language Flashcards

1
Q

language acquisition- phonology

A
  • 3 months – eye contact with a speaking
    adult and gurgling
  • 6 months - babbling
  • 9 months- first ‘words’
  • 18 months -speak 50 words and understand
    150 words
  • 24 months – 500 words
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

dehaene-lambertz et al (2002)

A

fMRI of 3-month-old infant’s brain response to spoken words – results similar to adult
patterns of activation
activates planum temporale, superior temporal gyrus and temporal lobe
adult cortical language areas are already active in infants, before
the onset of speech production

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

phonological distinction and discrimination

A
  • newborns are sensitive to almost every phonological
    distinction yet tested
  • adults have difficulty discriminating speech sounds that are not contrastive in their native language
  • this change happens at about 12 months
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are conditioned head turn tasks?

A

used to measure infants speech perception and phonological distinction
e.g r-l sounds detected by 10-12 month old american children but not japanese

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is responsible for the change in our
ability to discriminate ‘non- native’ contrasts?

A
  1. the maintenance/loss hypothesis
  2. functional reorganisation hypothesis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is the maintenance/loss hypothesis of language?

A

role of experience is to maintain perceptual
sensitivities
lack of exposure leads to loss of perceptual ability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

predictions from the maintenance/loss hypothesis

A

adults will be unable to perceive any contrasts that they have no had sufficient exposure to
children older than 12 months can move to a new country and require native phonology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is the functional reorganisation hypothesis?

A
  • no absolute hardware changes in auditory system
  • development of a linguistic system that imports a subset
    of the contrasts from the auditory system.
  • as babies acquire a linguistic system in their first
    year, they “learn” which distinctions need to be
    represented in that system
    – enables categorisation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

evidence of functional reorganisation and categorisation

A

during production of speech, children take statistics on the language they hear
distributions grow
babies absorb stats of lnaguage and this changes their brain to become culture-bound listeners
adults dont absorb the statistics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is the mcgurk effect?

A
  • shows that visual information is integrated into our perception of
    speech automatically and unconsciously
  • the syllable that we perceive depends on the strength of the
    auditory and visual information, and whether some compromise
    can be achieved.
  • speech therefore makes use of all types of relevant information,
    regardless of the modality.
  • there is some evidence that the brain treats visual speech
    information as if it is auditory speech
    e.g ditsnguish ba and fa only by looking at way mouth moves
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is aphasia?

A

partial/complete loss of language abilities following brain damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is the wada procedure?

A

used to determine hemisphere dominant for speech
inject sodium amytal in the left internal carotid artery
in most right and left handed people most has speech representation in the left hemisphere
left handed people did have more representation in the right hemi too

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is broca’s (expressive) aphasia?

A
  • damage in motor association cortex of frontal lobe
  • speech is nonfluent and agrammatical
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

symptoms of expressive aphasia

A

– difficulty speaking but can understand heard/read language
– pauses to search for words (anomia)
– repeats “overlearned” things,
– difficulty repeating words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is wernicke’s (receptive/fluent) aphasia?

A
  • damage in posterior temporal lobe
  • fluent speech
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

symptoms of wernicke’s aphasia

A
  • speech unintelligible
  • poor comprehension
  • appear undisturbed by their own speech
17
Q

key anatomical elements of wernicke-geschwind model of language

A
  1. broca and wernicke’s aphasia
  2. acruate fasciculus
  3. angular gyrus
18
Q

issues with the wernicke-geschwind model

A

i) words read do not have to be transformed into a
pseudo-auditory response
ii) severity of aphasia greater if cortical regions beyond broca’s and wernicke’s area are damaged
- does this suggest other regions are also involved?

19
Q

what do parallel language pathways suggest?

A

language not based on a single stream of the acruate fasciculus

20
Q

what are the parallel language pathways?

A

2 dorsal and a ventral pathway

21
Q

dorsal parallel pathway 1

A

superior temporal gyrus with premotor cortex
speech production and
generating words

22
Q

dorsal parallel pathway 2

A

superior temporal gyrus with
broca’s area
processing syntax- analysis of
words arranged according to
grammar

23
Q

ventral parallel pathway

A

broca’s area to auditory cortex
– i.e. takes speech sounds and
extracts meaning

24
Q

what is conduction/associative aphasia?

A

disconnection lesion of arcuate fasciculus and parietal
cortex
in contrast to broca’s aphasia and wernicke’s aphasia: comprehension good, speech fluent

25
Q

symptoms of conduction aphasia

A

chief deficit: difficulty repeating words
- repetition substitutes/ words omission,
paraphasic errors, cannot repeat function or nonsense words, polysyllabic words

26
Q

brain stimulation and language

A

study language function in living humans with electrical brain stimulation and
PET scans
3 main effects of brain stimulation on language:
1. vocalisations
2. speech arrest
3. speech difficulties similar to aphasia

27
Q

what are the sites where stimulation affects language?

A

parietal and temporal cortex- produce vocalisations or impaire language (e.g generate aphasias)

28
Q

brain imaging and language

A

largely confirms what we already know but there is more bilateral activation than expected

29
Q

neurophysiology of language- timescales

A

language can be broken down into units at different timescales:
* short duration cues e.g. ba vs da -30-50Hz
* syllables – 4-7Hz (theta frequency)
* intonation– 1-2Hz

30
Q

how does the brain transform continuous speech into a discrete code?

A

auditory info enters layer IV in the auditory cortex
this creates spike trains of neuronal firings
signals generated then become entrained (phase resetting)
firings of neurons become synchroned at different frequencies
e.g gamma (25-30) oscillations or theta (1-8)
this is outputted from auditory cortex to language processing regions by pathways from temporally organised spike train (output layers II/III)

31
Q

intracellular speech disorders

A

speech development linked with a number of genes
1. mutation in FOXP2 (TF) - KE family (verbal impairment)
2. CNTNAP2- codes a neurexin protein and plays an important role in brain development
3. KIAA0319- neuronal migration and associated with dyslexia

32
Q

how do we categorise speech sound disorders?

A

functional (no known cause) and organic (developmental/acquired)