Industrial Organizational Psychology Flashcards
What are the 3 branches of IO-Psych?
- Organizational
- Personnel
- Engineering
What is Personnel Psychology?
The evaluation of employee performance, personnel selection and training, career counselling
What is Job Analysis?
Determining what tasks make up a job, what skills are needed to complete it, and its importance
3 Reasons for doing a job analysis
- Making + testing recruitment instruments
- Identifying measures of job performance
- Development of training programs
4 ways of doing Job Analysis
- Interviews
- Questionnaires
- Observation
- Work diaries
Position Analysis Questionnaire: What is it an example of and what job behaviour does it measure?
- Job analysis
- 6 facets: info input, mental processes, work output, social, job context, job characteristics
2 Types of Info in Job Analysis
- Worker Oriented: knowledge, skills, personality
- Job Oriented: tasks required for job
Performance Evaluation: Why do them?
- Promotions
- Raises
- Bonuses
- Feedback
What are the 2 types of Performance Evaluation?
- Subjective: motivation, social, feedback from multiple people
- Objective: numbers, salary, absences
What are the 5 Subjective Performance Evaluations?
- Personnel comparison systems (PCS)
- Critical Incidents
- Behaviourally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS)
- Behaviour Observation Scale
- Forced Choice Checklist
Personnel Comparison Systems: 3 types
- Rank Ordered: rated on quality
- Paired Comparison: every employee compared to each other
- Forced Distribution: Percentile ranking
Critical Incidents: What are they?
- Incidents of good or bad employee behaviour
- Tallied through observation
Behaviourally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS): what is it?
- Rated on several dimensions of job performance using a Likert scale
- Pro: May improve accuracy
- Con: time consuming to make
Behaviour Observation Scale: what is it?
Rater indicates how often an employee does a CI
Forced Choice Checklist: what is it?
Statements are grouped together based on similar social desirability
3 Types of Bias in Subjective Tests
- Halo Effect: judge all based on single thing
-
Central Tendency/Leniency/Strictness:
-CT: avg ratings to everyone
-L: everyone + ratings
-S: everyone - ratings - Contrast Effect: rating based on comparison to others
What is the best way to reduce bias in subjective tests?
Train the raters
9 Selection Procedures for Personnel Selection
- Cognitive tests
- Job knowledge test
- Work samples
- Interviews
- Biographical info
- Assessment centres
- Personality tests
- Interest inventories
- Integrity tests
Personnel Selection: Cognitive Tests
- Most valid predictor of performance; this increases as job complexity increases
- 0.51-0.75
Personnel Selection: Job Knowledge Test
- Good predictor, esp. for those with previous experience
- Validity increases as job complexity increases
- 0.62
Personnel Selection: Work Samples
- Pros: less discrimination against marginalization ppl
- Help find ppl for training
- 0.33 correlation between work sample and job performance
Personnel Selection: Interviews
Moderately accurate
Most accurate are structured and situational interviews
Personnel Selection: Biographical Info
- Employee history
- As accurate as cog test
- Predicts turn-over well
- Only helpful if very specific to job
Personnel Selection: Assessment Centres
- Does selection, promotion, training
- Multiple assessments given
- In Basket Test: response to real work tasks
- Criterion Contamination: raters knowledge of someone’s performance affects how they’re viewed on the job
- High validity
Personnel Selection: Personality Tests
- Starting to become more popular
- OCEAN a common one
- Not good @ predicting task performance
Personnel Selection: Interest Inventories
- Career counselling based
- E.g.: Strong-Campbell Interest Inventory, Kuder Occupational Interest Survey
Personnel Selection: Integrity Tests
Screens for problematic behaviour
Legal Issues in Personnel Selection: Adverse Impact
- Results in one group being selected more than others
- 80% rule: when selection rate for a minority group is less than 80% of majority group
- May be allowed if certain criteria are defs required for the job (e.g. physical strength)
Causes of Adverse Impact in Personnel Selection: Differential Validity
- Validity coefficients from 2 subgroups differ greatly
- Rare, but affects both groups negatively
Causes of Adverse Impact in Personnel Selection: Unfairness
One group consistently scores lower on a test, but both perform just as well on the job
Personnel Selection: 3 types of score adjustments for Adverse Impact
- Separate cutoffs
- Within group norming: percentil ranks, standard scores
- Banding: range for scores, equate to different bands
Americans with Disabilities Act: what did it do?
- Illegal to discriminate against qualified disabled people and illegal to deny reasonable accommodations
- What are reasonable accommodations? accessible facilities, job restructuring, adjusting work schedules, modify exams, provide qualified readers/interpreters
- Exception: those using illegal drugs
Psychometric Issues in Personnel Selection: Incremental Validity
- Positive hit rate - base rate
- Taylor-Russel table for Inc. Validity gives estimate of positive hit rate
- Maximized when validity coefficient is high
- Moderate base rate is good (50%)…means that current procedures are working. Low base rate means selection is not the problem
Psychometric Issues in Personnel Selection: Utility Analysis
- Assesses the cost-effectiveness of a selection procedure
Psychometric Issues in Personnel Selection: Combining Predictors (3 ways)
- Multiple Regression: estimate score based on scores of predictors. Compensatory technique
- Multiple Cutoff: Must score above min cut off on each predictor to be hired. Non-compensatory
- Multiple Hurdle: Meet min level on multiple predictors to be selected. Administered one at a time, and must pass each one to progress
What are the 3 Steps in any Training?
