*****Lecture 3 - Self Knowledge Flashcards

1
Q

Define introspection

A

The activity of holding your own beliefs, memories, thoughts and feelings in concsious attention - examing the self as an object. Not introversion or rumination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define the introspection illusion

A

Belief that we have accurate understanding of our own thoughts, motivations, beliefs, feelings etc - think our reflective thoughts are true and accurate/ objective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the causes of the introspective illusion?

A
  • F.A.E - underestimate influence of the situation
  • Implicit/ unconcious processes - unware of certain processes - habits/ impulses
  • Confabulation - filling in gaps in our concious awareness, making disconnected thoughts consistent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Where does self-knolwedge come from? 2 things

A

1) Instrumental self-analysis - Ability to complete tasks, objective pass/fail, learn about self
2) Social self-analysis - Attributes defined only by virtue of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

In terms of the introspective illusion, who explored a poor awarness of learning?

A

Carpenter et al (2013)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Outline Carpenter et al (2013)

A
  • p’s either had a fluent lecturer or an unfluent lecutre
  • if they had a fluent lecturer, they predicted that they had learnt more.
  • both groups actually learned the same
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Outline the Dunning-Kruger effect (1999)

A
  • P’s dont know what they dont know
  • Bottom 25% overestimated performance, top undereestimated performance
  • unaware of abilities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which two people explored the poor awareness of priming?

A

Jiang et al (2009)

Spears et al (2004)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Outline Spears er al (2004)

A
  • told students they’re neat, they then did a colouring book neatly, thinking they were neat
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Outline Jiang et al (2009)

A
  • P’s told more lucky numbers, then gambled riskier

- P’s didnt know they had been primed, despite it changing their behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Who argued that poor awarness of cognitive primingdoesnt exist?

A

Doyen et al (2012)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define panic attacks

A
  • Sudden, overwhelming, unexpected sense of doom - activates fight or flight
  • feelings of about to die, very distressing/ tiring, often without logical external trigger, temporary
  • physical symptoms of anxiety lead to more anxious thoughts which repeats the cycle
  • CBT teaches how to interupt this stage
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Outline problems with predicting future behaviour

A
  • We underestimate situational factors
  • DOnt believe data on past behaviour
  • Over influenced by image of possible future self
  • Optimis bias concering personal future behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who explored the problems with predicting future behaviour?

A

Epley + Dunning (2000) - ‘Holier than thou’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

OUtline Epley + Dunning (2000) - ‘Holier than thou’

A
  • Daffodils
  • Asked students if they would buy one, and how many, also how many would others buy?
  • 86% said they would, average of 2
  • predicted 56% others would, 1.6 average
  • only 43% bought, average 1.2
  • predictinos of others were more accurate than of self
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define affective forecasting

A

Predicting ones own future emotional states - how somethings going to make us feel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Define impact bias in terms of affective forcecasting

A
  • Anticipate to never get over bad things

- anticipate that good things make us feel happy for ages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Define focalism

A
  • Overestimating impact of an event - how much it will influence our thoughts/ feelings
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Who did a study into focalism?

A

Gilbert et al (1998)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Outline Gilbert et al (1998)

A
  • Sports fan estimate that wining a match leads to days of happiness, its usually just 1
21
Q

Outline problems with explaining past behaviour

A
  • We think we know reasons for behaviour, but frequently wrong
22
Q

Who did a study into problems with explaining past behaviour

A

Nisbett + Wilson (1977)

23
Q

OUtline Nisbett and wilson (1977)

A

Asked p’s to evaluate clothes in shopping mall and expain their choices - p’s said fashion, celeb etc
- Actually just picked up clothes on the right hand side

24
Q

Who did a study in falsely interpreting internal states/

A

Zillman et al (1974)

25
OUtline Zillman et al (1974)
- p's rode bike to increase heart rate and blood pressure - P's overestimated how quickly their body actually calmed down - Then asked to respond to aggressive behaviour - if p's were aroused + aware: low aggression - If p's were unaroused: low aggressions - if p's were aroused + unaware: high aggression - linked to schacter and singer
26
What does research argue the self develops towards?
- Stability and consistency
27
Who came up with the criticism of introspection?
Wilson + Dunn (2004)
28
What are Wilson + Dunn (2004) criticisms of introspection as a research method
X - no access to non-concious mental process X - Focuses attention on unrepresentative data about self X - leads to incomplete/ incorrect normatives of behviour X - Promotes rumination - can lead to mental distress and depression
29
Define Self-esteem
- Evaluation of self, to the point in which we assign/ believe in our self worth - extent to which we approve of ourselves/ believe ourselves capable, significant, successful worthy
30
Who came up with a SE scale?
Rosenberg SE scale
31
Outline the types of SE
- explicit SE - concious evaluation, how good we are at something, could be public - Implicit SE - automatic, unconcious - Non- contingent SE - success at tasks, feedback from others. Need self-compassion to avoid overwhelming negative emotions
32
What are the influences on SE, and define them?
- Reflected appraisal (parents, bullying, ostracism) - Social comparison (upwards or downwards), to others, or to ideal self -
33
Who did a study into how not all negative events reduce SE?
Crocker et al (2002)
34
OUtline Crocker et al (2002)
- Had p's waiting to hear if they got into grad school - had to rate happiness if accepted/ rejected - Those who didnt base self-concept on academics didnt care - Those who did had large fluctuations
35
Who did the study into gendre congruent subjects?
Crocker et al (2003)
36
Crocker et al (2003)
- For those in gender congruent subjects (male - engineering, female - psychology), higher grades led to higher SE - In gender incongruent subjects, higher grades had little effect
37
Define Self-enhancement
- People naturally resist decreases in SE - capitalise on opportunities to increase it
38
Who did a study into Self-enhancement?
Zell + Alicke (2009)
39
Outline Zell + Alicke (2009)
- p's were either told they were above average, average or below - Students also told their grades were improving or decreasing - improvements -> Increased self-ratings - Decreasing -> no effects
40
According to Jessers Maintanence model (2003), when someone close to us outperforms us, what do we do?
- Pretend the tak is outside our interests | - See task as relevant - damages SE
41
Who came up with the genuis effect?
Alicke et al (1997)
42
Outline Alicke et al (1997)
- When beaten, we try to invalidate the test - its unfair - when we win, we try to validate the test - to maintain a positive self- concept
43
Define self-handicapping
- We self-sabotage to boost SE - Avoiding behaviour that may increase chance of success - Self-destructive behaviour to inhibit success - Plausible excuse for anticipated failure
44
Who explored self-sabotage?
Niiya et al (2010)
45
Outline Niiya et al (2010)
Gave groups chance to study with/ without distraction - Group 1 believed in practice improving performance, self worth based on acadamic performance - Group 2: Blieved in trait fixedness - Group 1 self-handicapped
46
Who did the study into Facebook and SE?
Mehdizadeh (2010)
47
OUtline Mehdizadeh (2010)
Those with Low rosenberg SE scales - spent more time tying to boost self image on fb - updatade profile pic more, drew attention to it, didt lie
48
Who did a study into the spotlight effect?
Glovich, 2002
49
Outline Glovich, 2002
- p's had to enter room either in embarassing shirt, or short they're proud to wear - in embarassing condition, overestimated how much people looked at them