Lesson 2: Methods of Philosophizing Flashcards

1
Q

to think or express oneself in a philosophical manner.

A

Philosophizing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

it is a truth which is based on reasoning and critical thinking.

A

Logic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

it is a philosophy that emphasizes the importance of free individual choice, regardless of the power of other people to influence and coerce our desires, beliefs, and decisions.

A

Existentialism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

It is said that the philosophy should apply logical techniques to attain conceptual clarity.

A

Analytic Tradition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who founded analytic tradition?

A

Gottlob Frege

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The word “phenomenon” comes directly from the Greek phainomenon, meaning “appearance.”

A

Phenomenology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

is a defect in an argument other than it is having false premises.

A

Fallacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the Kinds of Fallacy?

A
  • Informal Fallacies
  • Formal Fallacies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

are errors in reasoning due to solely to an incorrect form or structure of an argument.

A

Formal Fallacies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

also known as material fallacies, are errors in reasoning due solely to an anomaly or defect in the content of an argument.

A

Informal Fallacies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the Types of Informal Fallacies?

A

Fallacies of Ambiguity
Fallacies of Relevance
Fallacies of Presumption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

referring to fallacies in which the error in reasoning is brought about by occurrence of ambiguous terms whose meaning are confused in an argument.

A

Fallacies of Ambiguity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

referring to fallacies in which the error in reasoning is brought about by the irrelevance of the premise/s to the conclusion of an argument.

A

Fallacies of Relevance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

referring to fallacies in which the error in reasoning is brought about by occurrence of complex or loaded expressions whose assumptions are questioned or have not yet been proven to be true.

A

Fallacies of Presumption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Fallacies of Ambiguity

A
  • Equivocation
  • Composition
  • Division
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Fallacies of Relevance

A

Argument from Ignorance
Appeal to Inappropriate Authority
Appeal to the Person
Appeal to Pity
Appeal to Popular Will
Appeal to Force

17
Q

Fallacies of Presumption

A

Complex Question
Post Hoc
Petition Principii
Accident
Hasty Generalization

18
Q

It is committed when several meanings of a word or phrase become confused in the context of one argument.

A

Equivocation

19
Q

It is committed when one reasons from the qualities of the parts of a whole to the qualities to the whole itself.

A

Composition

20
Q

It is a reverse composition, is committed when one reasons from the qualities of a whole to the qualities of the parts of the whole.

A

Division

21
Q

It is committed when it is argued that a proposition is true simply on the basis that it has not been proven false, or that it is false because it has not proven true.

A

Argument from Ignorance

22
Q

It is committed when one appeals to an authority whose field of expertise does not include the nature of the conclusion being established.

A

Appeal to Inappropriate Authority

23
Q

It is committed when one applies a general rule to individual cases, which, because of their special or accidental nature, the general rule does not properly apply.

A

Accident

24
Q

It is committed when one appeals to force, often subtly, to cause the acceptance of a conclusion.

A

Appeal to Force

25
Q

It is committed when one evaluates an argument by means of citing something the person who asserts the said argument.

A

Appeal to the Person

26
Q

It is committed when one asks a question that contains unproven assumptions.

A

Complex Question

27
Q

It is committed when reasoning is circular in that the conclusion is already assumed in the premises.

A

Begging the Question

28
Q

It is committed when one attributes a wrong cause to something, which is often due to a mere temporal succession of two events.

A

False Cause