Knowledge of God's Existence (2) Flashcards

1
Q

What is the Trinitarian View of God?

A

God is one but reveals himself as three persons; Father, Son and Holy Spirit
1) God as Father, prophets and writers bear witness to this revelation
2) Christ as mediator, clarity is given to Gods promises
3) Holy Spirit inspires Christians, sustains and leads them in the process of interpretation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How does Christ show the Principle of Accommodation?

A
  • Christ is the image or likeness of the invisible God so our finite minds can understand
  • Christ acts as a mirror and mediator of the divine as he accommodates himself to our material and physical state
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain Calvins notion of Christ being ‘mirror and mediator’?

A
  • Mirror: He reflects God’s qualities, e.g love, forgiveness which would have otherwise been hidden
  • Mediator: The means by which sinful humans are reconciled and brought to knowledge and love of God
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does the Catechism argue about the bible?

A

Believe that Christianity should not be reduced to the bible as it is ‘not a religion of the book’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What do Natural Theologians believe about the Bible?

A
  • That it is a source of knowledge of God
  • A diverse collection of experiences of God from the early days of Hebrew people
  • Psalms covers every kind of existential experience from knowledge of God who judges everyone to one who is a refuge and a friend
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the Natural-Revealed Theology Debate?

A
  • Calvin was ambiguous in stating whether he believed in Natural or Revealed Theology
  • God is the creator (detached from the world) but also a redeemer who is immanently involved with the world
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Brunners view?

A
  • Believes that God’s general revelation (sensus divinitatus and conscience) act a s point of contact to know God’s command and their sinful state
  • Not enough to achieve redemption, natural theology is about pointing towards evidence of Gods existence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is Imago Dei (Brunner)

A
  • The image of God in humans after the Fall is only destroyed at the material physical and emotional level
  • Formal and spiritual level of the humans image of God is uncorrupted allowing us to be addressed by God
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is General Revelation (Brunner)

A
  • God communicates through nature but due to sin humans are incapable of receiving the communication of grace
  • All we know is God exists and nature provides the point of contact
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is Conscience (Brunner)

A
  • Conscience and guilt makes us aware of Gods laws
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is True Knowledge (Brunner)

A
  • Grace and renewal of the material self, true knowledge of God is only available to those who have faith in Christ
  • Revelation of Christ ‘far surpasses’ general revelation of God in nature
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is Barths view?

A

NEIN - disagreed with Brunner
- Human Nature is completely corrupted by The Fall and no points of contact exist
- Only God can choose to reveal himself to man

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Formal Self cannot inform the material self (Barth)

A
  • The Fall blotted out the material selfs ability to know God and thus the material self cannot be informed by the formal spiritual self
  • Brunner has not accounted for the sheer corruption of the material self and its inability to be informed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

No Points of Contact (Barth)

A
  • Nature, conscience and guilt are not points of contact
  • Conscience and guilt are experienced after receiving Gods grace not before or independently
  • Brunners ‘points of contacts’ are a result of Gods grace and mercy, not a point of contact
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Order of Creation (Barth)

A
  • Order in nature is not the bassi for morality or salvation
  • Gods moral command in the bible is much different to natural law humans can perceive
  • Brunner undermines uniqueness of faith with too much emphasis on reason
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is Alvin Platingas view?

A
  • Believes the reverse, revealed theology is reasonable and are ‘warranted’ and ‘justified’
  • Natural theology however does not offer sufficient reason to believe in God and no knowledge of a God of love or grace
17
Q

What is Reformed Epistemology for Platinga?

A

Belief that knowledge of God is a properly basic belief

18
Q

What is Basic Knowledge for Platinga

A
  • The same way science has basic beliefs, for example general laws that are built upon
  • A belief that is self to be true as it makes sense of other experiences and is just so
  • Platinga argues that Christian revealed truths are basic
19
Q

What is Platingas view on the Senses Divinitatus?

A
  • Argues for a general religious sense which makes it reasonable for Christians to make religious claims
  • Rejects that this is reason (natural theology) but a god given faculty
  • Only available to a Christian as only Christ can remove sin and the Holy Spirit helps the believer respond to the defect
20
Q

What is the Atheological Objector and how does Plating reject this?

A
  • Those who reject theological claims on the grounds that they are no more than wishful thinking
  • Platina argues that an argument for the existence of God is no more rational than an argument for atheism
  • In both cases there is no incorrigible evidence for either one of the beliefs
21
Q

What are objections to Platinga?

A
  • Knowledge of God is not basic, millions of people having a sense of God could me mistaken and not happened
  • Assumes Christian beliefs are true, the faith and bible do not give enough support for incarnation and the holy spirit
  • Basic beliefs can be used to support anything the believer deems basic, tooth fairies etc
22
Q

What is Fideism?

A
  • Requirement that revelation is essential for the human mind to know anything about Gods existence/nature
  • Reformed epistemology is accused of this, ruling out reason means there’s no way to test beliefs
  • Argued that Natural Theology rational view allows it to be considered with non-Christians and all views
23
Q

If we accept Natural Theology, what are its implications for Christianity?

A

Can be argued that it does not justify Christian claims of divinity etc
- Jesus was a mere teacher and prophet
- Resurrection is a moment of hope over despair
- Heaven is just a political goal of this world transformed

24
Q

Does Natural Theology appeal to the imagination?

A
  • Argued that natural theology does not rest purely on reason to interpret religion but also on imagination
25
Q

What does Douglas Hedley say about the imagination?

A
  • Argues tha imagination is an essential part of philosophical investigation
  • Plato used stories to illustrate ideas, e.g the smile of the cave in the republic continues to raise questions
  • We use imagination like faith, consciously and intentionally to understand other peoples experiences
26
Q

What does Douglas Hedley say about the imagination?

A
  • Argues tha imagination is an essential part of philosophical investigation
  • Plato used stories to illustrate ideas, e.g the smile of the cave in the republic continues to raise questions
  • We use imagination like faith, consciously and intentionally to understand other peoples experiences