Lecture 4 (final) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

why is it difficult for psychologists to be objective

A

Doing science is part of human behaviour. When psychologists do science, they engage often behaviours that they are studying. Psychologists are part of their own subject matter, and therefore it is difficult to be objective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what does it mean by All science is a social enterprise

A

There are conventions, traditions, shared assumptions, and such things as peer review, which ensures that too controversial positions are moderated and even filtered out (see Kuhn’s idea of a paradigm; “Science progresses funeral by funeral”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

is there a “pure” science and a “subjective” science?

A

Science is a mixture of both, with the hope that all parties engaged in to their best to further progress towards the truth, or whatever aspect of truth humans are fit to comprehend.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are the 2 basic assumptions underlying experimental approach in psychology

A

Researchers only influence the participant’s behaviour to the extent that they decide what hypothesis to test, how the variables are to be operationalised, what design to use, etc
The only factors influencing the participant’s behaviour are the objectively defined variables manipulated by the experimenter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what experimental problems undermine the 2 beliefs

A

experimenter bias, demand characteristics, representativeness, artificiality, and internal vs external validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is experimenter bias

A

????

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what was significant about the mice experiment and the observations of their pain

A

Exposure of mice and rats to male but not female experimenters produces pain inhibition
this happened because when the mice could smell testosterone (of an alfa male) they attempted to conceal their pain in order to look stronger
so this was a factor that they did not even know existed until the experiment happened

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are demand characteristics

A

The person being studied is not only a passive responder, but might engage in the experiment actively, e.g., trying to solve the problem what the experiment is actually about

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how might demand characteristics cause a problem in the experiment

A

This can lead participants to respond in a way to confirm the assumed hypothesis, in order to please the experimenter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The sum total of cues of the experimental situation that convey the experimental hypothesis to participants are called _________

A

The sum total of cues of the experimental situation that convey the experimental hypothesis to participants are called the demand characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how is representativeness important in experiments

A

The data obtained do not represent humanity in general

It is doubtful, whether obtained effects can be found in other populations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

give an example of representativeness

A

Psychological research is done predominantly on white North-American undergraduate students enrolled in psychology courses at colleges and universities
The bias is Anglocentric, Eurocentric, Androcentric, and, used to be Masculinist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How is artificiality a problem in experiments

A

Psychological research usually unfolds inside research laboratories located at research institutes and university departments
Participants are subjected to often bizarre tasks, which they are asked to perform in the name of science
Often these tasks are the result of a reductionist approach, aimed at identifying mechanisms of cognition/behaviour
It is unclear, however, to what extent the observed behaviour reflects the normal operation of the brain in natural situations and under natural conditions. Animal research (in psychology) faces the same problem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is a solution to artificiality

A

One solution are field studies in which the experimenter tries to observe natural behaviour in the wild without being noticed by the observed population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is FIELD STUDY/NATURALISTIC OBSERVATION

A

Observe natural behaviour without attempt to control or manipulate it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

why is FIELD STUDY/NATURALISTIC OBSERVATION difficult

A

There is no control over the behaviour of subjects, and therefore it is difficult to determine the cause of the behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

despite its difficulties, how might researchers used field study/naturalistic observation to conduct an experiment

A

Some research strategies involve first field research to describe and identify behaviours, which then can be followed up in other forms of experimental approaches with increased control over behaviour
Participants are observed in an arranged situation.
Experimenter interacts directly or indirectly with participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what extent do factors influence the behaviour of the participants and to what extent this is moderated by indirect or direct interaction with experimenter when it comes to field study/naturalistic observation

A

Unclear to what extent situational factors influence the behaviour of the participants and to what extent this is moderated by indirect or direct interaction with experimenter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what are the things to consider when doing observational studies

A

coding, reactivity, observer bias, experimenter expectancy effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what is coding

A

Observational techniques involve the systematic assessment and coding of overt behaviour. Coding involves generating of behavioural categories and noting when and how often behaviour of a certain category was observed. The coded behaviour can then be used to compute indices to quantify behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what is reactivity

