Language guided notes Flashcards

1
Q

What is meant by the great leap forward and how does this relate to the evolution of language?

A

great leap forward coined by Jared Diamond

all decendents from small breeding group somehwere in africa - began spreading around the world. called the great leap froward. commonly assumed that emeregence of language made it possible ot carry otu planning, interpretating and evaulation and expression of thought ect without which hard to see how acts of creative imagination couldve taken place - could have had genetic advantage to communcate through sympolic behaviour .e.g. cave paintings - homosapians first species capable of symbolic thought

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

are gestures the same as sign language

A

no.
hand gestures are non linguistic expressions whereas words in signed form are linguistic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain the two neurobiological mechanisms that have been proposed in support of gestural evolution accounts

A

1: Cerebral Laterisation (corballis)
- humans show right handed preference controlled by LH
- language typically laterised in the LH

*the correlation between hand preference and language dominance is sta

left handers can have RH representation of language.
cerebral laterisation does not provide evidence for gestual evolution of language theories

2: mirror neurons
- a class of visuomotor meurons that fire both when goal directed mouth or hand actions are both observed and executed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

describe the differences in conceptualisations of time between ENglish and Mandarin speakers - what influence do these differences have on future planning

A

English speakers tend to think HORIZONTALLY : e.g. we can look FORWARD to the good times ahead, think BACK to days past

Mandarin Speakers tend to think VERTICALLY: e.g. knowledge handed DOWN to future generations

IN english imght say i will go to the play tomorrow (strong future tense)
in mandarin it might be I go to play tomorrow - weaker future tense

speakers of languages without st4rong future tenses tend to be more responsible about planning for the future

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

explain the differences in early language development between biliguals and monolinguals

A
  • children in primary school bilingual programs with fewer hours of english outperformed comparable children in ENglish in statewide testing (2007)
  • early studies on biligualism in children reported superior performance in monolingual children (welsh english children aged 7-11 had lower intelligence scores than english monolingual children)

these studies failed to control for age, gender, socioeconomic statis. testign typically occured in one language.

in the first controlled study bilingual children outperformed monolingual children in nonverbal intelligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

early monolingual advantages vs early bilgual advantages

A

1: language and literacy development in monolingual children is better in early years : both receptive and vocabulary in ech language is worse in bilinguals

evidence for maturational delay- they catch up

2: consistent evidence for bilingual kdids to have advantages in metalinguistic awerness, theory of mind and multitasking (better at identyfing gramatically incorrect sentences and better are phoneme segmentation tasks) - they also orientant gaze faster to unfamilar langues being spoken, better at inhibtory control tasks

bi kids outperfomr monos on false beleif tasks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

brocas area

A

associated with language production

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

wernickes area

A

associated with language comphrension

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

anagular gyrus

A

associated with complex language functions i.e. reading, writting and interpretation of what is written

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

inferiour frotnal gyrus

A

key area for language prudction and comphrehnsion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

psycholinguistics

A

understanding how humans aquire, generate and receive langage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

phonology

A

is an independent generative system .e.g. non words (study of sound structure)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

allophones

A

phoentic variations - different pronunciatoins e.g. the L in love and wool are pronouncved differently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

semantics

A

the study of meanings e.g. destination and last stop technically mean the same thing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

syntax

A

the arragment of words in sentences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

aphasia

A

aphasia is a brain damaged produced deficit in the ability to produce or comphrend language

it is not an inpairment of intellectual ability, primary motor or sensory disorder

17
Q

brocas aphasia (classic model)

A

in which the person knows what they want to say but is unable to produce the words or sentence.

Difficulty forming complete sentences.
Leaving out words like “is” or “the.”
Saying something that doesn’t resemble a sentence.
Trouble understanding sentences.
Making mistakes in following directions like “left, right, under and after.”
Using a word that’s close to what you intend, but not the exact word; for example, saying “car” when you mean “truck.”

18
Q

wernickes aphasia (classic model)

A

Say many words that don’t make sense.
Use the wrong words; for instance, you might call a fork a “gleeble.”
String together a series of meaningless words that sound like a sentence but don’t make sense.

19
Q

brocas aphasia (psycholinguistic model)

A

difficulty producing the correct allophone of a phoneme
: misspronounce a phoneme and poor phonetic ability and phonem selection

difficulty with syntax production:
- few function words e.g. verbs are produced
- content words preserved
- associated with comprehension deficets

20
Q

wernickes aphasia (psycholinguistic model)

A

substiture phonemes e.g. p for b
- poor phonemic selection/discrimination but preserved phonetic ability

do not have issues with syntax

21
Q

apraxia vs dysarthia

A

these are motor speech disorders:
apraxia: inconsistent speech errors - receptive language skills may be significantly higher than expressive langiage skills

dysarthia: articulation is pmrecise, distorted, slurred, mumbled but speech is fairly consistent

in apraxia the ability is present but cannot perform functions whereas in dyspraxia the ability itself is lost.

22
Q

alexia is the

A

impairment in the ability to read

subtypes:
- surface
- phonological
- deep

23
Q

agraphais is the

A

inability to wrtie

subtypes:
- central
- peripheral

24
Q

what is dyslexia

A

reading disorder
Issues with
- phoentic awareness (knowledge of and ability to manipulate the sound structure of words)

  • Rapid automatised naming (RAN) – naming series of familiar stimuli aloud (reflects efficient visual-verbal
    connections)
  • Reading fluency – ability to read single words and connected text with the accuracy and speed required to
    support efficient comprehension

n the dyslexic brain, the connections between the occipital lobe, angular
gyrus, and Broca’s area are not engaged
• Less activation in areas of occipital lobe and angular gyrus involved with reading
• Only the inferior frontal gyrus (Broca’s area) is active, and a higher degree of
activity is found here in order to compensate

25
Q

grounded models

A

propose word meaning is represented in the same sensory or motor structures responsible for mediating perception and action

26
Q

distributed models

A

do not localise meaning representation to any particular cortical strucutre .

27
Q

distrubted plus hun

A

propse ATL plays key role in mediating amodal conceptual representation

28
Q

Hebbian assciation

A

nuerons that fire togehter, wire together

e.g. pair a tone with a puff of air and soon that tone alone with elicit a blink response