Kognitionspsykologi Flashcards
Autobiographical memories
A combination of episodic and semantic memories. Needs visualization to work, brain scans showed that the visual cortex is active during retrieval of autobiographical memories.
Brain regions autobiographical memories
Medial temporallobe MTL, episodic memory.
Parietal cortex - Scene processing
Prefrontal cortex - memories about oneself
Reminiscence bump
Increased proportion of autobiographical memories from youth for adulthood.
Self image hypothesis(Rem. Bump)
Strong memories for period when self image is formed.
Cognitive hypothesis of reminiscence bump
Times of fast changes followed by stability reinforces memories, a lot of first-time-happenings: First child, getting married etc.
Cultural life script hypothesis (rem. bump)
Expected life events over time in one’s culture, rather than own events are more important. We remember culturally important memories easier.
Emotional memories
Emotional events are easier to remember, in greater detail. Emotions enhance memory, bigger effect over time. Improves consolidation. Amygdala is active.
We’ve seen better memory for emotional rather than neutral memories. Stress enhances this effect. But emotions can lead to worse memory - weapon focus? Emotionally negative easier to remember rather than neutral.
Selective enhancement
We are inclined to remember some things more vividly on the cost of remembering other things. We remember what is central, rather than peripheral.
Infantile amnesia
Total lack of memories from early childhood 3-5 years. Reason is thought to be development of self perception during second year of life. This gives the framework within which auto.bio memories can be organized.
Hippocampus is not fully developed, quick neurogenisis. So the memories are not stabilized.
Flashbulb memories
Memories of collective and historical memories are clear and differentiated in time. What we remember are:
Informer(the one who informed us)
Where we were when we heard about it.
What was happening when we heard about it
Own and other’s emotions
Consequences
Some reason that these memories are better encoded and deeper memories.
Narrative rehearsal hypothesis
We hear about general events so often, that’s why we remember them.
Source monitoring
Where does a memory come from?
Source monitoring error / Source misattribution- Failing to place a memory’s origin.
Reality monitoring - When we daydream we interfere with memories because fantasy leads to memory consolidation with details from fantasies.
Factors that affect memory
Experiences
Knowledge
Pragmatic conclusions: Based on knowledge through experience (Empirical)
Memories often include information implicated of what is to be remembered, TBR, even though it was never explicitly named.
The (re)constructivity of memory
Memory is constructive, we build it using many of our experiences, knowledges, perception, attitudes, etc.
It is also reconstructive, it can be affected by retrieval and therefore manipulated.
When we don’t remember something we fill it in. Quick and unconscious conclusions.
Relies on schemas and scripts.
Schema
All stored knowledge about an event or object.
Script
Knowledge related to sequence of actions. How we act in restaurants etc. How to wash our hands. How to go to work.
DRM-paradigm
Remembering a word that was never presented.
Reason for constructive memory
Storing all info is not optimal, overloading system.
Ability to draw intuitive conclusions is tied to forgetting. And reverse, remembering everything perfectly leads to lack of intuitive concluding.
Hyperthymestic syndrome(Hyperthymesia)
Remembering every detail. Lack of abstract thinking, generalizing etc.
Misleading postevent information effect on memory three hypothesis for why/how it happens
Misleading info after an event.
Memory trace replacement - MPI replaces original memory.
Retroactive interference - MPI interferes with (without eliminating) original memory.
Source monitoring error - MPI is mistakenly identified as what was originally experienced.
Trace decay
Memory decays with time. Easily comprehensible and plausible theory but without much support. Critique: With correct encoding and good cues we’re able to remember much even after a long time.
Interference
Memories mix.
Proactive interference
Old learning interferes with new learning.
Retroactive interference
New learning interferes with old learning.