Land - Easements Flashcards

This flashcard deck was created using Flashcardlet's card creator

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
0
Q

Rangeley

A

Absence of DT and ST merely creates a licence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Re Ellenborough Park

A

Four requirements for an easement:

  • Must have DT and ST
  • Easement must benefit DT
  • DT must be owned/occupied by different people unless it is a lease
  • Easement must be capable of forming subject matter of grant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Harris v Fowler

A

Easement may not be extended once granted to encompass larger area

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Hill v Tupper

A

Easement must benefit DT otherwise it is merely a licence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Bailey v Stephens

A

There must be a personal nexus between benefit of the right and use of the land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Copeland v Greenhalf

A

Easement must not amount to exclusive possession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Batchelor v Marlow

A

Owner of ST must be left with reasonable use (car parking)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Moncrieff v Jameson

A

Right to park may be construed as a necessity of vehicular access

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Phipps v Pears

A

Negative easements restricting use of the ST are frowned upon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Dalton v Agnus

A

Right to light only exists if it is in relation to specific windows

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

City of London Brewery Co

A

Right to light only extends to the point required for ‘comfortable use of the premises’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Aldred’s Case

A

There is no right to a view

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Hunter v Canary Wharf

A

There is no right to TV reception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Regis Property v Redman

A

Easement must not impose a duty on ST to act positively/spend money

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Crow v Wood

A

An easement to maintain fencing is a valid positive easement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

s1(1) LPA 1925

A

Easement will only be legal if held as a fee simple or a term of years absolute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

s52(1) LPA 1925

A

Easement must be granted by deed

17
Q

ss1(2) and (3) LP(MP)A 1989

A

A deed will only be valid if:

  • identified as such
  • signed and witnessed
  • delivered
  • sealed (if executed before 31/07/1990)
18
Q

s62 LPA 1925

A
  1. Benefits of easement will pass automatically when DT is sold
  2. An easement may be created by implication into the conveyance
19
Q

Wright v MacAdam

A

For an easement to be implied into the conveyance, there must be:

  • a conveyance/grant of a lease
  • the right must be capable of being an easement and in existence prior to conveyance
  • there must be diversity of ownership/occupation
20
Q

s205 LPA 1925

A

A conveyance includes the transfer of a freehold estate or assignment/grant of a lease

21
Q

Sovmots Investments v SoS for the Environment

A

There must be diversity of ownership/occupation for an easement to be implied into the conveyance

22
Q

P&S Platt v Crouch

A

The rule in Sovmots does not necessarily apply

23
Q

London Corp v Briggs

A

An easement may be impliedly reserved for the seller where there is a necessity to retain it otherwise the DT would be unusable

24
Q

Wong v Beaumont Property

A
  1. An easement may be impliedly reserved for the seller if it would be reasonable to assume it was within the common intention of the parties at the time
  2. An easement may be impliedly granted to the buyer if there is a necessity of access
25
Q

Millman v Ellis

A

An easement may be impliedly granted to the buyer if there was mutual intent during the transaction (officious bystander test)

26
Q

Wheeldon v Burrows

A

Where there is a sale of part, an easement will be impliedly granted to the buyer if there was a quasi-easement previously in existence:

  • Use of the easement was continuous/apparent
  • The easement would be necessary for reasonable enjoyment of the land
  • it was exercised by the owner of the whole land at the time of the sale of part
27
Q

Common law test for prescription

A
  • use has been continuous since 1189
  • use is without permission and unchallenged
  • use is open
28
Q

s2 PA 1832

A

An easement will be granted by prescription if there has been 20 years’ continuous use
- UNLESS the right has been exercised with the owner’s consent, in which case the period of qualification is 40 years

29
Q

s3 PA 1832

A

An easement to light will be granted by prescription if there is 20 years’ continuous use, even with the owner’s permission

30
Q

s4 PA 1832

A

Use of the easement must continue until the court action

31
Q

Simmons v Dobson

A

An easement may be granted by prescription in accordance with e doctrine of lost modern grant if:

  • there has been 20 year’s continuous use, but not since 1189
  • the use is unchallenged, open and without permission
  • the grantor would have been capable of granting the easement
32
Q

Bakewell Management v Brandwood

A

The grantor must be capable of granting the easement

33
Q

s27 LRA 2002

A

Legal easements created by express grant/reservation are registrable dispositions

34
Q

Sch. 3 para. 3 LRA 2002

A

Legal and equitable easements created by prescription or implication are overriding interests, PROVIDED

  • buyer of ST had knowledge of them
  • they would have been obvious upon reasonable inspection
  • the person claiming the right has exercised it 1 year prior to sale/registration

OTHERWISE they are minor interests and must be protected by notice (s32 LRA 2002)

35
Q

Class D(iii)

A

Equitable easement

36
Q

s2 LCA 1972

A

An equitable easement must be registered as a Class D(iii) land charge in UL to bind a third party

37
Q

s29 LRA 2002

A

A legal easement will only be binding if it has been registered by the date of registration of the sale

38
Q

Sch. 12 para. 9 LRA 2002

A

Equitable easements created before 13/10/03 will continue to be overriding interests

39
Q

Benn v Hardinge

A

An easement may be extinguished by abandonment provided there is intention to abandon

40
Q

Regan v Paul Properties

A

Injunction to permit use of easement is the most likely remedy

41
Q

Abatement

A

Owner of DT may abate any obstruction, PROVIDED

  • no innocent party would suffer loss as a result
  • only reasonable force is used in the process