Experimental design Flashcards
Repeated measures
All participants are used in both / all conditions.
Repeated measures - advantages
Requires less participants.
Participants variables are controlled.
Repeated measures - disadvantages
Order of tasks may cause boredom / fatigue.
Repeating tasks may mean unintended improvement of ability.
Order may act as a confounding variable.
Demand characteristics are more likely to occur.
Counterbalancing must take place.
Independent groups design
Participants are assigned to either condition and only complete the experiment within that condition.
You need an equal number of participants in each group.
Independent groups design - advantages
There is no issue with order effects.
Participants are less likely to guess the aim of the research.
Independent groups design - disadvantages
The two groups are not the same therefore the results may be impacted by participant variables rather than the independent variable.
Requires double the number of participants - this costs more.
Matched pairs design
Participants are paired together on a variable or variables relevant to the research.
One member of each pair is assigned to condition A and the other to condition B.
Matched pairs design - advantages
Order effects and demand characteristics are less of problem.
Both groups are considered to be more evenly matched than in the independent groups design.
Matched pairs design - disadvantages
No two people are identical so similarity may only be superficial and may still affect the dependent variable.
More time consuming and expensive.
Pre - testing may be required dependent upon the variables used to match the participants.
Order effects
Issues that can arise due to the order in which participants may undertake the tasks set for them in a repeated measures design.
They may cause boredom or fatigue which may cause a deterioration of performance on the second task.
They may also use the first task has a practise - particularly for a skills based task.
Counterbalancing
An attempt to control the order effects in a repeated measures design.
To counteract this one half of the group will experience the conditions in one order, the other half in the opposite order.
Counterbalancing - AB or BA
Divide participants into two groups:
Group 1 - each participant does A then B.
Group 2 - each participant does B then A.
This is still a repeated measures design even though there are two groups of participants.
Comparison will be made for each participant on their performance on the two conditions.
Counterbalancing - ABBA
All participants take part in each condition twice.
Trial 1 - condition A.
(Morning)
Trial 2 - condition B.
(Afternoon)
Trial 3 - condition B.
(Afternoon)
Trial 4 - condition A.
(Morning)
We then compare scores on trials 1 and 4 with trials 2 and 3.
This is still a repeated measures design.
We’re comparing the scores of the same person.
Random allocation
An attempt to control participant variables in an independent groups design.
It ensures that the participants have the same chance of being in one condition as they do the other.
Randomisation
Adopting a strategy for randomly determining the order of presentation of experimental conditions.
Can be used to decide the order of presentation of individual stimuli within a condition.
It’s also possible to combine an independent groups design with the matched pairs design.