LECTURE THIRTEEN Flashcards

1
Q

SCHEMATA

A
  • Schema – mental model about the world and
    particular aspects about it (plural is schemata or
    schemas)
  • Schemata developed over lifetime
  • Becomes more fixed with age and experience
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

WHY SCHEMATA

A
  • Guides action
    Contain “scripts” of how the event should unfold and what you should do
  • Imagination
    Draw upon schema to imagine. how something would likely occur
  • Memory
    Schemata can be used to fill-in detail when remembering an event
  • However – this can also lead to memory distortions in accordance with schema
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

PREDICTIVE PROCESSING

A

“Grand unified theory” of the brain
* Brain is a prediction engine
* Predict next state of the world based on incoming sensory information and high-level models based on schemata
* If correct, great! If incorrect – revise that schema
* Over time, error correction revises schemata until accuracy is maximized using Bayesian principles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

BAYESIAN STATISTICS

A
  • Different way of thinking about statistics than what
    you might have been taught
  • Basic idea
  • You have some sort of new finding
  • Instead of looking at p-value in isolation (frequentist
    stats)…
  • …you consider likelihood of this finding, given all other
    scientific or worldly knowledge you have
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

SCHEMATA AND PREDICTION

A
  • Schemata function as predictive models
  • “Priors” and “models” are basically interchangeable with “schemata”
  • Allows for mind to predict outcome of action or event
    and explain sensory information
  • Better schemata = more accurate predictions/explanations
  • All levels of cognition, from low-level sensory priors to
    high-level judgements
    Hollow mask
    Confirmation bias
    Imagination and memory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

SCHEMATA

A
  • Schemata allow us to navigate the world in a
    cognitively efficient manner
  • But they can also distort memory and perception,
    in predictable ways
  • In addition, more fixed schemata = more fixed
    thinking; less open-mindedness and flexibility
  • This is all adaptive – but can result in errors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

WAR OF GHOST

A

A Native-American folktale
* British participants
* One participant read the story, then retold it to
another, etc. (think telephone)
* Serial reproductions
* Story lost detail over time (somewhat obvious)
* Also became more “Westernized” (not obvious)
* Instances of magic became more rational
* Distortions fit participants’ schema

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

INTRUSION ERROR

A
  • Recalling “xxx” in the prior example is an intrusion
    error
  • Based on schema that was activated (all words involved xxx)
  • Can also be visual
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

VISUAL INTRUSION ERROR

A
  • Gist – memory for overall meaning
  • Overall “meaning”, or high-level characteristics
  • Intrusion errors can arise from gist consistent
    information (which was not presented)
  • Intrusion errors fit with the general schema activated
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

RECONSTRUCTIVE MEMORY

A
  • Memory is NOT like a computer or video camera
  • Memory is a reconstructive process
  • We reconstruct memories when we retrieve them – active
    process of reconstruction
  • This is why we get intrusion errors
    and filling-in effects
  • Because world is mostly regular
    and align with schemata,
    reconstructive memory is mostly
    accurate…mostly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

SEVEN OF SINS

A
  1. Transience
    * Memories degrade with time
  2. Absent-mindedness
    * Memory is dependent upon attention
  3. Blocking
    * Irrelevant knowledge can interfere with retrieval
  4. Misattribution
    * Failure to remember where information was obtained (or when/where the event occurred for episodic)
  5. Suggestibility
    * Information from others distorts our own memory
  6. Bias
    * One’s current state influences memories of one’s past
  7. Persistence
    * Unwanted memories continuously retrieved (from faux pas to trauma)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

MISINFORMATION EFFECT

A
  • One implication of reconstructive memory is
    that our memories are not as reliable as we may think
  • Can be influenced by additional information and
    future knowledge
  • Loftus studies in eyewitness testimony
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

