Introduction to Radiographic Interpretation Flashcards
What is a Roentgen sign?
fundamental unit for assessing the accuracy of an imaging study —> visual cue that represents a pathologic change
What is radiographic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy?
SENSITIVITY = (TP/TP+FN) x 100 = predicts patients with disease
SPECIFICITY = (TN/TN+FP) x 100 = predicts patients without disease
ACCURACY = total true results divided by total true + false results = ability to truly diagnose a disease
What is the cone of certainty?
a non-specific change cannot help reach a specific diagnosis, but combining various findings can add value and narrow the scope of diagnosis
What are the 6 Roentgen signs?
- size - ratio to another structure (vertebrae) or relative to other anatomy
- shape - sharp, rounded, flattened, angular; round, oval, lobular, fusiform, pedunculated
- number - liver lobes, kidneys, lesions, organs affected
- position/location - lesion/organ, displacement
- margin/contour - irregular and ill-defined (malignant), sharp and well-defined (less concerning)
- opacity - soft tissue and fluid-filled masses cannot be differentiated, mineralization
How are these different from expected/known normal radiographic appearances? Sum of all of these signs is most important
What are the 5 fundamental radiographic opacities from radiolucent to radiopaque?
- gas
- fat
- fluid/soft tissue
- bone/mineral
- metal
How does cortical and medullary bone opacity compare?
CORTICAL = very dense, more radiopaque
MEDULLA = contains trabeculae and fat, more radiolucent
What is summation?
when objects in different planes are superimposed, the resultant opacity represents the degree of X-ray absorption by all of the superimposed objects, even though the actual density has not changed
NOT IN CONTACT WITH ONE ANOTHER
What is border effacement?
when 2 objects of the same opacity are in contact with one another, their borders cannot be distinguished
- cannot observe hepatic veins, fluid in bladder, or chambers of the heart
- (retro)peritoneal effusion, intestinal contents
In what 5 ways should radiographic data be organized?
- QUALITY CONTROL: Is the study complete? 3 views? Technique? Appropriate position? Artifacts?
- DESCRIPTION: recognize and describe radiographic abnormalities; use Roentgen signs and a paradigm
- CONCLUSION: What do the abnormalities mean? What value do we ascribe to each finding?
- DDX: What diseases may cause the pattern of abnormalities we have found? How does this relate to Hx, clinical signs, and PE findings?
- NEXT STEPS: more diagnostics, medications, biopsies, FNA, staging neoplasia, surgery
What is a framing bias?
opposing answers to the same problem depending on how the problem is posed
- distracted by one or more pieces of historical information that may erroneously implicate a system
- dog with acute vomiting and client is worried they ate something: most likely FB, but still consider pancreatitis
What is a confirmation bias?
you only see what you look for and recognize what you know
What is satisfaction of search?
decreased vigilance for abnormalities after the first one is found
- there is often more than one abnormalities that do not have to do with chief complaint, but should still be noted
What is availability bias?
judging probability of a diagnosis based on the ease with which it comes to mind
What is inattentional bias?
missing things in plain sight due to unexpected location or nature
- most common when a diagnostic paradigm isn’t followed
What is the main scheme of categorizing differential diagnoses?
Degenerative/developmental
Autoimmune/anomalous
Metabolic
Neoplasia/nutritional
Infectious/iatrogenic/inflammatory
Traumatic
Vascular