Lecture 8 Flashcards
1
Q
What is Cognitive Dissonance?
A
- A feeling of discomfort caused by two or more inconsistent cognitive elements
2
Q
How can you reduce (mitigate) cognitive dissonance?
A
- Add new congruent beliefs to counteract discrepancy
(have other beliefs about smoking) - Direct discrepancy to an external source
(addiction) - Change behaviour to be consistent w/ beliefs
- Change attitudes to be consistent w/ behaviour
3
Q
Whatβre some examples of changing attitude to be consistent with behaviour?
A
- Post-decision dissonance (likes the phone they chose better than another phone they really liked but didnβt get)
- Effort Justification (had to wait ages for food, food is average but overcompensate to make ourselves like it more)
(discussion group - can either join immediately, mild initiation, severe initiation) Severe initiation people found discussion way more interesting - Insufficient reward (larger rewards decrease the likelihood of believing the lie, as they attribute it to the external source $20)
- Insufficient punishment (not given enough reason to not do it) (forbidden toy paradigm - children were either offered a mild or severe threat of punishment if they played with the toy) severe threat = more likely to play with toy
4
Q
What is the self-perception theory?
A
- Triple cheeseburger, does he like wendyβs or maccas? He probably likes maccas because he went there
- Drawing inferences from our own behaviour
- No motivational / arousal component
5
Q
What is the overjustification effect?
A
- Peopleβs intrinsic attitude is undermined by being offered rewards
- Children like colouring, are then offered rewards, rewards are removed and they like it less
- Basketball lost magical qualities after working for money
6
Q
Attitudes have a range of acceptance. Attitudes _____ the range of acceptance cause _____.
A
- Outside
- Dissonance
7
Q
How do you know if arousal is present?
A
- Pills study (arousal, no info, relaxed)
8
Q
Is self-perception possible?
A
- People donβt know why they feel the way they do
- No privileged introspective access (donβt actually know more than what an observer would assume)
- Casual schemas are often right
- Trying to introspect can change your judgement for the worse