KEY NOTES CHAPTER 4: BREAST AND CHEST WALL - Breast Anatomy, Breast Reduction, Mastopexy, Augmentation. Flashcards

0
Q

What is the arterial supply to the breast?

A
  • Internal mammary artery perforators
  • Pectoral branches of thoracoacromial axis
  • Lateral thoracic artery
  • Lateral branches of 3rd-5th intercostal arteries.

(very similar to blood supply of pec major).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Tell me about the anatomy of the breast.

A

Breast base:
∘ Vertically: 2nd-6th rib.
∘ Horizontally: lateral margin of sternum to anterior axillary fold.
∘ Axillary tail of Spence extends superolaterally towards axilla.

Breast - lobes (15-20) - lobules - alveoli (10-100).

Duct system joins and opens into lactiferous ducts on the nipple.

Lobes are separated by fibrous septa from skin to pectoral fascia.
• Suspensory ligaments of Astley Cooper = upper breast.
• Septum of Würinger = thin horizontal fibrous septae from pectoral fascia along fifth rib, curves upwards into vertically oriented medial and lateral ligaments.
∘ Attaches breast to sternum and lateral edge of pectoralis minor.
∘ Carries main nerve supply to the nipple with intercostal perforators.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the nerve supply of the breast?

A
  • Anterior cutaneous branches of 2nd-6th intercostal nerves.
  • Anterior cutaneous branches of 3rd-6th lateral cutaneous nerves.
  • Supraclavicular branches of cervical plexus.
  • Main supply to nipple = branches of 4th lateral cutaneous nerve.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who described the ideal breast measurements and what are they?

A

Penn described ‘ideal’ breast measurements:
∘ Sternal notch - nipple distance = distance between nipples ~ 21cm (equilateral triangle).
∘ Nipple to IMF ~ 6.8 cm.
∘ Areolar diameter ~ 3.8 to 4.5 cm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How are bra sizes measured?

A

Band size
• Chest circumference (UK):
∘ At IMF (inches) + 4 or 5 inches (to make even number).
∘ Typically ~ 28 to 46 inches.

Cup size
• Based on difference between band size and chest circumference around most
prominent part of breasts:
∘ <1 inch difference - AA cup
∘ 1 inch difference - A cup
∘ 2 inch difference - B cup
∘ 3 inch difference - C cup
∘ 4 inch difference - D cup
∘ 5 inch difference - DD cup.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Summarise the history of breast reduction.

A

• Thorek (1920s): free nipple graft technique.
• Wise (1950s): keyhole pattern of skin incision.
• Strombeck (1960): horizontal bipedicle technique.
• Skoog (1963): modified Strombeck; superomedial pedicle technique.
• McKissock (1972): vertical bipedicle technique.
• Weiner (1973): superior pedicle technique.
• Ribeiro (1975): inferior pedicle technique.
• Lejour popularised vertical scar technique originally described by Lassus.
• Benelli (1990): round-block technique.
• Hall-Findlay (1999): modified vertical scar technique with a medial pedicle.
• Hammond (1999): short scar periareolar inferior pedicle reduction (SPAIR) technique.
• Hamdi (2005): uses septum of Würinger to maintain vascularity and sensation to
NAC.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe the breast reduction techniques.

A

Broadly classified by:
∘ Pattern of skin excision
∘ Design of NAC pedicle.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What different patterns of skin excision do you know of?

A

• Wise pattern, aka ‘keyhole’ /
‘inverted T’.
• Regnault: ‘B’-shaped skin excision.
• Lejour: popularised vertical skin excision.
• Marchac: vertical excision. with short lateral extensions.
• Benelli: periareolar.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the pedicle composed of?

A

• Blood reaches the NAC via a pedicle from the chest wall, composed of:
∘ Glandular tissue, or
∘ Glandular tissue and de-epithelialised dermis, or
∘ Horizontal septum of Würinger.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the free nipple graft technique?

A

• NAC is removed and replaced as a graft.
• Advantages:
∘ Avoids morbidity associated with a long pedicle.
∘ Relatively quick and easy to perform.
• Disadvantages:
∘ Poor ‘take’ of the NAC.
∘ Loss of nipple sensation and pigmentation.
• Generally reserved for older patients requiring large reductions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe the inferior pedicle technique.

A

• Advantages:
∘ Relatively simple to learn.
∘ May preserve nipple sensation via the 4th lateral cutaneous nerve.

• Key points:
1 The pedicle must remain attached to the chest wall (avoid undermining).
2 Base of the pedicle can be inclined laterally (increases chance of including a sensory branch in pedicle).
3 In firm breasts, the width of the keyhole pattern should be narrowed (otherwise undue tension may be placed on skin flaps).
4 The NAC should never be sited too high (difficult to correct). Nipples should lie just below most prominent part of breast.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe the medial (superomedial) pedicle technique.

