Industrial Organizational Psychology Flashcards
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
original Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Act
Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection
created in 1978; use of any test that adversely affects hiring, promotion, or other selection procedures constitutes discrimination; use of test acceptable if test is validated, has utility, and no alternatives are available
Americans with Disabilities Act
1990; bans discrimination in employment, transportation, access to buildings, and discrimination in other settings; requires companies make reasonable accommodations
ADA discrimination
using standards, employment tests or other selection criteria that screen out an individual with a disability or class of individuals with disabilities, unless the test or criteria is shown to be job-related and consistent with business necessity
ADA on substance abuse
prohibits discrimination against someone who has successfully completed or is currently participating in a drug rehabilitation program and is no longer using drugs
GRIGGS VERSUS DUKE POWER COMPANY (1971)
tests that measured broad abilities, in which minority group members passed at much lower rates than Whites, were unfair to use to make decisions of hiring and promotion; requirement was established that tests measure skills necessary for a particular job
Three major problems that result in discrimination
adverse impact, unfairness, differential validity
Adverse impact
one major problem that results in discrimination; based on the 80% or 4/5ths rule, which basically states that the percentage of minorities selected must be at least 4/5ths of the percentage of non-minorities selected
Unfairness
one major problem that results in discrimination; occurs when minorities and non-minorities score differently on the predictor test yet perform similarly on the criterion
Differential validity
one major problem that results in discrimination; occurs when there are significantly different criterion-related validity coefficients for different groups on the same test; test is more valid for predicting performance of one group than for predicting performance of another
Development of human resources
techniques for employee selection, use of psychological tests, performance appraisals, training and development, and career development theories
Job analysis
describes in specific terms the nature of the component tasks performed by workers on a particular job; information about the tools or equipment used, the operations performed, education and training required, wages paid, and any unique aspect of the job such as safety hazards; important for complying with EEO guidelines regarding fair employment
Job description
job tasks
Job specifications
job requirements
Job evaluation
a formal process that determines the financial worth of a specific job to an organization
How data for job analysis is obtained
open-ended or structured interviews; critical incident technique
Critical incident technique
ascertaining the specific actions that lead to desirable (successful) or undesirable (unsuccessful) consequences on the job
Employee selection and screening options
biodata, interviews, tests, assessment centers, and references and letters of recommendation
Biodata
biographical information
Biographical information techniques
standard application blank, the weighted application blank and the biographical inventory
Standard application blank
technique for collecting biographical information; asks for personal data, including education, employment history, etc.
Weighted application blank
technique for collecting biographical information; similar to the standard application in form and content however it assigns weights to certain variables (e.g. college versus non college graduates) that then affect the hiring process)
Biographical inventory blank
technique for collecting biographical information; covers the applicants life in greater detail; questions correlated with desirable and undesirable work behaviors, validated against specific criterion; very good predictors of job performance; not often used because development can be time consuming and costly
Interviews
have worst criterion-related validity of employee screening and selection options; better if structured, multiple interviewers, interviewers trained
Interviewer biases
first impression, negative information, the contrast effect, interviewer prejudices, halo effect
Halo effect
generalizing from one characteristic to the entire candidate in either a positive or negative direction; common example is attractiveness
Cognitive ability tests
tests of cognitive ability (e.g., Wonderlic Personnel Test) and aptitude (e.g., typing test) are common and tend to be good predictors of job success; however, may result in discrimination
Personality tests
poor predictors of job performance
Interest tests
poor predictors of job success; do correlate with job satisfaction
Work sample tests
candidate demonstrates sample work behavior; high content and criterion-related validity; tend to be more valid for minorities compared to other types of tests
Test batteries
used almost exclusively in upper management; good predictors of job performance
Assessment Center
method of selection that places new job applicants and candidates for promotion in a simulated job situation so that their behaviors under stress can be observed or evaluated; situational testing; first used in German army in 1920s; good criterion-related validity; usually 6-12 candidates at a time, over several days
Major assessment center techniques
in-basket technique, leaderless group discussion
References and letters of recommendation
often misleading
Employee selection procedures
multiple regression approach; multiple cutoff; multiple hurdle
Multiple cutoff
noncompensatory approach; only applicants who meet or exceed cutoff on each predictor considered
Multiple hurdle
noncompensatory approach; predictors applied in particular order, must pass cutoff score on first predictor to continue in selection process; efficient technique
Performance is a function of
ability, motivation, opportunity
Types of performance appraisals
objective, subjective, focused on results rather than merits
Objective methods of performance evaluation
easily observable and quantifiable categories (e.g., quantity of output, number of errors, accidents, absenteeism)
Subjective methods of performance evaluations
ratings that can be comparative or individual/absolute
Straight rankings
comparative method of performance evaluation in which workers listed from best to worst
Forced distribution
