Lecture 8- Dietary restraint and dieting Flashcards
Schachter’s Externality Theory
Externality causes obesity
Obese individuals:
Highly responsive to the sight and smell of foods and this motivated eating behavior
Less sensitive to internal cues
(External cues motivate eating behaviors)
‘Normal’ individuals:
Eating occurs in response to ‘internal signals’ (e.g., gastric contractions, hunger, and satiety)
More responsive to internal signals; gastric contractions and satiety
Set-point theory of obesity: Nisbett (1972)
Nisbett argued that the sensitivity that obese people have towards external environments, is a CONSEQUENCE of obesity
Idea is that everyone has different set points
Obese people keep their body weight below a biologically defended set point (in order to maintain lower weight; self-limiting food intake)
Ie. Obese people suppress their weight below its biologically appropriate set point value
They do this because of societal pressures to reduce their weight
They operate below a biologically determined set point which is higher than their actual body weight
Thus, they experience chronic hunger
Herman & Mack
Anyone who restricts their dietary intake (fat or thin) will experience exaggerated external responsiveness and impaired internal responsiveness.
Developed a Restraint scale to measure this tendency
Milkshake preloading
Unrestrained- responsive to their internal cues; reduce intake of ice-cream according to preloads
Restrained-ate more than unrestrained, after consuming larger preload
Preload forced restrained eaters to overeat (motivational collaspe, preload disrupted fragile resolve to inhibit eating)
Restrained eaters found a loss of inhibition (disinhibited eating)
Disinhibition
This idea that restrained eaters would be more responsive to foods and increase food intake after primer is called disinhibited eating
Polivy (1976)
How does the manipulation of calories affect the restraint of food in-take
High restrained eaters
The perception of high calorie foods (through the manipulation of a food label) also led to restrained eaters to eat a large number of sandwiches
Energy dense food (added calories) and manipulated food label led to increased food intake
THIS IS support for motivational collapse
The pps essentially thought “yes it has many calories, but I am in an experiment and I have been told to eat it, so might as well continue to eat it”
Restrained eaters were experiencing motivation collapse (might as well go on and eat many sandwiches) measured about of sandwiches eaten
Herman and Polivy’s (1984) Boundary Model of Eating Regulation
Restrained:
Diet= Third boundary
No preload you eat until you reach the diet boundary and stop as that point
However, in experiment where you are given milkshake preload; you surpass the dietary boundary
And now eat up to your satiety boundary
Over time, restrained eaters learn this behavior and begin to tolerant the large about of meals
As a result of tolerance building up, over time, satiety boundary shifts to the right, as does hunger boundary
Hunger boundary is also smaller than unrestrained (shifts) because they are used to restricting food
There zone of biological indifference is now larger than unrestrained eaters
Thus, when confronted with preload…
Consume larger about of food than unrestrained eaters
Other disinhibitors that don’t require a preload
- > Thoughts
- > Smell
Forms of disinhibition
Heatherton, Herman & Polivy (1991)
Found that anxiety and stress (induced by asking PPS to prepare speeches) greatly increased energy intake in restrained eaters
Dieting and dietary restraint
All dieters are restrained eaters, but not all restrained eaters are dieters
Dieting = attempt to restrict intake in order to lose weight
Dietary restraint = any attempt to limit intake
E.g. you may just be restraining food in order to maintain current weight
Dietary restraint can be bad for your health
Delayed sexual maturation
Osteoporosis
Mood swings
Depression
Green et al., (1994)
Restrained eating and cognitive impairments
Dieters and High R eaters= performing worse, higher reaction times
Impairment and the ‘deprivation hypothesis’
Jones & Rogers (2003)
Mars Bar
After eating
Huge reduction in performance for dieters
Thus, no linked to spiked glucose levels
hey found after eating, dieters had greatly elevated thoughts about food
The idea is that: dieters are thinking about food after food; higher cognitive load
It is cognitively effortful to think about food, causing you to have to now multi-task
Issues with the measures of Dietary restraint
These questionnaires don’t use overlapping constructs, thus it is difficult to compare
Some subscales overlap while others don’t which makes comparison difficult/ complex
TFEQ
Cognitive restraint of eating
Disinhibition
Hunger
DEBQ
Restrained eating
Emotional eating
External eating