Lecture 7 - Place ID Flashcards

1
Q

Who is the founding father of Place ID?

A

Proshanksky et al (1983)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Outline Proshanksky et al (1983)

A
  • Argued that the self is not only distinguished from the others
  • But the self is also distinguished from objects and the env (inanimate objects are different to us)
  • We constantly interact with enviroonment throughout life – its always present
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define PLace ID

A

Cognitions about the physical world in which the individual lives

  • Memories, feelings, values, beliefs, ideals, preference, meanings
  • Physical world includes location, structures, objects, layouts of rooms – e.g. restricted areas like the front of a lecture hall
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the fucntions of Place ID?

A

Recognition
- Recognising and remembering places – how to act in that place

Meaning
- Knowing meaning of locaation – indicating what behaviour woul dbe acceptable

Expressive requirements
- How to act appropriately – e.g. have more expressive capability or less

Mediating change

  • How to make place more comfortable for self/ others
  • Noticing when change is required

Anxiety and defence
- Recognising hostility, problems, need for defensive action – e.g. when to leave

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who did the study in surrey docks?

A

Twigger-Ross & Uzzell (1996)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Outline Twigger-Ross & Uzzell (1996)

A

Interviewed people in Surrey Docks
“All aspects of identity will, to a greater or lesser extent, have place-related implications”
Examined palce ID in Rotherhithe and Surrey Docks
- At the time, this area was in early stages of gentrification (renovating to become a middle class area)
- Looked at what happened to peoples Place ID as area changed and new people moved in – how did new people feel?
- Used breakwkells model of place ID

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Who came up with Identity Process theory?

A

Breakwell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Outlie Breakwell’s identity process theory

A

Individuals accommodate, assimilate and evaluate aspects of social worlds as relates to their ID in 4 ways:
1) Distinctiveness – we use Place ID to distinguish ourself
2) Self-Esteem – proud of national ID
3) Continuity – similar to a place I grew up
4) Self-efficacy – degree to which we easily fulfill self in a place
Particularly salient when ID is threatened
Basically argued that as things happen to us, we adapt to them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Outline Distinciveness as part of Breakwell’s identity process theory

A
  • Much of ID is focused on differentiation (group membership)
  • We try to distinguish ourselves from others
  • Where are you from? – answer to either distinguish or be similar
  • Place ID particularly salient way to distinguish self from others
    • England vs scotland
  • Those in surrey docks distinguished themselves from other london areas
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Outline Self-esteem as part of Breakwell’s identity process theory

A
  • Affects how we feel about ourselves
  • Satisfaction with current environment
  • Pride in national ID
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Outline continuity as part of Breakwell’s identity process theory

A
  • Helps to explain life narrative, sense of similarity/ stability

1) place referent continuity
- A single, specific place with emotional or ID related significant
- E.g. where you grow up

2) Place congruent continuity
- Characteristics of a place that are significant, but transferable - characteristics of the one special place that can be transferred to other locations – e.g. living by the sea again

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Outline self-efficacy as part of Breakwell’s identity process theory

A
  • Different places enable our behaviours differently
  • Highy salient for people with disabilities – places with ramps
  • True for everyone to some degree
  • degree to which we easily fulfill self in a place
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Outline Twigger-Ross & Uzzell’s findings

A

Distinguished between ‘attached’ and ‘non-attached’ residents (via scale) compared qualitive responses
Attached:
- Disnguished self rom other nearby areas (disntincitvnesss)
- Place continuity either sought, or maintained by staying in docklands
Not-attached:
- Noted difficulty in achieving place-congruent or place-referent continuity
- Noted things inhibiting self-efficacy (noise, dirtiness)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the 2 norms in place ID narratives?

