Lecture 3 Flashcards
What are three criticisms of the original multistore model?
- sensory store, STM and LTM are not unitary
- over-emphasis of structural aspects of memory, rather than processes
- STM is not the gateway to LTM
What was the main deficit of Patient KF?
inability to repeat verbal material - digit/letter/word span of 1
What is evidence for independence of ST & LT memory in neuropsychology?
amnesics - damage to the medial temporal lobe: impaired long-term memory, in-tact short term
patient K.F&others - damage to the parietal & temporal lobes: normal long-term memory, poor short term memory
What did Baddeley and Hitch (1974) do?
replaced the concept of “short-term store” with “working memory” by proposing subcomponents within the STM
What are the four subcomponents of the STM store?
- central executive
- phonological loop
- visuo-spatial sketchpad
- episodic buffer
What does the central executive compose?
modality free, resembles attentions, deals with any demanding task, uses slave systems
What does the phonological loop do?
(inner voice) holds info in a speech-based form
What is the visuo-spatial sketchpad?
(inner eye) specialised for spatial and visual coding and manipulation
What is the episodic buffer?
temporary storage system - holds and integrates info from phonological loop, visuo-spatial sketchpad and LTM
Components of the working memory model system are thought to be…
limited in capacity and relatively indepndent - if two tasks use the same component they cannot be used succesfully together
What did Conrad (1964) find about phonological similarity?
short-term memory uses a phonological code, even for visually presented stimuli
What are two findings of Baddeley’s (1966) about the phonological similarity effect?
- Immediate serial recall of visually presented words is worse with a phonologically similar list, compared to a dissimiar list
- suggests that we use speech-based rehearsal processes within the phonological loop
What does the word length effect show?
Memory span is lower for words taking a long time to say - suggests that capacity of phonological loop is determined by articulatory duration
What does articulatory suppression do?
e.g. counting repeatedly - eliminates phonological similarity effect & word length effect for visually presented stimuli but not for auditorily presented stimuli
Why doesn’t articulatory suppression eliminate the phonological similarity effect & the word length effect for auditorily presented stimuli?
auditory presentation allows direct access to the phonological store - visually presented stimuli are recorded into phonological form by means of subvocalisation