Internal factors and ethnicity (pt 2) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the difference between individual and institutional racism?

A

Individual - Results from prejudiced views of individual teachers and others.

Institutional - Discrimination that is built into the way institutions such as school operate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which sociologist came up with locked in inequality?

A

Roithmayr (2003)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is locked-in inequality?

A

Historical discrimination is so large that it becomes unconscious.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How does Gillborn link locked-in inequality to education?

A

Ethnic discrimination is so locked into the education system that it is an ‘inevitable feature’ of it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Moore and Davenport’s 1990 study reveal about the link between marketisation and segregation?

A

Selection processes lead to ethnic segregation, with minority pupils failing to get into better secondary schools due to discrimination.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are two reasons why school admissions processes lead to ethnic minority children not getting into good schools?

A
  1. Reports from primary schools that stereotype minority students.
  2. Lack of information and application forms in minority languages.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does ethnocentric mean?

A

An attitude or policy that prioritises the culture of one ethnic group over another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Give two examples of how the UK school curriculum in ethnocentric

A

Languages, literature and music - Troyna and Williams - meagre provision for teaching Asian languages compared to European ones.
David (1993) - ‘specifically British’ - largely ignores non-European languages, literature and music.

  1. History - Ball (1994) - ignores ethnic diversity and promotes ‘little Englandism’ e.g. history recreating a ‘mythical age of empire and past glories’ whilst ignoring the history of black and Asian people
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does Coard (2005) say about the effect the teaching of ethnocentric history does on black pupils?

A

The portrayal of the British bringing civilisation to the primitive people they colonised undermines black children’s self-esteem - underachievement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does Gillborn (2008) argue about assessments?

A

Rigged - meant to validate the superiority of the dominant culture and they will be changed to ‘re-engineer failures’ for black pupils.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is an example of the failure of assessments?

A

e.g. the replacement of baseline assessments in primary schools when a child starts school to the foundation stage profile (2003) was problematic as black children appeared to do worse than their white counterparts overnight. Going from 20% above the average to being ranked lower than white children across all six developmental areas it measured.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the two reasons why black children underperformed in assessments?

A
  1. FSP is largely based off of teacher’s judgement whereas the baseline assessments used written tests as well
  2. A change in timing - the FSP was usually completed at the end of reception, whereas baseline assessments were taken at the beginning of the school year.

Increased the risk of teacher stereotyping affecting the results.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

State two examples of how ethnic minorities have a lack of access to opportunities

A

Gillborn (2008) - The gifted and talented programme was meant to meet the needs of more able students in inner-city schools, but white students were 2x as likely for black Caribbean students and 5x for black Africans to be labelled as talented - blocked opportunities.

  1. Exam tiers - Tikly et al (2006) in 30 schools that had the ‘Aiming High’ programme to raise black Caribbean’s achievement were likely to place black pupils in lower tier GCSE exams based on sets - can only achieve as high as a C.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is Gillborn’s idea of the New IQism?

A

Teachers and policymakers make false assumptions about the nature of pupils’ ability or potential, which they view as fixed and measured easily.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Does Gillborn believe that there is a genuine measure of potential?

A

No - tests only show what a person learnt already or what they can do now, not what they can do in the future.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Does Gillborn believe that the education system in institutionally racist?

A

Yes

15
Q

Critiques of Gillborn

A

Sewell - believes that internal factors are not powerful enough to prevent black boys from achieving, but external factors can.

The model minority stereotype - Indian and Chinese students outperforming white students.

16
Q

How does Gillborn criticise the model minority myth?

A

An ideology that functions to conceal the fact that the education system is institutionally racist

17
Q

How does the model minority hide that fact that the education system is institutionally racist?

A
  1. Makes the system appear fair and meritocratic - Asian students succeed due to their effort and taking advantage of opportunities.
  2. Justifies the failure of other minorities - e.g. black pupils who fail because they haven’t put enough effort into their work due to their lack of aspiration (cultural deprivation).
  3. Ignores the fact that model minorities face racism - Chinese students report similar levels of harassment to black students.
18
Q

What does Evans (2006) argue that we also have to look at when it comes to ethnicity and achievement?

A

Class and gender

19
Q

What did Connolly’s 1998 study of a multi-ethnic primary school reveal?

A

Pupils and teachers construct masculinity based on an individual’s ethnicity.

E.g. black boys - viewed as disruptive underachievers and punished them more - the kids responded by seeking status in non-academic ways e.g. kiss chase and football.

VS Asian boys - viewed as passive, academic conformists - when they misbehaved they were seen as immature rather than misbehaving - teachers and pupils saw them as more feminine and vulnerable - protecting from bullying.

20
Q

What is the interactions effect?

A

Connolly (2006) - class and gender interact differently with ethnicity depending on the ethnicity e.g. bigger gaps in achievements between the white w/c and white m/c over the black w/c and black m/c students.