Lecture 2 - IR: A Debating Discipline Flashcards

1
Q

reasons for great debates - academic scene

A

theories are shaped by their immediate social setting = the academic scene

this academic scene is combative where theories are competing with each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

reasons for great debates - historical circumstances

A

different theories are reflective of and were meant to provide explanations to changing historical circumstances (like realism emerging after world war 2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

reasons for great debates - diversity and complexity of what is studied

A

theories are reflective of the diversity and complexity of what is studies (wars / economic interdependence / climate change etc).

this leads to multiple perspectives on what the most important factors are and how inquiry should proceed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

reasons for great debates - identities of scholars

A

theories are relinked to our identities as scholars, our socialization, geographical location, experiences, gender, ethnicity and economic status.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

reasons for great debates - disciplinary mark of distinction

A

emphasis on theory is what distinguishes IR from other disciplines, which IR grew out of (history, law, diplomatic studies)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

reasons for great debates - structuring effects of scientific disciplines

A

where intellectual innovation which conforms to collective standards and priorities is rewarded

where authority is concentrated with those who achieve power over knowledge goals and procedure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Contemporary theoretical debates focus on three questions regarding the nature and purpose of human knowledge and understanding

A
  1. ontological = What is it that is being studied, who is being studied, and more generally, what does the world consist of?
  2. epistemological = How can we understand the world
    and what is the status of the knowledge claims we make about the world?
  3. methodological = What methods should we adopt in our study?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Most intensely fought between:

A

neorealism and social constructivism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

positivist theories - what is being studied

A

The international system and its structuring (constraining or enabling) effects

Material world and material factors (especially the role of military resources)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

post-positivist theories - what is being studied

A

International society and its constituting effects.

Socially constructed world and immaterial factors (e.g, norms, ideas, identities)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

positivist theories - who is being studied?

A

states

= central and rational actors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

post-positivist theories - who is being studied?

A

plurality of actors (states, IO’s, NGO’s , bureaucrats, individuals)

= social actors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

positivist theories (neo-realism) - what does the world consist of?

A

Anarchic world (= absence of world government) based on uneven distribution of power between states

= enduring competition, conflict, war

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

post-positivist theories (social constructivism) - what does the world consist of?

A

world cultures based on shared ideas

= cooperation, contestation; change and process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

positivist theories (neo-realism) - how can we understand the world / what is the status of the knowledge claims we make about the world

A

causal explanations

neutral, objective truth-like and generalizable claims

emulation of social sciences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

post-positivist theories (social constructivism) - how can we understand the world / what is the status of the knowledge claims we make about the world

A

interpretation and understanding

subjective, context-bound (middle-range theorizing) and critical, self-reflective claims

sociology, philosophy, literary and linguistic studies as reference point