L20 - Conditioned Taste Aversions Flashcards
hedonic reactions to tastes (4)
Sweet - react positively
salty - react positively when deprived
Bitter - taste alkaloids (poison) evoking disgust, can be accepted
Sour - detect presence of H+ ions in acids elicit disgust, easily learn to tolerate or even like
Garcia affect “Conditioned taste aversion”
Animals consumes attractive thing, later animal made sick (normally with some sort of drug), animal with then avoid by association to food
Bait shyness (1954)
WW2 failed attempts to poison rats, association between food and illness when consumed with poison
Radiation
Radiation induced sickness (1951)
Garcia noticed disturbed eating in rats that had been irradiated
CTA as a form of Pav conditioning (1955)
Conditioned aversion to saccharin resulting from exposure to gamma radiation - limited impact
Garcia 2 big impacts
Stimulus-specificity of radiation based learning - aversion to just the taste of something
Conditioning despite long delays
Practicality in the real world of taste aversion
The idea that taste aversion learning is specialised that serves the purpose in the real world to guide animals away from poisonous tastes
Garcia’s 6 big claims
- Stimulus selectivity: sickness associated with tastes, separately from audio
- Long delay learning: occur when sickness follow many hours after taste
- 1 trial learning
- resistance to extinction (2 bottle test)
- taste potentiation (tapping into an old memory) of odour aversion learning
- Involves different brain structures
Stimulus selectivity: Garcia and Koelling 1996: Noisy water experiment method
Rat drinks from bottle, experiences either audiovisual feedback or sweet taste, O - nausea of shock
Garcia and Koelling 1996: Noisy water experiment
results
- If the animal had flashing light followed by nausea it shows no avoidance, if shock it would
○ Can easily mate light shock association but not easy to learn to avoid taste - When animal got a sweet taste followed by nausea it avoided, followed by shock it didn’t
○ Later tests used lots of shocks under certain conditions and got some results but extremely difficult
Long delay learning: Revusky (1971)
Relative lack of interference provides basis for long delay CTA, interference form other tastes can prevent delay learning
Conditions long delay 2 conditions
- Taste has to be novel, pre-exposing stimulus leads to slower learning, very pronounced with taste aversion learning, even one day exposure, long delay learning is much more difficult to obtain
- Sickness has to be strong
Relevance of blocking timing for long delay (Kwok, Harris and Boakes)
The later the overshadowing event, the greater the impact
Time matters, closer to sickness more overshadowing
One trial learning
One-trial learning only occurs when taste is novel and strong as pre-x to taste retards later conditioning due to latent inhibition.
Resistance to extinction
- 2 bottle test: that seems to suggest resistance as they aren’t making contact as they can always drink water
- 1 bottle: Nothing irreversible about taste aversion
- Shows orderly decline when tested