Judiciary A03 Flashcards
What are the 4 evaluative WDPs for the judiciary
Security of Tenure
Judicial Independence
Inadequate training
Lack of Diversity
+P1: security of tenure - the govt cannot dismiss judges
ensures judges are more inclined to act purely in the facts and evidence = increased fairness
+DP1: judges cannot be prosecuted for carrying out their judicial function or be sued for defamation
judges are free to act fairly and honestly - Sirros v Moore judge didn’t have to pay damages for an error
-WDP1: judges are harder to remove
particularly in superior courts which is problematic as if the decisions are unfair they will end all the courts below = unfair
+P2: judicial independence - judges salaries are protected
reduces corruption, judges are paid out of a consolidated fund without the need for parliaments approval = not likely to be acting to favour the govt
+DP2: impartial and separate from other branches
upholds Sop, public confidence and rule of law
-WDP2: judges not always impartial, some may be involved politically with pressure groups
Re:Pinnochet, the judge was found to have links to amnesty international
-P3: judiciary lacks diversity
all from similar privileged backgrounds = judiciary not culturally competent which means bias could influence their practice
-DP3: not representative of broader society
75% having studied at oxbridge - clear disparities with majority of the population = lack of public confidence as the judges are only from a small privileged minority
-WDP3: despite 42% of judges now being women
they still mainly sit in the inferior judge
ALSO
no longer need full rights of audience to be a judge = solicitors becoming judges - may not be as effective
-P4: Inadequate training
may lack experience = hinders the right to a fair trial
-DP4: lack experience in certain areas of law
potential misdirections which can lead to delays and appeals which are lengthy and expensive = unfair on df
-WDP4: public may lose faith In the justice system
as there is not a strong level of trust between the public and judges = problematic