A

• With the patient upright it looks like more of a superomedial pedicle.
• The Hall-Findlay technique combines it with vertical skin excision.
• Key technical points:
1 Create a full thickness dermoglandular pedicle down to chest wall, without exposing
pectoralis fascia.
2 Parenchymal resection predominantly inferiorly and laterally.
3 The inferior border of the pedicle becomes the medial breast pillar after the nipple is
rotated into position.
4 Pillars are sutured together to cone the breast; skin redrapes over the parenchyma.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define mastopexy. How is it classified?

A

Ptosis is corrected by elevating breast tissue and NAC by excision of breast skin without parenchymal resection.

Regnault classification:
1st degree: Nipple lies at level of IMF, above the lower contour of the gland and skin brassiere.
2nd degree: Nipple lies below IMF but above lower contour of breast.
3rd degree: Nipple lies below IMF and at lower contour of breast.
Pseudoptosis: Major portion of breast mound lies below IMF while NAC remains at level of IMF (after breast reduction).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How can breast ptosis be surgically corrected?

A

Augmentation only

Skin excision and glandular remodelling

  1. Periareolar technique
  2. Vertical scar
  3. Inverted T scar
  4. L-shaped scar
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the advantages and disadvantages of augmentation only to correct breast ptosis?

A

• Implants can increase breast volume and improve contour with minor ptosis.
• Not suitable for more severe ptosis because:
1. An excessively large implant would be required to tighten slack skin (and heavy implants accelerates recurrence of ptosis in poor quality stretched skin).
2. Ptotic skin may hang over implant creating a ‘double-bubble’ or ‘Snoopy-nose’
appearance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Elaborate on the different skin excision and glandular remodelling techniques.

A

Periareolar technique
• A concentric ring of skin/tissue is de-epithelialised around NAC.
• Breast skin is tightened by suturing outer ring to NAC.
• Benelli described ‘round-block’ technique of securing NAC after circumareolar mastopexy:
1 A purse-string (‘round-block’) reduction of outer dermal circumference with a permanent suture.
2 A ‘skin compensation suture’: horizontal bites of outer dermal circumference, but vertical bites of NAC.
• Advantages:
∘ Reduces stretching of NAC.
∘ Reduces nipple herniation through the ‘round-block’.
∘ Minimises puckering.

Vertical scar technique
• Adds a vertical or oblique limb to the periareolar skin excision:
∘ Allows more skin to be excised.
∘ Helps elevate the NAC.

Inverted T scar technique
• Wise pattern is used for severe ptosis (With inelastic skin):
∘ Removes large amounts of excess skin.
∘ Transposes NAC into its correct position.

L-shaped scar technique
• Eliminates medial and shortens lateral horizontal scar of Wise pattern.
• Best for correcting first or second degree ptosis.

16
Q

What are the complications of mastopexy and breast reduction?

A

General
• GA, DVT, PE
• Chest infection, atelectasis

Early
• Altered nipple sensation (20%)
• Haematoma (1%)
• NAC necrosis (<0.5%)
• Infection.

Intermediate
• Wound healing problems (5%)
• Seroma
• Fat necrosis.

Late
• Inability to breastfeed (up to 50%)
• Hypertrophic or keloid scarring
• Lumpiness
• Under- or over-resection
• Asymmetry
• Dog ears.
17
Q

How did breast augmentation evolve?

A
  • 1890: paraffin wax injections.
  • 1950: polyvinyl sponge implants.
  • 1960s: silicone gel prosthetic augmentation (Cronin and Gerow).

~ 3% of women in the United States have undergone breast augmentation.
• In UK, >10,000 women had cosmetic breast implants in 2011.

18
Q

How do you classify breast augmentation (implant) procedures?

A

Implant-based breast augmentation can be classified by:
∘ Composition and surface of implant shell (silicone, polyurethane, smooth, textured)
∘ Contents of implant (silicone (liquid or cohesive gel), saline, hydrogel, triglyceride = trilucent soybean oil (1995-99 now withdrawn), hyaluronic acid,
∘ Implant shape (round, anatomical)
∘ Site of incision: IMF, axillary, periareolar, umbilical, endoscopic)
∘ Site of implant placement: subglandular, subfascial, subpectoral, dual plane, submuscular, ADM.

19
Q

What are the pros and cons of round vs anatomical implants?

A

• There is controversy about whether shaped or round implants produce a better result:

• Anatomical
∘ Designed to resemble natural breast contour and may produce more natural breast shape.
∘ Less upper pole and more lower pole projection (various projections, heights and widths available).
∘ Particularly suitable for thin patients at risk of excessive upper pole fullness.
∘ may rotate within their pocket.

