Interpretation of Pearson's r Flashcards
What are the 5 steps to NHST with Pearson’s r?
1) Create H0 and H1
- e.g. H0 = There will be no relationship between duration of illness and wellbeing score
H1 = There will be a negative correlation between the duration of illness and wellbeing score
2) Calculate Pearson’s r
- e.g. r = sample covariance / total variance
3) Obtain p-value using table
- e.g. Conditional probability of obtaining a value of r as low or lower than our value assuming the NULL is true
4) Reject or fail to reject H0
- e.g. The conditional probability of obtaining an r value as low or lower than ours assuming H0 is true is sufficiently small (p < 0.05) for us to reject the null hypothesis
5) Evaluate
- e.g. Our data suggests that there is evidence for a weak to moderate negative correlation (r = -0.358, p < 0.05) between illness duration and well-being. As illness duration increases, wellbeing decreases
Every visiting alien from Ziltiodia 10 is hosted by an earth family. There is a theory that Ziltoidian health and wellbeing depends upon being in a happy environment. To examine this theory you conduct a correlational research study, hypothesising that the ZHI (Ziltoidian Health Index - a measure of Ziltoidian health and wellbeing involving both physical and mental health measures) will correlate with average score on the well-established Household Happiness Ratings (HHR) questionnaire. You collect data from 20 Ziltoidians and their host families. The standard deviations for ZHI and HHR scores are 4.81 and 6.85 respectively. The sample covariance between ZHI and HHR scores is 23.77.
a) This is a (…….)-tailed hypothesis
b) The Pearson’s r correlation coefficient based on this data is:
c) The correct row in the table to consult is marked:
d) The p-value associated with the Pearson’s r statistic from part b) is less than:
e) Based on this data you should (reject or fail to reject) the null hypothesis
a) 2
b) 0.721
c) 20
d) 0.01
e) Reject
Every visiting alien from Ziltiodia 10 is hosted by an earth family. There is a theory that Ziltoidian health and wellbeing depends upon the average salary of the host family. To examine this theory you conduct a correlational research study, hypothesising that the ZHI (Ziltoidian Health Index - a measure of Ziltoidian health and wellbeing involving both physical and mental health measures) will correlate positively with average household earnings. You collect data from 23 Ziltoidians and their host families. The standard deviations for ZHI score and earnings are 3.52 and £10924.37 respectively. The sample covariance between ZHI score and earnings is 14503.97.
a) This is a (…….)-tailed hypothesis
b) The Pearson’s r correlation coefficient based on this data is:
c) The correct row in the table to consult is marked:
d) The p-value associated with the Pearson’s r statistic from part b) is less than:
e) Based on this data you should (reject or fail to reject) the null hypothesis
a) 1
b) 0.377
c) 23
d) 0.05
e) Reject
What does Pearson’s r tell us about the relationship between variables?
Pearson’s r tells us the strength/direction of the relationship between variables
What does the p-value tell us about the probability of Pearson’s r?
The p-value tells us the probability that this correlation coefficient could arise by chance assuming the null hypothesis is true
(i.e. when sampling from uncorrelated variables)
True or False?
The p-value tells you the strength of the correlation
False
The p-value DOES NOT tell you the strength of the correlation
True or False?
An extreme Pearson’s r tells you that there is necessarily a correlation between your variables
False
An extreme Pearson’s r DOES NOT tell you that there is necessarily a correlation between your variables
True or False?
Finding a very large Pearson’s r does not mean there is evidence for a correlation
True
You test a 2 tailed hypothesis for correlation with N = 8 & find Pearson’s r = -0.7, p > 0.05
What is the correlation suggested by r?
Is it sufficient evidence to reject the null?
The correlation suggested by r is strong
However, there is not sufficient evidence to reject the null
i.e. a value of r as extreme (or more extreme) is quite likely (p > 0.05) to have arisen by chance when sampling from 2 uncorrelated variables
You test a 2 tailed hypothesis for correlation with N = 100 and find Pearson’s r = 0.27, p <0.01
What is the correlation suggested by r?
There is strong statistical evidence for a correlation
However, the correlation is still weak
What is a weak correlation?
Even though it looks like the variables are correlated, the amount of share variance is relatively small
Even though there is some shared variance, there are potentially other variables than affect the variability of the initial variables
What is the formula for Pearson’s r?
r = shared variance / total variance
What does it mean when r=0?
No variance shared (zero correlation)
What does it mean when 0.1 < r < 0.3?
Little variance shared (weak correlation)
What does it mean when 0.4 < r < 0.6?
Some variance shared (moderate correlation)