- Needs analysis
- Program design
- Program evaluation
4 Types of Needs Analysis
- Organizational Analysis: will training help solve problem?
- Task Analysis: what is needed to do this well? Forms objectives that inform instructional goals
- Person Analysis: What do different groups need?
- Demographic Analysis: deficits?
What is Program Design Decided Upon?
Cost, the material covered, trainees
Program Design: On the Job Training
- Trained by another worker
- Rotating shifts in different departments
- Pros: cheap, easy
- Cons: unstructured, high risk of error, workers may not be good trainers
Program Design: Vestibule Training
- Simulated
- Pros: reduces risk w/ error, repetition and coaching
- Cons: only simulated
Program Design: Classroom Training
- Simulated work environment set up elsewhere with trainers
- Pros: personalized, errors not costly
Program Design: Programmed Instruction
Info broken into chunks
Pros:
* Good for content knowledge
Cons:
* not good for complex skills
Program Evaluation: Formative Evaluation
Purpose: ID anything that can be changed
Looks at: trainees feedback, satisfaction, did they learn?
Program Evaluation: Summative Evaluation
Purpose: assess effectiveness of program
Program Evaluation: Kirkpatrick’s Evaluation Model
Level One (Reaction Criteria):
* Participant response: did they like content? the trainer? was it helpful?
Level Two (Learning Criteria):
* Quantify the learning w/ pre/post tests
Level Three (Behaviour Criteria):
* Look at impact of intervention on performance
Level Four (Results Criteria):
* Impact of training on larger organizational goals
Level Five (Phillip’s ROI)
* ROI should be done at each level
Career Counselling: Aptitude Tests
Assesses the ‘potential for learning’
Special Aptitude Test: assesses specific ability. E.g. psychomotor (Purdue Peg Board, O’Connor Finger Dexterity, Minnesota Rate of Manipulation)
Multiple Aptitude Battery: Differential Aptitude Test (grades 8-12; job related and cognitive abilities)
Career Counselling: Achievement Tests
Purpose: measure skill and how much someone has learned
AKA ‘ability tests’ –> ability = capacity to perform task
Two Types of Theories of Career Choice
- Personality Based
- Sequence of Stages in Career Development
Career Counselling: Holland’s Personality and Environment Typology (1985)
Premise: all behaviour a result of personality and environment
1. Realistic: machinery & tools
2. Investigative: analytical, curious, methodical
3. Artistic: expressive, introspective, non-conforming
4. Social: avoids systematic activities
5. Enterprising: manipulating others for organizational goals/gain
6. Conventional: systematic data, filing
Represented w/ hexagon-> adjacent = similar
RIASEC
Holland’s Personality and Environment Typology: Congruence
The fit between personality and occupational environment
Congruence is highest predictor of job performance
Measured By:
* Vocational Preference Inventory
* Self Directed Search
* Strong-Campbell Interest Inventory
Career Counselling: Roe’s, Field’s and Levels Theory (1956)
Premise: career choice is linked to parenting
Parenting Types:
* Over-protective
* Avoidant
* Acceptant
8 Occupational Fields: business, science, art, etc
6 Occupational Levels: managerial, skilled, unskilled
Career Counselling: Super’s Career and Life Development
Career development follows stages
1. Self Concept: abilities, interests, values, personality, physicality
2. Lifespan:
3. Career Maturity: mastered tasks related to stage
4. Life Space: social roles adopted throughout life
5. Life Career Rainbow: 9 roles throughout life
Job Satisfaction: can express self and develop self-concept through work roles
5 Developmental Stages of Super’s Career Development
-
Growth (birth-15yo)
* develop interests, attitudes, think about vocational self-concept through play -
Exploration (15-24yo)
* choices narrowed through school, work, leisure -
Establishment (25-44yo)
* make place for self
* change may occur in job position, but not career -
Maintenance (45-64yo)
* cont’d pattern, maintain status -
Decline (65+)
* Lower work output
* Must find other sources of satisfaction
9 Roles of Super’s Life-Career Rainbow
- Child
- Student
- Worker
- Partner
- Parent
- Citizen
- Homemaker
- Leisurite
- Pensioner
Super’s Career Development: The Archway of Career Determinants
Personal and environmental factors that determine a persons career path
Career Counselling: Tiedman & O’Hares Decision Making Model
- Hated Super as well
- Should consider making a LIFE not just a LIVING
- Based on Erikson’s ego identity theory
- Differentiation: job not fitting, so make change
- Implementation: doing the change
Career Counselling: Miller-Tiedeman & Tiedman’s Decision Making
2 Kinds of Reality:
* Personal: what you sense is right for you
* Common: what society says you should do
Must be aware of both to thrive