Round
∘ become anatomically shaped when held upright to some extent.
∘ can create an obvious step in upper pole (more synthetic look esp. subglandular - which some patients like).

20
Q

Describe the different planes of implant placement.

A

Subglandular pocket
• Deep to breast tissue but superficial to pectoralis fascia.

Subfascial pocket (Graf 1998).
• Pocket between pectoralis fascia above and pectoralis major below.
• May decrease visibility of implants and reduce risk of capsular contracture compared to subglandular placement.

Subpectoral pocket
• Deep to pectoralis major but superficial to pectoralis minor.
• Lower pole of the implant may lies inferior to edge of muscle.

Dual plane (Tebbetts)
• Subglandular dissection extends above inferior
border of pectoralis major for a variable distance towards superior border of NAC, then subpectoral pocket is created.
• Allows both implant placement and soft tissue redraping, which can avoid a double-bubble
deformity in certain patients with ptosis.

Submuscular pocket
• Most of pocket lies under pectoralis major. Laterally under serratus anterior. Inferiorly under rectus abdominis fascia.
• Initially advocated by S. Spear. who has since changed his practice with ADM,
which is used to ensure total implant coverage.

21
Q

What are the uses of ADM in breast augmentation?

A

Pocket fashioned with ADM
• Primary and secondary augmentation uses:
∘ Within pocket to bolster areas of thin tissue.
∘ To minimise visible rippling.
∘ To support lower pole of implant and maintain IMF position.
• ? reduce capsular contracture.

22
Q

What was the controversy with silicone implants?

A

• In the early 1980s, concerns arose over whether silicone implants were responsible for:
∘ Some types of autoimmune disease
∘ Increased risk of breast cancer
∘ Difficulties in screening for cancer.
∘ A class action lawsuit (200,000 women) against Dow Corning was settled in 1997 (USD 2.4bn).

  • In 1992, US FDA removed all silicone gel-filled breast implants from market.
  • Following years of investigation, FDA approved specific types of Allergan and Mentor® silicone gel-filled breast implants in 2006, on condition that each manufacturer conducts six studies to assess long-term performance and safety of their devices.
  • ‘Core’ study followed women for 10 years and assessed effectiveness of MRI in detecting implant rupture.
  • Allergan enrolled 715 women; Mentor 1008.
23
Q

What were the findings of the Independent Review Group in the UK?

A

In 1998, report concluded silicone breast implants are not associated with greater health risk compared to other surgical implants.

• No evidence of association with:
∘ abnormal immune response.
∘ typical or atypical connective tissue diseases or syndromes.
∘ Increased risk of connective tissue disease in children of implanted women.

• Silicone implants are associated some local complications:
∘ Implant rupture
∘ Capsule formation.

• Report recommended a national implant registry to record details of all women undergoing breast augmentation.

24
Q

.

A

Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Science (IMNAS) 1999:
∘ No evidence that silicone implants are responsible for any major diseases.
∘ Women are exposed to silicone constantly in their daily lives.
∘ No evidence that recurrent breast cancer is more prevalent in women with implants.
∘ Silicone breast augmentation is not a contraindication to breastfeeding (Cows’ milk and infant formulas contain higher levels of silicone than breast milk from women with silicone implants).

25
Q

Is there a link between silicone breast implants and lymphoma?

A

• In 2008, Dutch researchers studied a group of women with a rare lymphoma.
• A case-control study found women with breast implants had a higher association with a rare anaplastic large T-cell lymphoma (ALCL) subtype than those without implants.
∘ The odds ratio for ALCL associated with breast prostheses was 18.2.
• Nevertheless, only 34 cases of ALCL have been reported in women with breast implants
throughout the world.
• This is a fraction of ~10 million women who have received breast implants worldwide, making absolute risk of ALCL very low.

26
Q

What is the definition of odds ratio?!!

A

(OR) is a measure of association between an exposure and an outcome. The OR represents the odds that an outcome will occur given a particular exposure, compared to the odds of the outcome occurring in the absence of that exposure.

27
Q

What is the suggested aetiology of capsular contracture?

A

Capsule formation is normal, but contracture may cause discomfort and distortion.
Capsules may calcify.

  1. Biofilm (complex aggregation of microorganisms growing on a solid substrate) on implant shell.
    S. epidermidis found in 90% of capsular contracture, compared to 12% of capsules removed for other reasons.
    Therefore implants washed with iodine before insertion.
  2. Implant location - Submuscular associated with less contracture.
  3. Implant size - >350 cc have greater incidence of contracture.
  4. Surface covering of implant - Polyurethane foam covered implants have less reported contracture.
  5. Haematoma.
  6. Silicone gel bleed.
  7. Foreign body reaction.
  8. Genetic predisposition.
28
Q

How is capsular contracture classified?

