Damages Flashcards

1
Q

When are damages awarded?

A

Generally when plt can show injury causally connected to defendant’s breach of duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

reasonable certainty

A

Plaintiff may collect for damages that the fact-finder can determine to a reasonable certainty that the plaintiff has suffered or will suffer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Burden of proof

A

Preponderance of evidence (applying both standards is nuts)
LOOKING AT AWARD BEING MADE,not elements

“It is only necessary, therefore that reas. certainty should be shown by prepon. of evidence. That is to say, there should be a prep. of evid as to such facts, which, if regarded as proved, would establish the plf’s case with that reas. certainty which the law requires.” 1901 treatise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

types of damaged

A

nominal, compensatory, actual, and punitive damages; and general and special damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

foreseeablity

A

What damages are compensable follows the general rule of foreseeability; that is to say, a defendant is liable for damages that one ordinarily would foresee resulting from the tort. Thus hitting someone yields physical injury and may yield damages consequential to the physical injury, such as lost wages. Defaming someone yields reputational injury and may yield consequential damages to the reputational injury, such as emotional distress. Notice how damages as a concept overlaps with causation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

emotional damages

A

Emotional damages usually arise only consequentially. Pain and suffering are forms of emotional damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

economic damages

A

such as loss of employment or financial support, usually are consequential.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

may economic damages vest in 3rd party

A

yes.such as loss of employment or financial support, usually are consequential.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

prerequisite to emotional & economic damages?

A

Because emotional and economic damages usually are consequential only, physical injury usually is prerequisite to their recovery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

I got an award from insurance. am i precluded from damages?

A

Damages are awarded irrespective of insurance. Thus the fact that one party received an insurance award does not preclude recovery of damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

must i reimburse my insurance company if i am awarded damages?

A

Whether the insured must then reimburse the insurance company is a matter of contract between insured and insurer. Usually the insured does not have to turn recovery over to the insurance company if the insured pursued the litigation. Cases of subrogation may be different.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

subrogation

A

where the insurer stands in the shoes of and litigates on behalf of the insured.
-then the insurer deducts its payments and expenses before turning over any excess to the insured. This insurance arrangement works on both the plaintiff and defense sides. Subrogation may occur in defense of a claim, and awards are made irrespective of whether the defendant is insured.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

duty to mitigate damages

A

Owed by plntf.
for example, a plaintiff suffering a wound may not refrain from going to the hospital in the expectation that an infection will set in and thereby increase the ultimate damages award for pain and suffering. The defendant may raise plaintiff’s failure to mitigate as a partial affirmative defense as to damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

diffuculty in valuation.

A

an inescapable problem.
Damages valuation is inherently flawed for many reasons, including the subjectivity of pain and the uncertainty of predicting a person’s future earnings.
courts disfavor per diem & Golden rule.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

per diem methodology

A

multipliers are used to derive damages figures from precedents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Golden rule arguments

A

for example, a plaintiff’s attorney prompts jurors to consider what they would pay not to suffer as the plaintiff di

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Why do damage valuations in US tort system perpetuate social inequalities?

A

prejudices of race, gender, and socioeconomic status, because valuations tend to favor plaintiffs of greater wealth and income
bias problem- not same human life, each is diff.
can depend on jury pool-race bias-damage calcs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

who determines damage amount?

A

fact finder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

excessive awards?

A

subject to remittitur by the court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

majority (and federal) standard for remittitur

A

that the award shocks the judicial conscience. In practice, courts tend to compare the award to others in similar cases and may use statistical methodology to identify a normative group and determine whether the instant award materially deviates from that group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Statistical rule to regard award

A

that ninety-five percent of sufficiently populated, normally distributed data points will fall within two standard deviations of the median may be employed to regard awards outside two standard deviations as highly suspect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

non pecuniary loss

A

General damages for which there is no formal monetary scale of award such as pain and suffering, social isolation et

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

acute pain

A

severe & sudden onset (ex, heartattack)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

chronic pain

A

long developing, pain suffered for life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

somatogenic pain

A

physical-pain generated by tissue damage, prompted by injury or disease.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

iatrogenic pain

A

comes from treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Why does Chonic pain syndrome exempligy difficulty in a damages valuation?