FLASHBULB MEMORIES

A
  • Memories for exceedingly emotional
    culturally shared events
  • Can vividly remember what you were doing
    and where you were when it happened
  • Challenger explosion study
  • They are not a special or different kind of memory
  • They are not always accurate
  • Highly emotional events are remembered better
    than neutral events…
  • But only the central details
  • Emotion may draw attention away from other details of the situation (weapon focus)
  • Confidence in memory veracity is not reliably
    related to accuracy!
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

REPRESSED MEMORIES

A
  • Traumatic events
  • Often childhood abuse
  • Comes out of psychoanalytic “Freudian” tradition –
    need for conscious mind to protect itself from unconscious trauma
  • “Repressed” for a long period of time (many years)
  • Recovered (usually with the guide of a therapist) later
    in life
  • Can have serious consequences
  • Cautionary tale – the McMartin Preschool case
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

TECHNIQUES USED

A
  • Authority and social influence
    “From your symptoms, I think that you were abused,
    even if you dont remember it.”
  • Guided imagery
    “Suppose you had been abused – try to picture what
    might have happened.”
  • Hypnotism
    Hypnotism increases suggestibility, but does not increase memory accuracy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

REPRESSED MEMORIES

A
  • Scientist-practitioner gap
  • Academic memory scholars usually deny repressed memories
  • Clinicians accept the possibility
  • Back to Freud – two possibilities
    for “repression”
  • TRUE repression – initial thought
  • Unconscious “locking” of memories
    without person realizing
  • No strong scientific evidence for this
    at this point
    WILLED repression – later thought
  • Person intentionally tries to forget/not
    think/talk about trauma
  • Plenty of evidence for this
16
Q

REPRESSED MEMORIES

A
  • Memory is reconstructive
  • Misinformation effect and imagination inflation
  • Confidence =/= accuracy
  • Most victims of trauma wish they could just “forget”
    (PTSD)
  • Counterpoint – dissociative state and state-dependent memory?
  • Controversial, to say the least
  • Is it possible to “retrieve” a false memory? – YES
  • Is it possible to retrieve a “forgotten” true memory? – YES
  • Best solution – other sources of evidence
17
Q

FUZZY-TRACE THEORY (FTT)

A
  • Falsely remembered information is consistent with
    gist of experience/stimuli
  • FTT – two components to memory – gist and
    verbatim recall
  • Stored/accessed in parallel
  • Dissociated (can have one w/o other)
  • Dual-opponent process
  • Gist supports false memory recall, verbatim true
  • Verbatim decays fast, gist slow
  • Developmental differences (gist increases when older
    since schemata dependent)
  • Importantly, “vivid” recall can be cued by either gist
    or verbatim recall
18
Q

FTT AND FALSE MEMORIES

A
  • False memories result from correct gist information and incorrect verbatim information
  • Phantom recollection
  • Gist resemblance is high between false info and memory
  • Comprehensive theory of false memory recall
19
Q

FTT AND ME

A
  • Gist is absolutely correct: None of these are confabulated (truly false) memories – more like memory distortions
  • Verbatim is wrong – but only partially: Becomes more wrong over time – this is where the
    “collective” part comes in. Incorrect verbatim aspect becomes ingrained, resulting in high degree of confidence
20
Q

COMMON FACTORS DURING MEs

A

Childhood (80s-90s for Millennials)
* Pop culture
* Gist consistent, verbatim incorrect (but plausible –
hence phantom recollection)
* Minor details in larger context
* Parodies/references consistent with ME
* Misattribution of verbatim information

21
Q

SOCIAL FACTORS

A
  • People don’t like being wrong
  • Especially when it comes to memory – unsettling
  • Reluctance to believe memories are false – but can be accepted
  • If I’m wrong, it could be me. But if a LOT of people are
    wrong in the same way, then MULTIVERSE
  • Internet allows for validation and spread of similar false memories which would normally be ignored
22
Q

WHY STUDY MANDELA EFFECT

A
  • Relation to LTM
  • Interference, not decay, at core of ME
  • Power of collective consciousness (media, internet) in shaping/validating individual memory
  • Relation to FTT and false memories
  • Bridge between pop psychology and research
  • Educational tool about false memories