A

1) Norm of home:
- Home involves a cultural assumption of stability, family, belonging – have 1 home that’s the place you belong
- In western world, child leaves home at certain age
- People expected to develop their own home

2) Norm of born and bred:
- A narrative resource/ assumption
- Assumes that your place of birth and upbring is:
- The same place
- Has significance to your family/ ancestory
- Where you ‘truly’ belong
- Excludes those who have moved around
- Creates distinction between authentic, long time residents vs newcomers/ outsiders
- E.g.: Immigrants done have access to born and bred argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Who interviewed women to do with the norm of home? and what did she find

A

Taylor (2005)

  • Interviewed women – expected to move out and marry and create new home
  • people struggle to define home – didn’t have just 1 – didn’t have b+b resource, and if they did, they couldn’t expand on it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Who came up with Banal nationalism

A

Billig

17
Q

Outline Billig’s banal nationalism

A

National ID constantly bombards us
- so frequent it becomes banal (invisble) and we cease to notice it

‘Flagging the nation daily’

  • Language use – english, why?
  • Flags in public/ private areas
  • National symbols on products, buildings

Yet we mostly only notice non-daily nationalism – much more obvious

  • Anthems at games
  • Political events
18
Q

What is the question about migration and national ID?

A

But when does ones National ID become revoked, when would you change from canadian to english? How many generatinos

19
Q

Define diaspora

A

Multi-generation population formed through migration
- retains indenfication with homeland
- Mixture of culture and biology
- E.g. diaspora due to ancestor migration
Place ID that transcends borders
Multiple & Hybrid IDs - of old and new home – combo of where im from and where I am
Born + bred is still powerful

20
Q

What national ID has created controversy?

A

St. Patricks day - the desire for inclusivity dilutes how much it relates to the place ID. Exploited by companies and politicians. Very commercialised

21
Q

Which event led to birmingham banning st patricks day/

A

Birmingham Pub bombings (1974)

22
Q

Who interviewed irish residents in birmingham about st.Patricks?

A

Scully (2012)

23
Q

Outline Scully (2012)

A
  • interviewed irish and irish descendents in Birmingham
  • Mixed views about st paddys
  • Some liked how they had spread a great message across the world about irishness
24
Q

What other day was controversial this yea?

A

Canada day - many thought you should be celebrating piliging and exploitation.

25
Q

What 2 hashtags were about during canada day?

A
  • # canda150 or #resist150
  • canda150 had beautiful images, happy photos, national landmarks
  • Resist 150 described ongoing misjutice of indigenous people, protested outside parliament
26
Q

What were the 3 rhetorics used during brexit?

A
  • Rhetoric of belonging
  • Rhetoric of control
  • rhetoric of zenophobia
27
Q

Outline the rhetoric of belonging

A

It’s a question of distinctivness
- is britain a part of europe
- Do europeans have a place in UK?
Remain campaigners didn’t use discourse of belonging
- mostly restircted to social media uses
- Politicians focused on economic consequences
Leave campaigners used war time discource (Galpin, 2016)
- used rhetoric of belonging but as we are distinct – see EU as enemy/ separate from us

28
Q

Outline the rhetoric of zenophobia

A

Fostering fear of foreigners
Leave campaign promoted xenophobia
- immigration – who is excluded if we leave
- outsiders changing British culture, society, economy
- Collective hate step 3 – outsider seen as threat
Facts prove that:
- Immigrants to Uk from eu are likely to be more educated, workni and not claiming benefits, younger than average UK person
- Immigration doesn’t effect economy in local area
- Pay more in tax then benefits they use
Xenophobia based crimes have increased since brexit (Myslinka, 2016)

29
Q

Outline the rhetoric of control

A

Its not about the control itself: tis about who controls
Control over immigration
Control over policy decisions
People who scored highly on authoritarianism far more likely to vote for brexit (Kaufmann, 2016)
- Authoritarianism includes preference to order and consistency
- Dislike diversity/ uncertainty
- Prefer ordered environment with ordered consequcnes
Want control of the palce
Leavers argued: we need to take back control of borders
Remainers argued: we will lose control if we leave - not as simple to understand though, the negative framing lost authoritarian votes – should be: “you will gain control”