INTERNAL FACTORS for Class Differences in Achievement Flashcards
give the 6 main internal factors
labelling and self fulfilling prophecies organisation (banding,setting,streaming) marketisation and selection policies pupil subcultures pupils class identities hidden curriculum
what are the 3 theorists contributions to labelling and self fulfilling prophecies
- Becker: interviewed 60 high school teachers; ‘ideal pupil’ based on m/c values
- Rist: teachers separated pupils into ‘tigers’(m/c) ‘cardinals’ and ‘clowns’ (w/c) who were seated away from teachers and given lower level books/less opportunity
- Keddie (1971): teachers speak to low ability groups simple/basic info and top ability groups detailed info; directly impacts exams
describe Rosenthal and Jacobsons study of the self fulfilling prophecy
told school they tested pupils to see who would ‘spurt’ ahead; picked 20% at random to be spurters and a year later almost half the spurters made significant progress; teachers beliefs influenced pupils
evaluate labelling and the self fulfilling prophecies
- too deterministic for suggesting inevitability if failure due to labels eg Fullers study on black girls in school
- marxists argue wider social institutions and structures affect education more
- half of Rosenthal and Jacobson spurters didn’t spurt
describe the factor of organisation in schools
- streaming separates children into different ability groups who are taught separately
- Ball ,Hargreaves and Lacey have found m/c tend to be put in higher groups and teachers have lower expectations for w/c students eg enter then for lower examination tiers
evaluate organisation in schools
- external factors more important
- some w/c do well in lower sets
- some schools don’t have sets or streams
describe marketisation and selection policies
•allowed for more competitive schools and m/c seen as desirable bc they achieve better exam results and w/c liabilities
evaluate marketisation and selection policies
- Ball and Whitty claim league tables/funding formula reproduce class inequalities by creating inequalities between schools
- pupils now assessed by ‘Progress 8’ which compares attainment at SATS with 8GCSE scores; more inclusive
describe Lacey’s contribution to pupil subcultures
subcultures develop due to:
differentiation:teacher categorise pupils on how they perceive their ability/attitude/behaviour
polarisation: pupils respond to steaming by moving to one of two opposite extremes
•pro school = higher sets, m/c, committed
•anti school= lower sets, w/c, low delft esteem
describe David Hargreaves (1967) contribution to subcultures
found subcultures formed due to: failing 11+ exams, placed in low streams and labelled worthless louts; higher subculture status then to those who flouted school rules
evaluate subcultures contributions
- too simplistic; there is also ingratiation(teachers pet), ritualism (go through motions), retreatism (muck about) and rebellion (reject school)
- Furlong (1984) argues students react diff to diff teachers and subjects
- Ball found in schools that abolished streaming that while polarisation didn’t exist differentiation still did; labelling more important ,?
describe Archers contributions to pupils class identities
- w/c feel that to be academically successful they’d have to change how they talk and present to fit in with m/c spaces eg university and professional careers
- m/c habitus stigmatises w/c identities eg Nike identity seen by m/c and schools as tasteless
evaluate pupils class identities and schools
- lots of people wear diff brands, nike identity not solid
* many w/c still go to uni / dress differently
describe what is meant by the hidden curriculum
•school teaches norms/values to students eg being punctual and dressing smartly
who appreciates the hidden curriculum and why
functionalists believe we are socialised so we can be beneficial to society and be functioning humans; hidden curriculum allows for this by showing benefits of working hard and being punctual