A

Observational studies need to consider whether observer shall be visible or not. The presence of the observer can influence behaviour. This alteration is called reactivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what is observer bias

A

Systematic errors in observation that can arise from the observer’s expectations. For example, in many societies women are freer to express sadness than men. Observers coding for facial expression of sadness may tend to rather interpret ambiguous facial expressions as sad in females than in males

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

what is experimenter expectancy effect

A

Observer expectations can change the behaviour of the observed being. One method to prevent this effect is to blind the experimenter to the experimental conditions and/or hypotheses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

what is an example of experimenter expectancy effect

A

students were told to train rats to go through a maze, one group was told that their rat was bred from stupid rats and the other group was told that their rat was bred from smart rats… the result was that the stupid rat group didn’t even attempt to train their rat well because they had low expectations for their rat…. in reality neither group had anything “special” about their rat (they did not come from a line or smart or stupid rats)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

what are case studies

A

Report of a single individual, group, situation.

Collection of highly detailed descriptions that other research settings not readily offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

what are the downfalls of case studies

A

Causal relationships often hard to establish, and results may be hard to generalise to others (because case studies happen so rarely)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

what are the potentials of case studies

A

Can provide strong motivation for future research efforts to test hypothesis derived from case study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

do the same case studies happen often

A

nope! or it wouldn’t be a case study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

what is an example of a famous case study

A

Henry Molaison (Patient HM)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

what was the Performance Profile for Case HM

A
Impaired:
episodic memory 
recognition memory for recent objects/places
explicit memory task 
Semantic memory :
priming
procedural memories
conditioning
implicit memory tasks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

why was case HM a Highly influential case study

A

This case study marks the beginning of a research field studying the role of hippocampus in memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

what are the different approaches to research

A

OBSERVATIONAL STUDY: FIELD STUDY/NATURALISTIC OBSERVATION
Case Studies
SELF REPORTS AND (STRUCTURED) INTERVIEWS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

what are SELF REPORTS AND (STRUCTURED) INTERVIEWS

A

Participants are directly asked about aspects of their existences, such as living conditions, thoughts, feelings, actions etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

how are self-reports and (structures) interviews conducted

A

These questions can be little and highly structured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

what are highly structured questions

A

highly structured questions are given in a determined sequence with determined answer options

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

what are less structured questions

A

Less structured questions allow participant to respond in free form

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

what for do self-reports and (structures) interviews take

A

These research efforts use interviews, surveys, questionnaires

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

what is a problem that comes from self-reports and (structures) interviews

A

Interviews need to deal with biases of many kinds. In general, participants have the wish to appear good or in a light that they deem positive. Questionnaire designers have to consider to what extent the questions produce socially desirable responding, or faking good

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

how do researchers attempt to avoid the problem with self-reports and (structures) interviews

A

Often, interviews ask for the same information repeatedly in different forms to try to capture (more or less successfully) response biases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

what are Correlational studies

A

Correlational studies explore how variables are naturally related, describing and predicting relationships between the variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

what can’t Correlational studies detect

A

Correlational studies cannot detect causal relationships between the variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

give an example of how Correlational studies cannot detect causal relationships between the variables

A

Example: most colleges require SAT scores in their student applications because it has been found that SAT scores and academic performance positively correlate – the higher the SAT score, the better academic performance

Scoring high on the test does not cause better academic performance. High academic performance also does not cause higher test scores. These variables are correlated, but not related in a causal way (A causes B)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

what do Correlational studies allow for

A

Correlational studies allow making predictions, and these predictions can be tested in controlled experiments to search for causal relationships between identified variables and observational outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

what are the directions of correlation

A

Positive correlation
Negative correlation
Zero correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

what is Positive correlation:

A

both variables move in the same direction (the more X, the more Y; the less X the less Y)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

what is Negative correlation:

