Interpersonal Flashcards
Five approaches to conflict management
- Collaborative
- Forced resolution
- Compromise
- Accommodation
- Avoid
Conflict Resolution Approach: Collaborative
Highly Active
Win-win
Assessing the conflict from multiple viewpoints in a shared approach to solve the root cause problem(s).
Conflict Resolution Approach: Forced resolution
Active
win-lose
The authoritative party (HR or manager) forces the decision upon the team or individuals without feedback.
Conflict Resolution Approach: Compromise
Neutral
Neutral
Both sides of the conflict make concessions to a satisfactory outcome. The root cause of the conflict may not get resolved, and the situation may be win-win or lose-lose.
Conflict Resolution Approach: Accommodation
Passive
lose-win
By accommodating one party’s desires to avoid the conflict, the underlying root causes remain for a future day.
Conflict Resolution Approach: Avoid
Very passive
lose-lose
the conflict resolution is avoided and may increase in severity if ignored further.
Soft Negotiation Style
Give in quickly
Value the relationship more than reaching a mutually beneficial agreement.
Hard Negotiation Style
Want to win at all costs
Principled Negotiation Style
Seek harmony by identifying common interests to create a win-win situation.
Called interspace or integrated bargaining. Preferred negotiation style when working with unions.
Six Step Negotiating Process
- Preparation - Identify critical needs and acceptable concessions.
- Relationship building - building trust
- Information exchange (perspective taking) - each side states their case
- Persuasion - present solutions. Not trying to convince one another that their side is right. Rather find a brand new solution that meets both of their needs.
- Concessions - surrender less important demands
- Agreement - both sides accept proposal
Communication Channel: Face to Face
Pro: Immediate feedback. Best when discussing highly sensitive or complex information.
Con: Takes a lot of time, requires good listening skills
Communication Channel: Phone Call
Pro: allows for questions and feedback
Con: Lacks nonverbal communication, may lose audience attention, take a lot of time
Communication Channel: Voicemail
Pro: saves time
Con: No feedback or questions
Communication Channel: Email
Pros: saves time, allows detail, larger audience, provides documentation
Cons: Takes time to relay accurate message, can be misinterpreted, feedback is inconsistent
Communication Channel: Text message
Pros: saves time, good for relaying organization-wide messages (such as emergency alerts)
Cons: can be misinterpreted, limits length of message
Communication Channel: Social media
Pros: reaches large audience, immediate feedback
Cons: may not reach intended audience, requires care in crafting message
Communication Channel: Written report
Pros: can present comprehensive information, encourages thoughtful responses
Cons: feedback is not immediate, uses standard organizational templates
Communication Channel: verbal presentation
Pros: immediate questions and feedback, use of multimedia options (such as video, audio, and handouts)
Cons: requires practice and engaging delivery, requires time and thoughtfulness to create supporting materials
Trompenaar’s Corporate Cultures: Incubator
Flat organizational structure
Appears chaotic
Power comes from innovation