Lecture 4 Flashcards

1
Q

What are biological predispositions?

A

Inborn predispositions to learn were demonstrated with respect to:

  1. the separation in time between the CS and US = critical determinant of conditioning
  2. “equipotentiality” premise - it does not matter what stimuli are used in conditioning (any CS will be equally good in all contexts)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Steps involved in learned taste aversion

A
  1. exposed rats to flavoured water and bright noisy water
  2. exposed rats to x-ray gastrointestinal disturbance and nausea
  3. tested drinking of the 2 waters after X-ray exposure
  4. control experiment with foot shock

Nausea could not be conditioned to light noise, nor could fear could be conditioned to taste
–> one CS will always be a better predictor for a certain US

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain flavour-illness associations

A
  1. conditioned taste avoidance

2. conditioned disgust test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain conditioned taste avoidance

A
  • measured by consumption test

- appetite and consummatory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain conditioned disgust test

A

Measured by taste reactivity test:

  1. flavoured solution = CS (sucrose –> tongue protrusions)
  2. drug = US –> sickness = UR
  3. pairCS with US
  4. present CS and measure CR (sucrose –> gaping)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is preparedness?

A

animal/human seem prepared to associated some CS-US combinations more readily than others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is preparedness defined by?

A

the amount of inputs (# of trials) that are necessary to develop a reliable output (response)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Example of prepared associations

A

taste aversion

- only takes a few trials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Example of unprepared association

A

light and food

  • biology isn’t going with/against you
  • takes a number of conditioning trials
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Example of counter-prepared association

A

Pigs of Breland & Breland

  • “instinctive drift”
  • what you’re trying to get animal to do can’t be done
  • completely unnatural
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Determinants of the CR

A

For responses mediated by the somatic NS, the CR can be very complex

CS+ –> central fear state –> defensive reactions, heart rate change, analgesia, instrumental avoidance behaviour

CS+ –> central appetitive state –> appetitive behaviours, salivation, insulin secretion, instrumental appetitive behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

For responses mediated by the automatic NS, the CR can be:

A
  • identical to the UR (eye blink)

- opposite of the UR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is opposite to the primary effect?

A

Compensatory response

- body’s withdrawal response (in the absence of drugs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Direct conditioning is composed of?

A
  • conditioning of a process

- conditioning of b process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The a process is associated with?

A

drug-like responses

- similar to acute effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The b process is associated with?

A

drug-opposite responses

- similar to withdrawal

17
Q

Dr. Shirley Spragg - Drug-like conditioned responses led to?

A

Conditioned place preference = a process

–> needle freaks (conditioned to injection itself, not even the drug)

18
Q

Dr. Shirley Spragg - Conditioned withdrawal led to?

A

Conditioned place aversion = b process

19
Q

Injections of naltrexone resulted in?

A

Responsible for associating drug from receptor –> precipitates withdrawal

  • huge avoidance of compartment where naltrexone was given
  • conditioned to particular environment
  • smell of naltrexone –> huge disgust response weeks later
20
Q

Why does body loo for environmental predictors of drug?

A
  • to respond faster
  • respond more appropriately

Over time:

  • b process is actually larger and occurs earlier (body trying to mount response to a)
  • a-b = composite of 2 effects happening at the same time
  • no drug effect and a lot of pain –> people use more to feel same effect
21
Q

Is tolerance the result of compensatory CRs and context dependent?

A

Yes

Examples:

  • decreased salvation when drinking decaf coffee
  • increase in alcohol intoxication when drinking green beer (missing yellow cue)
  • decrease in alcohol intoxication when drinking in bar (conditioned response to bar atmosphere)
  • increase in heroin overdose in unfamiliar environment
22
Q

Examples of cue reactivity

A
  1. conditioned cues - bag of heroin, enough cash to buy heroin
  2. automatic arousal - skin temperature, conductance, heat rate, blood pressure
  3. motivational arousal - desire for drugs, changes in mood
  4. behavioural arousal - drug seeking and taking
  5. neural activation - limbic system
23
Q

What is the amygdala involved in?

A

emotional learning

24
Q

Cue-reactivity refers to?

A

responses to drug conditioned stimuli

25
Q

Conditioned compensatory responses:

A

result from the association between a CS and the “b” process

26
Q

Which of the following is true about direct drug conditioning?

A

the “b” process is a form of withdrawal

27
Q

Which of the following does not belong?

- compensatory, unconditioned, homeostatic, learned

A

learned

28
Q

The concept of preparedness refers to the extent to which?

A

the response to be learned is a natural one from an evolutionary perspective

29
Q

In taste reactivity:

  • the taste is the US
  • the drug is the CS
  • sickness is the CR that is measured
  • taste avoidance is the CR
A

None of the above