A
  • pathologies we dont understand
  • cant trace cause. (psycho or soma)
  • can problem w/proof
28
Q

Judge Weinstein’s methodology for for reviewing damage award upon party’s application for remittitur.

A

1) identify normative group- what kinds cases are similar to serve as a group to refer to as reasonable.
2) Id outliers-determine what constitutes a deviation from that group
3) define statistically & intuitively how far a verdict can deviate before deviation becomes material. (if inside scale get award, outside, no)

29
Q

How do facts such as Haley v. Pan Am challenge damages valuation.

A

looking for evidence that pre-impact fear was present. how to prove pre-death pain & suffering? no evidence or eye witness to testify, only evid was a simulation video, planes aircraft did strike tree on way. Psychiatrist testify of panic & stress.
-ct=dont need to KNOW conscious pain & suffering. inference can be reasonable

30
Q

Limb lost because of co-worker negligence. US “fair & reasonable compensation” through regulatory regimes (workr comp & occup safety & health) vs. accident compensation system New Zealand’s, pragmatic approach.

A

nz:good for predictability, good payout. bad-not a full award, not 100% plt loss (make whole?)

US: precision but @ a cost: plt cant afford it, ins.models become unviable, punish def. into bankruptcy

31
Q

Loss of enjoyment of life (w/a lifelong disability)

A

“degree of permanent injury is measured by ascertaining how the injury has deprived the plt. of his customary activities as a whole person. the loss of cust. act=loss of enjoyment of life.” pg 417 (flannery)

32
Q

pain & suffering (lifelong disability)

A

can be prospective… (add more) does not mean just phys. can be “unhappiness caused by disfiguring & crippling injuries”(-posner in Depass)

33
Q

Restoration (McLachlin)

A

put injured in same position would have been before sustained wrong

34
Q

constiture “full compensation” (McLachlin)

A

full compensation for restoration of pecuniary loss, past & future. (maybe zero cuz is NO restoration; only workable)

35
Q

constitute “ functional compensation” (McLachlin)

A

“the use to which the money can be put’ where $ going to go & used for. ex)flannery-partial restoration but IS fully functional=make sure family not put out for rest of life. (overlap-juries pt to diff conclusions on what should measure)

36
Q

[mclachlin’s 3 theories for assessing damages
(measure?-seriousness of injury or seriousness of loss incurred)] How readily US tort system use McLachlin 3 theories. Most readily to least?

A

?functional, full compensation, restoration? (no idea)

37
Q

False assumptions that might underlie damage calc. (Michael Veron)

A

For example, if a worker on an oil platform were injured so that he or she could no longer work, a court might multiply the worker’s annual salary by retirement age less the worker’s age

  • -Pltf EARNING CAPACITY:would person have worked whole life @same occupation?-occupations can be demanding,people quit& switch
  • EDUCATION&WORK EXPcompensate4 avg amt time avg person lasts@job?
  • NATIVE ABILITY-if switch to mainline work, less skills?
  • How address kids? MARITAL STATUS?
  • societal aggregate of how much people make in america?
  • our litigation model not great at this (mayb a meas. of how good your attorney is
  • Work for YOUNG vs. OLD-ex) oilwork only for so long then mainline, so cant use avg americ wage earner.
  • CONTINUED EMPLOYMENT
38
Q

Hand analysis which is better at effectuating compensation or deterrence?

A

comp?

39
Q

Damage evidence which goal usually effectuating. compensation or deterrence?

A

deterrence

40
Q

DePass concluded that loss-of-life-expectancy damages could not be proved to the requisite reasonable certainty standard. Explain why Judge Posner disagreed?

A

pltf. is only asking what tort system always req.
most knowledge, and ALL legal damages are probablistic (more likely than not-preponderance of evid)
cant disregard an entire class of evid cuz never established this indiv plntf will suffer. can be based on weighing evid. probablities are derived from statistical studies. what is diff btwn how long a perm injured person will req med attent or how soon a delayed consequence of the accident will occur. use the same objective calculations.

