Equity & Trusts - Charitable Trusts Flashcards

This flashcard deck was created using Flashcardlet's card creator

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
0
Q

s2 PAA 2009

A

Rule against inalienability does not apply to charitable trusts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Morice v Bishop of Durham

A

Trusts need to have identifiable Bs. Charitable trusts are enforced by the A-G.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Christ’s Hospital v Grainger

A

Gift-overs from one charity to another may fall outside the PP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

s3 CA 2011(previously s2(2) CA 2006)

A

13 heads of charity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Pemsel’s Case

A

Original 4 heads of charity:

  • Poverty
  • Education
  • Religion
  • Benefit to the community
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Re Coulthurst

A

Poverty need not mean deprivation; going short will suffice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Re Hopkins

A

Education must be of benefit to researcher/wider community of knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Thornton v Howe

A

Religion does not require beliefs to be valid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Church of Scientology v Kaufmann

A

Beliefs must not amount to ‘pernicious nonsense’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

s4 CA 2011

A

Purpose must serve public benefit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

s4(1) CA 2006

A

Charities Commission must issue guidance on what constitutes public benefit:

  • Benefits must be obvious
  • benefits must be related to the aims
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Re Smith

A

Limitation to a geographic area will be of sufficient public benefit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Re Girls’ Public Day School Trust

A

Public benefit excludes any organisation making a private profit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Oppenheim v Tobacco Securities

A

Class may not be connected by a ‘personal nexus’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Re Compton

A

Trusts for named beneficiaries will probably not be of public benefit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Re Koettgen

A

Preferential treatment may be given to one class, but not at the exclusion of others (75% max)

16
Q

s11 CA 2011

A

Purpose must be exclusively charitable

17
Q

Baldry v Feintuck

A

Trusts that seek to change government policy are not exclusively charitable

18
Q

McGovern v A-G

A

Trust will succeed if political motives are only ancillary to aims

19
Q

Chichester Diocesan Fund v Simpson

A

Imprecise wording will cause charitable gift to fail ‘charitable OR benevolent’

20
Q

Guild v IRC

A

Courts may construe wording to allow purpose ‘or some similar [charitable] purpose’

21
Q

Re Coxon

A

Courts may sever charitable/non-charitable purposes to preserve validity

22
Q

Salisbury v Denton

A

Presumed equitable severance of 50:50 (equity is equality) unless trust expressly provides otherwise

23
Q

Re Gillingham Bus Disaster

A

Uncharitable purpose gives rise to RT in favour of donors

24
Q

Re West Sussex Constabulary Fund

A

Automatic RT will not apply if impractical to return gift to donor, e.g. anonymous. Instead, it passes as bona vacantia to Crown

25
Q

Re Rymer

A

Donor must show general charitable intention for cy-pres to apply

26
Q

Re Spence

A

Naming charity specifically will defeat general intention

27
Q

Re Harwood

A

Presumption of general charitable intention if donee never really existed

28
Q

Re Faraker

A

Presumption of general charitable intention if donee has merged with another to carry on it’s work

29
Q

Re Finger’s WT

A

Presumption of general charitable intention if UA no longer exists, but gift can be construed as for a purpose

30
Q

Re Abbott

A

Surplus funds will be held on RT for donor

31
Q

Re Osoba

A

Surplus funds will pass to B if it can be shown that donor intended to part with gift absolutely

32
Q

Re Wright

A

If a purpose ceases to be charitable, the gift will always be applied cy-pres. It never returns to donor’s residuary legatees

33
Q

Re Slevin

A

Gift will be applied cy-pres if UA ceases to exist before gift can be made