L25: Legal issues in Professional Practice UQ Flashcards
What are the 3 relevant legal principles and obligations that affect your practise as a health professional?
- legal “duties” — duty of care, duty of good faith and what informed consent means
- professional conduct
- codes of practice and ethical practice
- unprofessional conduct and misconduct; and
- complaints and how complaints are managed
- thoughts about writing as a professional - the legal implications for clinical notes and reports
What is the major idea of legal considerations as heath professionals?
Patient’s safety is paramount
What are the 3 main legal duties as a health professional?
Physical or mental injuries
- the duty of care (Avoidable accidents occur ( could be due to negligence))
- the duty to act in good faith
- the duty to obtain informed consent
What are 4 considerations of meeting the duty of care?
- how obvious is the thing that gives rise to the risk
- what are the potential consequences
- what can to be done to overcome the risk (Double check with someone else)
- is the person (the patient) relying on you and your knowledge and expertise to be safe from the risk ((vulnerable/position of power)
What is the duty of care (at common-law)?
to take reasonable care to practise physiotherapy in accordance with the profession’s accepted standards in order to avoid foreseeable risk of injury to patients
What are the 3 characteristics of duty of care (statutory obligation)- a person does not breach a duty to take precautions against a risk of harm unless?
Generally
A person does not breach a duty to take precautions against a risk of harm unless—
- the risk was foreseeable (that is, it is a risk of which the person knew or ought reasonably to have known); and
- the risk was not insignificant; and
- in the circumstances, a reasonable person placed in the position of the person would have taken the precautions
What are the 4 characteristics of duty of care (statutory obligation)- to decide whether a reasonable person would have taken precautions against a risk of harm, the court will consider (amongst other things)?
- the probability that the harm would occur if care were not taken;
- the likely seriousness of the harm;
- the burden of taking precautions to avoid the risk of harm; and
- the social utility of the activity that creates the risk of harm
What are the 4 characteristics of duty of care (statutory obligation)- standard of care for professionals?
- A professional does not breach a duty arising from …professional service, if …the professional acted in a way that (at the time the service was provided) was widely accepted by peer professional opinion, by a significant number of respected practitioners in the field, as competent professional practice.
- That there are differing peer professional opinions accepted by a significant number of respected practitioners does not prevent any 1 or more (or all) of the opinions being relied on for the purposes of this section
- Peer professional opinion does not have to be universally accepted to be considered “widely accepted”
- This section does not apply to liability arising in connexion with the giving of (or the failure to give) a warning, advice or other information, in relation to the risk of harm to a person, that is associated with the provision by a professional of a professional service
What are the 2 limbs of consent and informed consent?
- duty to warn a patient of a material risk
- duty to obtain consent to examine and treat
What are the 2 characteristics of “consent involves a duty to warn a patient of a material risk”?
- this element of consent is an aspect of the duty of care
- a patient cannot truly consent if they are not told of material risks
What are the 2 characteristcs as if a risk is materal for informed consent?
- a reasonable person, if warned of the risk, would have been likely to attach significance to the risk
- if the practitioner was or reasonably should have been aware that the person would be likely to attach significance to the risk
What are the 3 characteristics of consent to examine for informed consent?
- Consent to examine and treat a patient involves implied or express permission from a patient to be touched, examined or manipulated
- The more personal, private, or potentially embarrassing the touching, examining or manipulation — the greater the need to obtain express consent
- Failure to obtain permission may otherwise be a trespass, assault or unprofessional conduct
Mr Rezk examined a patient and in doing so he:
- had her lie naked on an examination table without offering any covering
- allowed a tissue to brush over the patient’s genital area
- bent her legs up (still no covering)
- ran a tissue lightly over the upper thighs and pubic area
What is the problem?
This was held to be “unprofessional conduct” (on a number of bases – but one basis was that he did not get express permission to examine and touch her in such a personal way).
What are the 4 characteristics of duty of good faith?
- a common-law duty that practitioner must act in the patient’s best interests
- in a conflict or potential conflict between the practitioner’s interests and the patient’s interests —the patient’s best interests must be preferred
- Preferring the patients best interests must be both actual and apparent
- You must act in the patient’s best interests, and you must appear to act in the patient’s best interests
Whar are 4 examples of duty of good faith?
- don’t over treat
- can affect relationships — cannot have a personal relationship
- do not involve patients in personal financial/business matters
- don’t refuse to treat because of detriment to you
What are 6 characteristics of existing legislation of professional standards?
- Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Act 2009 (Qld)
- Health Ombudsman Act 2013 (Qld)
- Privacy Act 1988 (Cwth)
- Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Qld)
- Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld) and
- Federal Human Rights Acts