Kohlberg - child as a moral philosopher Flashcards
Heinz moral dilemma
In Europe a woman was near death from cancer.
There was one drug the doctors thought might save her. A druggist in the same town had discovered it but he was charging ten times what it cost him to make. The sick woman’s husband, Heinz, went to everyone he knew to borrow money but he could only get half of what it cost.
The druggist refused to let Heinz pay later or sell it cheaper.
So, Heinz got desperate and broke into the man’s store to steal the drug for his wife.
Methodology
Kohlberg undertook various studies related to moral development, using interviews to collect qualitative data.
The study included cross-cultural comparisons and a longitudinal element.
Participants
Kohlberg and colleagues studied a group of 75 American boys from the age of 10-16 and again between 22 and 28.
He also studied people in Great Britain, Canada, Taiwan, Mexico and Turkey.
Procedure
To assess moral thinking Kohlberg created nine hypothetical moral dilemmas.
Each dilemma presented a conflict between two moral issues.
Each participant was asked to discuss three of these dilemmas, prompted by a set of ten or more open-ended questions.
The boys’ answers were analysed and common themes were identified so that the stage theory could be constructed.
Each boy was re-interviewed every three years.
The same kind of interview was used with children and adults in other countries.
Procedure - examples of open-ended questions used
Should Heinz steal the drug? Why or why not?
If the respondent favours not stealing, ask:
If Heinz doesn’t love his wife, should he steal the drug for her? Why or why not?
If the respondent favours stealing, ask:
“Does it make a difference whether or not he loves his wife? Why or why not?
The preconventional level
Children accept the rules of authority figures and judge actions by their consequences.
Actions that result in punishments are bad, those that bring rewards are good.
Stage 1 - name
The punishment and obedience orientation.
Stage 1
This style of morality ignore the intentions behind a behaviour and focuses on obeying rules that are enforced by punishment.
Stage 2 - name
The instrumental purpose orientation.
Stage 2
CHildren view actions as “right” if they satisfy their own needs.
The conventional level
Individuals continue to believe that conformity to social rules is desirable, but this is not out of self-interest.
Maintaining the current social system ensures positive human relationships and social order.
Stage 3 - name
Interpersonal cooperation
Stage 3
This is a “good boy-good girl” orientation. What is right is defined by what is expected by others.
Stage 4 - name
The social-order-maintaining orientation
Stage 4
This marks the shift from defining what is right in terms of role expectations to defining what is right in terms of norms established by the larger social system.