Lecture 13 - Drug Taking Behaviour Flashcards

1
Q

Outline what Macnish 1859 states about the anatomy of drunk ness

A

Man creature of habit.
Drinking regularly certain times feels longing liquor states return these periods
Certain companies or particular tavern at which he in habit taking his libations (offering)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Outline cue elicited relapse

A

Exemplified I’m cured tobacco smoker
Cured smoker usually does not crave tobacco may feel intense desire resembling hunger when he gazed at box or sits company smokers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Outline environmental factors in relapse

A

Primary withdrawal
Drug taking environment triggers cravings
Smell elicits craving related to compensatory adaptation changes = indicates safety environments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Outline Siegel, Hanson, Keane and McCully 1982 study on contextual factors in overdose

A

Rodents toxicology. % animals dying after exposure different drugs.
Control group same tested environment 100% death
Same dose relative safe environment previously exposed and familiarised with drug
Context specific
Changing environment not as bad as controls

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Outline Gutierrez-Cebollada et al 1994 study on overdose in novel environments

A

Reporting a&e. Asked if when became unwell if I’m usual of different environment
Normal accidents = normal environments
Heroin overdose = unusual environment
Potent in environmental cues drug addiction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Outline stimulus substitution vs opponent process by Solomon and Corbin 1973

A

How CRs change overtime and bidirectional
Underlying net emotional reactions change over time from initial stimulations to prolonged.
Sum of two underling processes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Outline stimulus substitution vs opponent process by Solomon and Corbin 1973 2 underlying processes

A

Alpha = positive going reaction
Beta = negative
Beta dominant as conditioning proceeds. Net shifts.
E.g. several times holding fag not smoking. Response decrease become negative. Elicit cravings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Outline compensatory conditioned responses with Diabetes

A

Compensatory CRs result aversive withdrawal reaction counterbalancing action overshoots
Blood sugar repeatedly increased glucose injection. Placebo decrease blood sugar
Blood sugar repeatedly decreased by insulin injection, placebo results increase blood sugar level
Blood sugar raises anticipation placebo bringing it down

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does compensatory conditioned responses such as that in diabetes tell us?

A

See how compensatory physiological reactions may result in tolerance
Similar physiologically react drug addictions
Drug not delivered get compensatory reaction. Build up tolerance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Outline compensatory responses of drug addiction in Siegel 1977

A

Repeated morphine injection less and less effective - tolerance
Substitute placebo injection, pain sensitivity may be even further increased conditioned withdrawal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did Siegel 1977 propose mechanism relapse drug taking

A

Conditioned withdrawal mechanisms relapse drug taking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Discuss compensatory conditioned responses

A

Adrenaline. UCS heart rate increases. CNS controls. UCR reaction lowering heart rate through compensatory mechanism
Conditioned cue injection decrease heart rate
UCS peripheral effect stimulate NS to compensate
Corrections occur anticipation/before drug present and in presence cues
Using different methods absorption affect tolerance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Outline Agonistic responses of drug addiction by Stewart et al 1984

A

Little what you want makes you want it more

Conditioned incentive effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What effect is associated with Agonistic responses of drug addiction by Stewart et al 1984

A

Hebb effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Outline evaluation of Agonistic responses of drug addiction by Stewart et al 1984

A

Incentive effects only work when drugs actually available
Ask people how feel in presence cue their drug do not report any negativity
As if receiving dopamine surge (reward)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Who researched reaction and counter reaction to shock

A

Church et al 1966

17
Q

Define Church 1966 reaction and counter reaction to shock

A

Opponency fact life of unconditional relations

Time dependent

18
Q

Outline activity after morphine or saline injections

A

After morphine activity first decreased then increased above normal
Reaction then counter-reaction
Inhibiting one but not both components of response
Morphine associated unique box or environment box elicited increase activity as if it were additive (compensatory! Aspect reaction morphine

19
Q

Outline the implications and risk of overdose by Siegel and Kim 2000

A

Overdose patient switched oral morphine to skin patch substitute. Changing cue/environment risk overdose

20
Q

Outline the implications and risk of overdose by Zador 1999

A

Ingesting heroin in unusual setting not currently publicised as a risk

21
Q

Implications by exposure of treatments

A
Latency relapse 
Extent relapse 
Cue reactivity 
Self reports drug use and urges 
Withdrawal symptoms
22
Q

Outline applying animal learning in CBT by Siegel and Ramos 2002 Spontaneous Recovery

A

Spontaneous recovery: thought extinguished reappear. Best use widely spaced extinction trials minimise.

23
Q

Outline applying animal learning in CBT by Siegel and Ramos 2002 Context Effects

A

Extinction as CS-no-US associations
Context specific
Therapy room vs Normal setting

24
Q

Outline applying animal learning in CBT by Siegel and Ramos 2002 Occasion Setting Role of Context

A

Occasion settees don’t extinguish when presented on their own
Do not occur without other cues
Don’t extinguish same way
Ineffective exposure therapy maybe working with wrong cue

25
Q

Reasons for mixed results in exposure treatments

A

Exposure occasion setters
Cues from act of self administration
Interoceptive drug associates cues early direct effects or drug onset cues
Potential for overshadowing, drug onset cues likely highly salient
Cue exposure treatment procedures for problem drinking include promising doses alcohol

26
Q

Outline why this is an overly reductionist approach

A

Psychological dependency - imaging drug cues elicits craving. Emotions elicit withdrawal distress and craving psychological dependency

27
Q

Outline conclusions

A

Drug addiction bio-associative model
Novel implications, both practical and theoretical
Compare associative processes in other disorders

28
Q

How can drugs of abuse result in over conditioning

A

Amphetamine increases conditioning to weak cues in LI procedures example