41
Q

general damages

A

esoteric, less anchored (pain & suffering)

42
Q

special damages

A

invoicable, have receipt for

43
Q

nominal

A

can be tangible & intangible. ex) $1 award in a civil rights case

44
Q

punative

A

punish/hurt def.
can depend on how much money a def. has
(what does it take to punish fed govnt>-flannery. tax payers pay the increase)

45
Q

damages are either?

A

compensatory or punitive

46
Q

compensatory

A

make plt. whole

can punish and also serve as a detterrent.

47
Q

deterrence

A

what we want to achieve in tort system

48
Q

consequential damages

A

Emotional & economic damages
(matte of perspective/not precise)
injuries that occurred along causal chain from breech to causation. injur ->hospital ->infection@hospital ->loss work

49
Q

parasitice losses

A

injury/loss suffered by someone not the pltf. (ex, loss of consortium) plt. is not injured party
few allowed accrd to comm. law rules

50
Q

Depass v. US

A

federal driver hit someone. traumatic limb amputation. Plt want be compensated for risk of decreased life expentency. brought med/study expert testimony-limb loss leads to cardiovas. probs.
-judge flaum-to speculative/thin to evaluate things in future

51
Q

rule(s) of damages

A

is a question of law; WHAT we will ask jury to compensate

precedence (comm law)

52
Q

fact of damages

A

for jury/factfinder–quantum/qualitative

but can bring back & say jury got it wrong, jury lacked what it needed to find=remittiter-take away from jury

53
Q

how to analyze damages if u want make whole

A

focus on law

54
Q

how to analyze damages if want deterrence

A

shape the arguement for jury-> form of proof, loss suffered

55
Q

capital basis

A

lump sum
-reduce to present day value & give lump sum award
-gets inflation wrongs out of way if project wrong
(ecomomists testify)

56
Q

rent basis

A

long term payout over time

57
Q

policy arguement

A

dont want to bankrupt def. through capial approach

58
Q

Flannery v. US

west virginia

A

22 yr old in coma for life. Loss of ability to enjoy life award by lower ct=1,300,000.is it a loss if not conscious of it? WV-says pain & suff not = as loss of life enjoyed.
Ct.says plf.subj. knowledge should not be controlling.
jury-loss enjymnt,yes; pain & suff <-no
Fed ct says punitive in nature:
pain & suff award would seem punitive-no point if pltf not aware,doesnt accomplish anything w/wealth transfer other than punish def.
-def is US govn-soveriegn immun, only pay as much congress says can & FTCA limit liability=NO PUNITIVE allowed.

59
Q

socioeconomic disparity

A

rich people have more to loose?

a def. would rather hit a poor person to “make pltf. whole”

60
Q

motion for bifurcation

A

splits, usu. same jury
when testimony may damage fact finder (sad horrible story-jury leans on instead of if pltf really liable)
-jury will know injury occur but not quantum of injury yet
ex)apple v. samsung-retrial for damages only

61
Q

Unfairness in compensation-Evaluation of pain

A

helps: -how much lawyer knows about medicine vs. how much def. will spend on experts.

62
Q

psychogenic pain

A

no common def -defined as entry in pSychiatric diagnostic and Stats manueal III (psych)

63
Q

remittiter

A

asking ct to reduce quantum of damages (jury has already decided) (jury got it wrong)
-use of multiplier is inherently unreliable-will invite remittiter.

64
Q

golden rule

A

Dont ask jury to put themselves in the plaintiffs shoes.
cts hostile to this. (bad to have jury consider notion trade his pain for money) (jury will probably do it anyway when go back in room)

65
Q

Pecuniary

A

Compensatory losses

66
Q

Exemplary damages

A

Also referred to as punitive damages, awarded, in addition to compensatory damages, to a plaintiff for the willful or grossly reckless acts of a defendant.

67
Q

Possible Defenses bring up w/damages.

A

” Pltf failed to mitigate damages” (she didn’t go to hospital but sat there so cut could get infected & sue more $)
Or
Can’t double recover, if damages are duplicative