Lecture 10 Flashcards
Power
The capacity that A has to influence the behaviour of B so that B acts in accordance with A’s wishes
Exists as a potential or fully actualized influence over a dependent relationship
Formal power
Established by an individual’s position in an organization
-Coercive power
A power base dependent on fear of negative results
-Reward power
Compliance achieved based on the ability to distribute rewards that others view as valuable
-Legitimate power
The formal authority to control and use resources based on a person’s position in the formal hierachy
Personal power
Power that comes from a individual’s unique characteristics
-Expert power:
Influence based on special skills or knowledge
-Referent power
Influence based on possession by an individual of desirable resources or personal traits
Powertactics
Ways in which individual translate power bases into specific actions
Nine influence tactics
three most effective
- Legitimacy
- rational persuasion*
- inspirational appeals*
- consultation*
- exchange
- personal appeals
- ingratiation
- pressure
- coalitions
pressure least effective
* most effective
Choice and effectiveness of influence tactics are moderated by:
-Sequencing of tactics
Softer to hard tactics work best
-Political skill of the user
-The culture of the organizaton
Culture affects user’s choice of tactic
Relationship conflict
Awareness of interpersonal incompatibilities
negative
Task conflict
Awareness of differences in viewpoints and opinions about content and goals of work
negative and positive
Process conflict
Awareness of controversies about aspects of how wok gets done
Negative
When does task conflict work?
- Not accompanied by relationship conflict
- Happens in top-management teams rather than on lower organizational levels
Two approaches of Negotiation (Bargaining)
-Distributive Bargaining
Negotiation that seeks to devide up a fixed amount of resources; a win-lose situation
-Integrative Bargaining
Negotiation that seeks one or more settlements that can creat a win-win solution
Many negotiations mix of the two approaches
Dawson’s Gambits
- Always flinch at the first offer
- Give your lagerst concession first
- Deferring responsibility
- Make deliberate mistakes
Bias in negotiation: fixed-pie assumptions
- (false) assumption of incompatibility and identical priority of interest –> perceved zero-sum or win-lose situation
- Frequent and persistent
- More common in inexperience negotiators
- Promotes contentious behaviour
- Hinders development of integrative solution
Bias in negotiation: regid thinking
-Decreades dognitive flexibility
Cognitive flexibilit crucil for integrative solutions
-Perceived/actual conflict *increases arousal and induces cognitive rigidity
more competitve negotiation by reduced inclusive and creative thinking
*Less likely to detect opportunities for integrative solutions
Emotions in negotiation
intrapersonal
Intrapersonal effects:
- positive effect leads to more cooperative behaviour, better problem solving
- Angry are negotiators less accurate in judging interests of opponnents and less ableto engage in problem-solving