A

the variables move in opposite directions (the more X, the less Y; the less X the more Y)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

what is Zero correlation: the

A

variables are not predictably related

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

what are some challenges of correlational studies

A

Directionality problem

Third variable problem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

what is Directionality problem

A

the direction of the relationship between variables can appear ambiguous. Causations cannot be determined, so it remains unclear whether a positive or negative correlation results from the increase in one or the other measured variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

what is an example of Directionality problem

A

For example, if you sleep less, your stress levels increase. But it is possible that increased stress levels make you sleep less

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

what is Third variable problem

A

this is a basic problem of all correlational studies. The relationship between the two measured correlated variables might be dependent on a third, not measured, variable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

give an example of Third variable problem

A

Example, texting while driving (A) is correlated with driving dangerously (B):

Risk taking (C) causes some people to text while driving: C→A …AND;

Risk taking (C) causes some people to drive dangerously: C→B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

what is experimental method

A

An experiment is a research method that tests causal hypothesis by manipulating and measuring variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

what are The manipulated variables called

A

independent variables (IV)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

what are the variables to measure the effect of the manipulations called

A

dependent variables (DV)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

what are the components to the experimental method

A
Independent variable (IV)
Dependent variable (DV).
Experimental group(s)
Control group(s)
57
Q

what is Experimental group(s)

A

Participants who receive a treatment.

58
Q

what are control groups

A

Participants who receive no treatment or who receive a treatment that is unrelated to the independent variable being investigated

59
Q

what are the different levels to the independent variable

A

independent variables have at least two levels: a) treatment level; b) comparison level.

60
Q

explain how test the hypothesis that cell phone use affects driving performance (give all the components and explain them)

A

Independent variable (IV). In order to test the hypothesis that cell phone use affects driving performance, the independent variable would be the type of cell phone use

Levels: independent variables have at least two levels: a) treatment level; b) comparison level. In case of the cell phone use study, the independent variable could have four levels: (texting) vs (calling) vs (only holding) vs (no use)

Dependent variable (DV). The measured/observed behaviour. For example, in the cell phone study the DV could be reaction time to red lights

Experimental group(s). Participants who receive a treatment. For example, in the cell phone study you will have participants in the two experimental groups “Texting” and “Calling”

Control group(s). Participants who receive no treatment or who receive a treatment that is unrelated to the independent variable being investigated. For example, in the cell phone study the control group would not use the cell phone. The study could also have a control condition in which participants are asked to talk to listen to the radio or to talk to a passenger in the car 
This allows to study causal relationships between the IV (e.g., type of cell phone use) and the DV (reaction time to red lights). If the IV consistently influences the DV, then the IV is assumed to cause changes in the DV, all other things being equal
61
Q

in order to allow causal inferences, experiments depend on what

A

rigorous control

62
Q

what are all the parts to establishing causality

A
control
confound
Population sampling
Random sampling
Convenience sampling
Random assignment
63
Q

what is control

A

All steps taken by the experimenter to minimise the possibility that other variables besides the IVs influence the DV

64
Q

what is confound

A

Anything that affects a DV and that varies unintentionally between the IV levels. For example, in the cell phone study a type of car could be used that most participants have little experience operating (e.g., in the US instead of automatic transmission, a car with manual transmission is used). This could affect performance and aggravate or generate effects of cell phone use on driving performance. Thus, the reaction time to red lights could be confounded with the driver’s competence to operate the car. Other confounds could be time of day the experiment is conducted, etc.

65
Q

what is population sampling

A

The selection of the participants (i.e., the sample from the population) for a behavioural study is critical to determine the domain of applicability of the results

66
Q

define population

A

Population refers to everyone in the group in which the experimenter is interested (e.g., college students; retired bartenders).

