Industrial/ Organizational Psych Flashcards
Job analysis
Describes job requirement
Job specific - PAO - position analysis questionnaire
Worker specific - KSAOs - knowledge, skills, abilities, other skills
Job evaluation
Determines job worth
Comparable with used to judge salary
Mostly uses subjective measures bc objective ones are limited in their ability to capture criterion
Self not impacted by halo effect
Supervisor most reliable
Peer- training and successful promotion
Actual v ultimate criterion and relevance
Actual - specific criterion
Ultimate - conceptual criterion
Relevance- how well the ultimate criterion captures the actual criterion (construct validity)
Criterion contamination
When an actual criterion assessed something other than the criterion
Threat to relevance
Happens with evaluator knows an employee’s predictor performance
Industrial Organizational laws
Title VII - Discrimination Law
Uniform Guidelines
Griggs vs Duke
Title VII - discrimination law
Uniform Guidelines - test that effects hiring practices in adverse way are illegal
Griggs vs Duke - tests that use general broad ability are unfair for promotion; must use tests that assess skills used in job
Adverse impact
Unfairness
Differential validity
Adverse impact - 80% rule
Unfairness - different scores on predictor but same on criterion —> can use test if change cut off score
Shown with 2 parallel regression lines
Differential validity - test valid for one group by not other - different validity coefficients
Biographical Information Blank (BIB)
Questions correlated with job success
Good predictor of how well you do on job
Interviews
Poor validity
Structure interviewed with multiple people who are trained in social and interpersonal skills
Assessment Center
Simulated experience used for upper level management that is valid but costly
Inbasket technique
Leaderless group decision
Work samples
More valid among minorities
Train ability tests - when work samples they include a structure period of Lear I hand evaluation they are called tra inability tests
Tests
Personality tests are poor predictors
Interests tests predict satisfaction but POF predictor of success
Test battery good predictor of job success
Realistic job preview
Gives people a realistic job preview with goal of reducing turnover and reduce inaccurate job expectations
Compensatory vs non compensatory tests
Multiple regression is compensatory
Multiple cut offs - must meet cut off for various components
Multiple hurdle - must pass one point at a time —> saves money bc not all predictors used
Performance = abilities, motivation, environment/ opportunity
Forced choice assessment
Helps to reduce halo bias bc the choices are all positive
Behaviorally anchored ratings (BARs)
Ranking on critical incidents related to successful performance
Problems are it’s cumbersome and people are eating you on hypothetical situations and not real life situations
Management by objectives
Employee and supervisor collaborate to develop goals
This increases employee productivity and motivation
Task based errors
Strictness Leniency Central tendency Recency bias Attribution error
Women’s ratings of women lower on male dominated fields
To improve ratings- train raters, multiple raters, multiple ratings, clear standards
Frame of Reference (FOR) trainings
Given examples of different possible likert/descriptive ratings to help people anchor the ratings