A

Baker
∘ Grade I: augmented breast feels as soft as an unoperated one.
∘ Grade II: minimal - implant palpable, but not visible.
∘ Grade III: moderate - implant easily palpable, and it (or distortion from it) is visible.
∘ Grade IV: severe - the breast is hard, tender, painful and cold. Distortion is often marked.

29
Q

What is the incidence of capsular contracture?

A

Data from the Core studies show Baker III/IV contracture rates of:
∘ Allergan Natrelle® implants (10 years): 18.9% for primary surgery; 28.7% for revision surgery.
∘ Mentor MemoryGel® (8 years): 10.9% for primary surgery; 24.1% for revision surgery.

30
Q

.

A
1 Closed capsulotomy
2 Open capsulotomy 
3 Open capsulectomy
- if capsule is thickened or calcified, causing contour irregularity.
- if implant ruptured, esp PIP implants.
- adv: less recurrence
- disadv: decreases breast volume
• Scott Spear advocates capsulectomy, partial / total, with dual plane replacement.
31
Q

What advice should be given to patients with PIP implants?

A

• In 2009, French authorities found silicone gel in implants was industrial grade,
intended for mattresses and cushions.
• 5-year risk of implant rupture was 2-6 times higher than expected. 15-30% at 10-years.
∘ Allergan (13% at 10 years) and Mentor (14% at 8 years).
• Ruptured PIP more likely to have local tissue reaction and lymphadenopathy.
• MHRA tested and revealed no evidence of
genotoxicity or cytotoxicity.

32
Q

Based on findings, what recommendations were given by the UK Department of Health Expert Group?

A

• Providers of PIP implants should offer consultation and investigation to determine
whether implants are intact.
• if providers are unwilling they should be referred to a specialist via their GP.
• Explantation if ruptured.
• If intact, discuss:
∘ Risks of surgery for revision augmentation - greater than for primary.
∘ If implants are not removed, there is ongoing risk of rupture. Annual review is offered.

33
Q

What are the joint surgical guidelines for PIP implants?

A

5 UK surgical organisations, including BAPRAS and BAAPS.
• Surgeons should remove or exchange implants using conventional techniques, through original incision where possible.
• Biopsy and capsulectomy is recommended for extensive capsular thickening, inflammation
or contracture.
• Biopsy or capsulectomy is not required for uncomplicated, soft capsules without evidence
of silicone impregnation or local inflammation.
• When there is extreme silicone contamination, consider deferring implant replacement.
• Extensive lymphadenopathy or parenchymal lumpiness should be investigated
and discussed by a breast MDT.
∘ Patients should be informed of additional risks of any planned axillary surgery.

34
Q

What should be expected after implant surgery?

A

• Normal post-operative sequelae of surgery:
∘ Swelling, hardness, discomfort, bruising, pain, altered sensation.
∘ Usually takes months until the final result is achieved.
∘ REcovery ~2weeks.
• Implants have a finite lifespan; almost all require replacement at some point.

35
Q

What are the risks?

A
Early
• Infection, bleeding, seroma (1-3%)
∘ Deep infection often requires explantation.
• Decreased nipple sensation (15%)
∘ Hypersensitive and painful nipples

Late
• Problematic capsular contracture
• Rupture rate
- Allergan Core study: rupture rate 13%, 7.7% at 10 years (primary, revision augmentation and
reconstruction). ~35% of ruptures are asymptomatic.
- Mentor Core study: rupture rate 13.6% at 8 years (primary augmentation).
- The Danish MRI study: 15% rupture rate at 10 years.
• Problematic scarring (5%)
• Visible creasing and folding of the implant.

36
Q

What are the other techniques of breast augmentation?

A
Lipofilling
• Indications
∘ 1 cup size augmentation.
∘ Increase upper pole fullness.
∘ Following 'conservative' breast cancer surgery.

• Advantages:
∘ Relatively easy.
∘ Less scarring
• Disadvantages:
∘ Fat necrosis, oil cysts and microcalcification: on mammograms they can be differentiated from cancer by experienced radiologists.
• ADSC on breast tissue controversial: Long-term follow-up studies have not shown increased rates of local recurrence of cancer, (but small case series only).

Hyaluronic acid
• Macrolane™ = Non-animal stabilised hyaluronic acid (NASHA) can make diagnosing breast cancer more difficult, particularly mammography.
Q-Med now discontinued its product for this indication.

37
Q

What is the Brava device?

A

Brava® device, a bra-like vacuum-based external tissue expander
∘ enlarges subcutaneous and periglandular tissue matrix.
∘ ? increase vascularity of breast.
• After 4 weeks of expansion, lipofilling is done.

• Advantages
- achieves larger breast augmentation, 
- more fat graft placement, 
- higher graft survival rates.
• Disadvantages: 
- cumbersome device for 4wks 
- 10-14 needle puncture sites per breast