Inferential statistics Flashcards
whats null hypothesis
saying that resluts are due to chance
whats alternative/experimental hypothesis
saying that results are due to experimental effect, not chance.
whats the logic behind null hypothesis testing (3 steps)
- prob that HO is right (hence results are due to chance factors ie. random sampling variability) follows a normal curve.
- alpha: defines the very low probability of the HO being correct (hence results being due to exp variables)
- region of rejection/critical region: if p value of NHST falls here, we reject HO and say its statistically significant.
differentiate between one tailed and two tailed hypothesis tests
two tailed hypothesis tests are non directional - hence two tails at either end, alpha is split in two
one tailed hypothesis test is directional - hence one tail, equal to alpha
describe one sample Z test
involves calculation of standard error: σM=σ/(√n)=(population SD)/√(sample size)
Then calculating Z score: z=(M-μ)/σM
describe one sample T test
involves calcuating standard error, but with sample SD replacing mean SD
SM=S/(√n)=(sample SD)/√(sample size)
then we calculate T score: t=(M-μ)/SM
requires normal distribution and interval/ ratio data
describe independent samples T test
when theres 2 samples, and they’re both independent of each other
requires normal distributino, interval/ratio data, homogeinty of samples
describe paired samples T test
two samples but are paired in some way.
requires normal distribution and interval/ratio data
why does sample size conofund effect size
because its used in all NHST’s, which generates p value; and p value is therefore not only due to effect size but due to sample size
describe cohen’s d, and ranges of scores
Cohen’s d = |(mean distance)/SD|
>0.5 = small effect size
0.5-0.8 = medium effect size
>0.8 = large effect size
describe type one error
false positive: incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis
= alpha
describe type two error:
false negative: incorrectly accepting the nullh hypothesis
= beta
describe power
1-beta
when we correctly reject the null hypothesis
what is good power?
0.8
ways of increasing power?
increasing alpha (but this increases type I error)
increasing effect size (eg. exposure to treatment)
increasing sample size
using within participants design