Interference Flashcards

1
Q

Intentional Interference w/Contract elements

A

1) intentional interference
2) improper interference ( **where best arguement will be)
3) interferecence w/contract (except to marry)
4) interference by inducing or causing a 3rd party not go peform, OR by causing a pl’s performance to be more expensive or burdensome; AND
5) resulting pecuniary loss (business loss) **
CONNECTED BY PROX. CAUSE to interfering act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

DONT FORGET

A

PROX CAUSE ON EVERYTHING

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

can one interfere w/ a contract to which one is a party?

A

NO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

An at-will arrangement (not contract) will prompt what kind of interference?

A

tortious int. w/prospective economic advantage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

“inducing or causing”

interf. w/K

A

is a question of fact.
more than just knowledge of contract–req= persuasion, intimidation, incentive, moral pressure, or physical impediment or incapacitation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Intentional Interference w/Prospective Economic Advantage

A

1) intentional interference
2) improper interference
3) interference w/PROSPECTIVE contractual relationship (not marriage)
4) interference by inducing or causing a 3rd party NOT to enter into or continue a prospective K relationship w/pltf or preventing pltnf from acquiring or cont. a prospective K relat.
5) resulting pecuniary loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

not all juris recognize IIw/PEA

A

more speculative thatn IIw/Contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

a “prospective” contractual relationship requires…

A

a reasonable probability of being secured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

“improper”

A

=lack of justification

some juris put burden on def to prove his inteference wa justified rather than having pltf. prove improper

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Factors to balance impropriety: (juris vary)

A
  • nature of actor’s conduct
  • actor’s motive
  • interests to the other w/whom the actor interferes
  • interests sought to be advanced by the actor
  • social interests in protecting freedom of action of the actor & the contractual interests of the other;
  • proximity or remoteness of the actor’s conduct to the interference
  • relations between the parties.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

“improper” bleeds into culpability…

A

some req near criminal- indep tortious act or worse

  • some c/l malic
  • some states say reg/statute what is improper
    ex) consumer protection stat-only enforcable by AG
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Defenses

mostly ways of saying conduct was not improper

A

to share info w/recipient sharing common interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

For Bar…..other possibly related business torts w/tortious interference scenarios

A
  • conversion of trade secrets
  • wrongful termination
  • qui tam (MA-allowing whistleblower COA)
  • breach of fiduciary duty
  • breach of insurer’s duty of good faith or duty to defend
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly