DEFAMATION Flashcards

1
Q

Elements

A

1) publication w/fault
2) “of and concerning plntf” identification w/fault
3) expression CDM
4) fault as to falsity AND
5) Harm
most juris:
6) falsity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Publication

A

a term of art describing
transmission of expression (a communication)
requires at least negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Identification

A

“of and concerning plaintiff”
reference by name OR by facts reasonably id/infer plaintiff
negligence at least

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Can the reasonably identified party be a small group?

A

YES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

CDM

A

capable of defamatory meaning if it hold plaintiff to public opprobrium. public scorn, ridicule, diminished community respect, etc or deters others from doing business w/plaintiff.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

does the public or community for CDM have to be the general public?

A

NO, may be “any considerable and respectable segment of the community”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Fault as to Falsity

A

requires at least negligence.

if 1st amendment than “actual malice” required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

will failure to fact check suffice for fault to falsity/actual malice?

A

NO, not w/out something more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Will ill will suffice as to fault?

A

NO (need more)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

actual malice

A

When 1st amend/public figure:
intent, knowledge that was false, Reckless Disregard as to the truth or falsity of the statement. (a higher form of recklessness)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Harm

A
must be:
physical (rare) or
economic ( limited in negl by economic loss rule)
OR 
reputational (dignity)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what about damages in defamation per se?

A

“Reputational “damages are presumed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When are emotional distress damages available?

A

only as consequential damages to presumed or actual damages

can still get to consequential if waived predicate actual damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When can plntf get presumed damages in 1st amendment issue cases?

A

ONLY when actual malice AS TO FALSITY is proven

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what did pltf have to prove at historic c/l to get punitive damages?

A

common law malic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is/was common law malice?

A

ill will or malevolent intent

17
Q

Modern c/l, when can get punitive damages?

A

by common law malice (some state law) or upon actual malice as to falsity
if 1st amendment……p/d only if actual malice as to falsity

18
Q

Falsity

A

statement implies a factual basis. (a statement of opinion is not actionable)

19
Q

fair comment privilege

A

an opinion is non-actionable

required in 1st amendment cases

20
Q

Fact-Opinion Dichotomy Four Factors

A

1) specific LANGUAGE used
2) whether statement is VERIFIABLE
3) general CONTEXT of statement
4) BROADER context of statment

21
Q

written?

A

Libel

22
Q

spoken?

A

slander

23
Q

Broadcast tv is usually ____?

A

libel, regardless if written or spoken. (expression in a fixed medium is more enduring, so more damaging and also more susceptible of proof)

24
Q

At historic c/l all libel was _____?

A

per se (defamatory on its face, w/out need of extrinsic evidence)

25
Q

If not libel per se than is libel __ ____?

A

per quod

26
Q

per quod

A

statements required extrinsic facts to show meaning

27
Q

expressions that assert per se……….?

A

(from Muzikowski v. Paramount Pictures Corp.):
Defamation per se exists when a statement is so harmful to a person’s reputation that damages are presumed, and typically exists only when the statement is made about commission of a
-criminal offense;
-infection with a venereal disease;
-inability to perform or want of integrity in the discharge of duties of public office;
-fornication or adultery; or
- words that prejudice a party in her trade, profession, or business.

28
Q

why diff btwn per se & per quod important?

A

CUZ per se get presumed damages for reputational injury EVEN W/out proof of actual damages (of any kind)

29
Q

Big game winner/def.

A

Failure of CAUSATION`

30
Q

1st amendment

A

defamation vs. FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION

31
Q

prove actual malice then…..

A

First amendment hurdles fall away

32
Q

Don’t do bad true things

A

cuz in most jurisdictions, if its true then wont make it (defendant has burden to prove true at c/l; but in 1st amend plaintiff must prove its false)

33
Q

can organizations be plaintiffs?

A

usually yes.

plaintiff need not be named, but must be reas. identifiable toa personor small group

34
Q

opprobrium

A

reproach, harsh criticism or censure

35
Q

1st amendment raises 2 issues

A

WHEN:
-public or private plaintiff &
-pubilc or private status of mater/concern
WHAT: the special rules are

36
Q

3 Factors guiding distinction between public & private concern: (1st amend)

A
  • CONTENT (subject matter of suit)
  • FORM (telephone conversation or newspaper story)
  • CONTEXT (overarching public controversy)
37
Q

Plaintiff PRIVATE/PUBLIC Concern (1st amend/lower tier)

A

1st amendment requires:

(i) at least negligence as to falsity for any damages
(ii) Actual Malice as to falsity for presumed damages
(iii) Actual Malice “ “ for punitive damages; and
(iv) PROOF of actual malice by CLEAR & CONVINCING EVIDENCE

38
Q

PUBLIC plaintiff (1st amend/higher tier)

A

1st amendment requires:
(i) expression “of & concerning plntf”
(ii)Actual Malice as to falsity for any damages
(iii)Actual Malice as to falisty by CLEAR &CONV. EVID.
(iv) PLAINTIFF has burden of proof as to falsity of fact
AND
(v)indpendent appellate review of factual record to ensure that actual malice as to falsity is supported by SUBSTANTIAL evidence

39
Q

First amendment rubric was extended to ____ & ____?

A
  • IIED (Hustler v.Falwell)

- False Light/Invasion of Privacy (Time v. Hill)