Lecture 8 Flashcards

1
Q

Distributive and Integrative negotiation

A

Distributive (S&O) - competetive and distribution of scarce resources. (Win-Lose)

Integrative (Q&A) - seeking mutually beneficial solutions by addressing the underlying interests of both sides (Win-Win)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Distributive negotiation strategies

A
  1. Take it or leave it - Will be typically rejected by individuals from Europe,
    US and East Asia (even when the offer exceeds their BATNA)
  2. Objective/Fair standards - Make claims about the value of the negotiated object based on objective or fair standards
  3. First offers and bargaining - Anchoring effect of the first offer

Often used by Chinese and Qatari

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

BATNA meaning

A

best alternative to a negotiated agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Integrative negotiation strategies

A
  1. Explicit information sharing - info directly stated or communicated (Used by US)
  2. Implicit information sharing - info implied or suggested, but not directly stated (Used by Japan)
  3. Heuristic trial and error - Western negotiators first start by asking questions
    and answers about interests and priorities and in the second half put that information together in multi-issue offers

Integrative strategies often used by US

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Trust connection to distributive vs integrative negotiation strategies

A

When there is trust > Integrative
When there is lack of trust > Distributive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Tight and Loose culture

A

Tight culture - have many strong norms and a low tolerance of deviant behavior (RULE Makers)
Loose culture - Rule breakers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Tightness-Looseness connection to Distributive-Integrative negotiation strategies

A

Tight culture > Distributive
Loose culture > Integrative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Connection between cognitive style and negotiation style

A

Holistic > Distributive (High-context)
Analytic > Integrative (Low-context)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

HIGH trust , TIGHT culture +
LOW trust, TIGHT culture =

A

No issue, both take distributive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

HIGH trust, LOOSE culture +
LOW trust, LOOSE culture =

A

low trust negotiator should seek to adopt an integrative strategy to mach high trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

LOW trust, TIGHT culture +
LOW trust, LOOSE culture =

A

loose culture negotiator should seek to adopt a distributive strategy to mach tight cult.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

HIGH trust, TIGHT culture +
HIGH trust, LOOSE culture =

A

very difficult to find common ground

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

HIGH trust, TIGHT culture +
LOW trust, LOOSE culture =

A

adopt distributive strategy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

HIGH trust, LOOSE culture +
LOW trust, TIGHT culture =

A

very difficult to find common ground

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Influence of Individualism/Collectivism on negotiation

A

Individualistic:
-Higher personal goals in negotiation
-More likely to reject acceptable but suboptimal offers even from the same culture

Collectivist:
-for in-groups engages in cooperative behavior
-for out-groups will not engage in cooperative behavior per se but will cooperate if the out-group is cooperative.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Egalitarism meaning

A

Equality and lack of hierarchy

17
Q

Influence of Egalitarism/Hierarchy on negotiation

A

If negotiations occur in hierarchical cultures, individuals seek to understand each other’s status. In egalitarian cultures, the negotiation is about priorities and interests