67
Q

define a sample

A

A sample is a group of people chosen from the population

68
Q

what is a representative sample

A

The sampling process should lead to a true representation of the population

69
Q

what is random sampling

A

The best way to ensure that the sample is representative is to randomly select a sufficient number of participants from the population. Larger samples lead to more accurate results of the experiment. However, large samples can be too costly in light of available resources

70
Q

what is sample size estimation

A

Using a mathematical technique called a priori power analysis, it can be estimated how many participants need to be sampled in order to be able to detect meaningful effects with the experiment

71
Q

what is convenience sampling

A

Most psychological research at academic institutions samples from the most conveniently available population, usually undergraduate psychology students

72
Q

what is random assignment

A

Participants in the sample are randomly assigned to the experimental conditions (i.e., the levels of the IV). Each participant in the sample has the same chance being assigned to any treatment level.

There are individual differences between the participants. Random assignment ensures that on average these differences are comparable between experimental groups

73
Q

what is a problem with random assignment

A

Selection bias

74
Q

what is Selection bias

A

The assignment might not be truly random (e.g., participants differ in unexpected ways). For example, in the cell phone study it could by accident happen that many participants assigned to the “texting” group have a lot of experience with texting. Researchers try to anticipate these possible factors and use them to control their effect by pseudo-randomisation

75
Q

what is Pseudo-randomisation

A

Participants are randomly chosen from the sample to be assigned to an experimental group. If their assignment would lead to more people with a confounding factor (e.g., experience texting) being assigned to an experimental group, another participant will be selected for assignment, until all participants from the sample have been assigned

76
Q

what is the design principle of between subjects design

A

a separate group of participants (ideally equally in size) is assigned to each of the different conditions by random or pseudo-random selection, in order to promote groups that are equal in respect to characteristics influencing the DV

77
Q

how are the participants in between subjects design separated

A

by random or pseudo-random selection

78
Q

what are the Advantages of between subjects designs

A

each participant only subjects to one treatment condition only. The obtained DV measure is therefore less influenced by (a) practice/experience effects; (b) fatigue/ boredom of participants; (c) sequence effects. This design is versatile and can be used for many research questions

79
Q

what are the Disadvantages of between subjects designs

A

(a) relatively large number of participants needed (large N; N stands for number of subjects); (b) measurements obtained from different participants, inducing variance due to different characteristics

80
Q

what is the design principle of WITHIN SUBJECTS DESIGN

A

all participants exposed to all treatment conditions. Therefore, the experimental groups are equivalent, which increases the study’s internal validity

81
Q

what is another name for WITHIN SUBJECTS DESIGN

A

OR REPEATED MEASURES DESIGN

82
Q

what are the Advantages of within subjects designs

A

(a) fewer participants are needed than in a corresponding between-subjects design; (b) reduced measurement errors because individual differences between treatment groups are eliminated

83
Q

what are the Disadvantages of within subjects designs

A

repeatedly measuring may promote (a) progressive error, because performance changes between treatment conditions are in addition to treatment influenced by the experience of participating in an experiment (e.g., fatigue, practice effects); (b) carryover effects, treatment in a particular condition might change participants such that it affects performance in a later condition

84
Q

what are the 5 types of validity

A
External validity
Internal validity
Construct validity
Face validity
Criterion validity
85
Q

what is External validity:

A

the degree to which a result obtained in an experiment can be generalised to other (everyday) situations

86
Q

where can the results from external validity be found

A

An experiment with high external or ecological validity produced results that can also be found in real nature

87
Q

what is internal validity

A

refers to the quality of an experiment, precisely, whether in an experiment the observed effects measured with the DV are due to the independent variables (IVs) and not to confounds

88
Q

what happens if there is a lot of control over the IVs

A

The greater the control over the IVs, the more artificial the experimental situation, and the lower the external validity

89
Q

give an example of an experiment lacking internal validity

A

Hypothesis: Special Tutoring will improve test performance on final.
Bad research strategy: draw one sample and assign all participants in it to the same treatment condition

90
Q

give an example with good internal validity

A

Hypothesis: Special Tutoring will improve test performance on final
get one group
split them into 2 groups
give one group the hypothesis treatment, and leave the other alone
compare the end results

91
Q

what is contract validity

A

does the test relate to the theoretical concepts from which the test was derived? E.g., to what extent does an IQ test measure intelligence as defined in a theory of intelligence? Construct validity requires that it is established that the phenomenon to be measured indeed exists (hence dependent on a theory)

92
Q

what is face validity

A

does the test measure what it declares to measure? Eg., does an IQ test actually measure intelligence?