comparative method of performance evaluation in which people are ranked to fit a distribution
Paired comparison
comparative method of performance evaluation in which each employee is compared to every other employee in pairs
Graphic rating scales
individual/absolute method of performance evaluation which involves ratings on several aspects of a job
BARS (behaviorally anchored rating scales)
individual/absolute method of performance evaluation in which behavioral anchors are based on critical incidents; scale development is expensive and time consuming; does not tend to measure actual day-to-day activities, rather hypothetical situations
BOS (behavioral observation scale)
individual/absolute method of performance evaluation which rates extent to which person engages in every behavior
Management by objectives
mutual agreement between employees and supervisors on goals to be achieved in given time; actively involves employees in own evaluation; two phases: goal-setting and performance review; effective in increasing motivation and productivity
Instrument errors in evaluation
deficiency errors, contamination errors
Deficiency errors
instrument error in evaluation that involves excluding important aspects of job from evaluation
Contamination errors
instrument error in evaluation that involves rating an employee on non-important aspects of job
Rater errors in evaluation
task-based rater biases and ratee-based biases
Task-based rater biases
errors that occur when rater adopts evaluative set based on task (e.g., strictness set, leniency set, tendency set)
Strictness set
task-based rater bias in evaluation; rater is overly strict and gives everyone low rating
Leniency set
task-based rater bias in evaluation; rater is overly lenient and gives everyone high ratings
Central tendency set
task-based rater bias in evaluation; rater tends to rate everyone as about average
Ratee-based biases
halo error and personal biases in evaluation
Recency biases
tendency of evaluator to be most influenced by employee’s recent behaviors
Attribution errors
tendency of supervisors to attribute poor performance to internal factors for workers they don’t like and to external factors for workers they do like
Hiring decision evaluation error
supervisors tend to rate employees higher when supervisor participated in hiring decision
Strategies to improve employee ratings
training raters with the instruments to be used, using multiple raters, having raters rate on an ongoing basis rather than once or twice a year, and basing performance on clear and specific performance standards obtained through a job analysis
Frame of reference (FOR) training
raters are provided with clear and specific criteria (i.e., references) for what constitutes the different levels of performance (e.g., outstanding, good, average, etc.); successful strategy for reducing rater error
Types of training
non-participative training, individual participative training, group participative training
Programmed instruction
individual participative training; makes use of booklets, interactive videotapes, and complex computer software; involves graduated presentation of material with feedback at each step; commonly involves self-instruction; often for training large number of trainees in short period of time
Computer assisted instruction (CAI)
individual participative training; also called computer based training; derivative of programmed instruction that is computer based
Group participative training
discussion, role-playing, business games, sensitivity training, in-basket training, and behavioral modeling
Psychological factors affecting training
individual differences, pre-training expectations; motivation; active versus passive practice; massed versus distributed (spaced) practice; whole and part learning; transfer of training; feedback; reinforcement
Individual differences in training
can be predicted through cognitive tests, biographical data, attitude measures, and work samples; training does not always equalizes differences in ability, may magnify
Pre-training expectations
individuals with low sense of self-efficacy are less receptive than those with high sense of self-efficacy
Motivation in training
can be increased by involving trainees in decisions about training program, allowing them to participate in needs assessment, giving choice of training courses; motivation affected by sense of job involvement and locus of control
Whole and part learning
slow learners may be better able to learn new material when presented in smaller units
Transfer of training
application of training material to work setting; two strategies include overlearning and identical elements
Overlearning
develop very thorough knowledge of a task; helps with transfer of training; useful for tasks infrequently performed or performed under conditions of stress
Identical elements
similarity between training situation and actual work situation; helps with transfer of training
Feedback in training
people learn best with feedback; should be offered early and often
Reinforcement in training
affects speed of learning; greater the reward, more rapidly behavior is learned; initially continuous, later thinned
Structural career development theories
focus on individual traits and occupational tasks (e.g., Holland’s theory)
Developmental career development theories
focus on development across the life span (e.g., Super’s theory)
Holland’s theory
Holland’s personality-job fit theory; individuals and job traits can be matched, close matches will correlate with job success and satisfaction; formula for successful career planning: knowing oneself and having information about world of work
Holland’s typology
personality and work environments classified into six types: realistic investigative artistic social enterprising and conventional (RIASEC); can receive up to three codes, first most dominant; can be organized in hexagon with adjacent themes most similar
Realistic (Holland’s typology)
prefer physical activities that require skill, strength, coordination
Investigative (Holland’s typology)
prefer activities that involve thinking, organizing, and understanding
Artistic (Holland’s typology)
prefer ambiguous and unsystematic activities that allow creative expression
Social (Holland’s typology)
prefer activities that involve helping and developing others
Enterprising (Holland’s typology)
prefer activities with opportunity to influence others and obtain power
Conventional (Holland’s typology)
prefers rule-regulated, orderly, and unambiguous activities
Congruence (Holland’s theory)
degree of match between personality type and work environment; correlates with longevity at job