
👎- confusion among pps- previous sequences
👎- EV controlled?- Jacob’s study- long time ago

22
Q

What did Miller find?

A

Found capacity- 7+-2 items
Memory ⬆️ via chunking
Cowan (2001)- 4 chunks capacity- (lower end of 7+-2 items ⬆️ accurate)

23
Q

What are the 3 ways info is coded?

A

3 ways info coded:

1) Acoustic coding- sound 🎶
2) Semantic coding- meaning
3) Visual coding- looks 👀

24
Q

How is info in STM & LTM coded?

A

STM- encoded in mainly 🎶 form

LTM- encoded in mainly semantic form

25
Q

Who investigated coding in STM & LTM and when?

A

Baddeley (1966)- evidence for STM & LTM coding

26
Q

What did Baddeley do and find?

A

1) Pps shown sequence of 5 words- under 1 of following 4 conditions:
1. Acoustically similar words- immediately- least accurate for STM
2. Acoustically dissimilar words- ⬆️ accurate for STM
3. Semantically similar words- 20 min later- least accurate for LTM
4. Semantically dissimilar words- ⬆️ accurate for LTM

BUT info in STM & LTM can be stored in other forms e.g. visually 👀

27
Q

What are evaluation points for Baddeleys study?

A

👎- ⬇️ ecological validity- words- meaningless list- semantic coding works better when info ⬆️ meaningful … limits application to real life