93
Q

what is Criterion validity:

A

what is the relationship between the test and other correlated measures (the criteria)? E.g., how well does the outcome of an IQ test correlate with GPA/academic performance/SAT/GRE etc?

94
Q

what are some other possible error sources arising from measurement

A

random error

systematic error

95
Q

what is random error

A

Your method of measurement produces a random artifact in the data. For example, if you stop participant reaction time by hand with a stopwatch, you will not always be equally accurate. The degree or error varies randomly each time a measurement is taken

96
Q

what us systematic error

A

Your measurement is inaccurate by a constant amount. For example, the stopwatch you use to measure reaction time is off by 0.25 seconds. Each measurement will be wrong by this constant amount

97
Q

is metatheoretical structuralist a section of Wundt’s Structuralism

A

no, absolutely not

98
Q

what is the metatheoretical structuralist view

A

theories consist of typically several theory elements. These elements are structures

In addition, theories need a description of the paradigmatic method. This defines the range of intended applications of a theory

99
Q

according to the metatheoretical structuralist view, what are structures

A

Structures are similar to systems. They consist of atomic parts and their relations. They are characterized by theoretical definitions and set-theoretical predicates

100
Q

what branch does the metatheoretical structuralist view go under

A

EMPIRICAL STRUCTURALISM

101
Q

what is the official definition of metatheoretical structuralist view

A

A theory-element is a set-theoretical structure, consisting of two elements: (1) a theory core; (2) a set of intended applications of the theory core. Structuralist theories usually consist of several theory-elements

102
Q

according to the official definition of the metatheoretical structuralist view, is structuralism universally applicable

A

According to this definition, in structuralism a theory is not universally applicable. It is only applicable to the range or domain of intended and/or explicitly stated applications: THE IDEA OF EXTERNAL VALIDITY IS IRRELEVANT FOR THE GOODNESS OF A THEORY

103
Q

how does THE IDEA OF EXTERNAL VALIDITY play into the metatheoretical structuralist view

A

THE IDEA OF EXTERNAL VALIDITY IS IRRELEVANT FOR THE GOODNESS OF A THEORY

104
Q

who started Logical empiricism

A

Bacon and Descartes

105
Q

what is Logical empiricism

A

Logical empiricism (starting with Bacon and Descartes) assumed that science can rest on a secure base of pure, objective empirical observations that are independent of the observer and of theory: what is can actually be discovered by human observation

106
Q

is the Logical empiricism approach tenable

A

no

107
Q

what is distribution (in a graph)

A

the spread of the data points across the range of possible measurements

108
Q

In order to summarize and understand the data (complete the analysis), what must first be completed

A

a frequency distribution

109
Q

what are bins (in data)

A

categories, or ranges

110
Q

what are bins used for

A

bins (categories, or ranges) would be defined to group and summarize the data

111
Q

when would the histogram be generated

A

at the end

112
Q

what are the different types of data distributions (in graphs)

A

skewed left
skewed right
normal distribution

113
Q

what is a graph called when it is skewed left

A

positively skewed

114
Q

what is a graph called when it is skewed right

A

negatively skewed

115
Q

what is a graph called when it is normally distributed

A

normally distributed

116
Q

what are the different measures of central tendency

A

mode
Median
average (or mean)

117
Q

what is mode

A

the value that occurs most often in a dataset. In a frequency distribution, this is the category with the highest frequency

118
Q

what is median

A

the data point in a dataset for which 50% of all data points are higher in value, and 50% of all data are lower in value.

119
Q

what is average (or mean)

A

the average value of a set of data, computed by adding all values and dividing their sum by the number of data points that were added up

120
Q

what are the central tendency measures for normal distributions

A

In a perfectly normally distributed dataset, mode, median, mean are the same value.
In empirical data sets that satisfy criteria for normal distributions, the values are usually not identical, but very close to each other

121
Q

are the central tendency measurements in skewed distributions the same

A

In a negatively skewed distribution mode, median, and mean are different. For these distributions, it is best to use the median to characterize the central tendency. The mean is too much affected by outliers (extreme values), and does not well represent the distribution

122
Q

where does variability come from

A

Variability results from various sources, such as measurement errors, differences between the subjects participating in the study, etc

123
Q

when is Measures of central tendency only meaningful

A

Measures of central tendency are only meaningful if accompanied by a measure of variability

124
Q

what is Standard deviation

A

Standard deviation: is an index of the amount of variability in a data set. Standard deviation is the average distance of the data points from the mean. A large standard deviation means the data in the distribution are spread wide around the mean, a small one that they are closely scattered around the mean

125
Q

what the hell does this even mean

A

In a normal distribution, about 68% of the values are within ±1 standard deviation from the mean, while 95% fall within +- standard deviations from the mean

126
Q

In an experiment, independent variables are systematically varied…. how is the effect of this manipulation measured

A

the effect of this manipulation is measured with the dependent variable.

127
Q

In an experiment, independent variables are systematically varied, and the effect of this manipulation is measured with the dependent variable.
This leads to data obtained under different treatment conditions. The data points form distributions
The question now is what

A

if these distributions are different, is the difference meaningful, i.e., big enough to attribute it to the treatment, or too small

how do we know if the change is chance or effect

128
Q

what is expected if the data between groups significantly bigger

A

If the group difference in the DV are sufficiently bigger than what we would expect simply by chance, then we believe this difference to be statistically significant

129
Q

what is Null hypothesis (H0)

A

The differences between the groups are due to chance

130
Q

what is Experimental hypothesis (H1).

A

The differences are due to manipulating the IV

131
Q

what is the cut-off post for significance

A

this probability that the difference between the treatment groups is due to chance is assessed with the p-value. This is also called the alpa-error (of type 1 error) — it is the probability to falsely reject the H0 (hypothesis that the results are due to chance) in light of the results

132
Q

what is the p-value also called

A

This is also called the alpa-error (of type 1 error)

133
Q

what is Type II error

A

The probability to falsely reject the H1, i.e., to conclude that the differences in DV are due to chance, while in fact they were caused by the treatment

134
Q

by convention, what is p always set to

A

By convention, p is set to p=0.05

135
Q

what does p=0.05 it mean

A

(i.e., 5% chance to falsely accept the H1, namely that the difference is due to the treatment).

136
Q

SOME CRITICAL ISSUE REGARDING SIGNIFICANCE TESTING (p values)

A

Level of significance
Sample size effects
Effect size

137
Q

explain SOME CRITICAL ISSUE REGARDING SIGNIFICANCE TESTING:

Level of significance.

A

p=0.05 considered often too low a criterion because 5% of all tests performed will produce by chance a significant result. Therefore, p=0.01 is often used or proposed. Lower p-values are assumed to be more conservative.

138
Q

explain SOME CRITICAL ISSUE REGARDING SIGNIFICANCE TESTING: Sample size effects

A

The bigger the sample, the more likely it becomes that even very small differences between the groups become statistically significant

139
Q

explain effect size in relation to explain SOME CRITICAL ISSUE REGARDING SIGNIFICANCE TESTING:

A

The effect size gives a measure of how big the group differences are for statistically significant results (Cohen’s d is a measure of effect size).
For example, with d=0.0, your probability would be 50% (chance) that you could guess, based on a test score alone, whether the score comes from a control or treatment condition.
For example, with d=3.0, your probability to make this guess correctly would be 99.9%